Online Now 3563

FRR: Vested Interest

Ohio State Buckeyes

It's Monday and what better way to start your week than with another riveting edition of Front Row Radio!

On today's show, we interview Ryan McGee from ESPN Magazine who wrote last week's cover story "Busted." Ohio State head coach Jim Tressel's sweatervest was depicted on the cover. We ask McGee why Tressel was targeted, what he thinks is the national perception of Tressel and OSU football, whether the troubles associated with UConn basketball are being glossed over and much more.

In our News segment, Steve Helwagen joins Dave Biddle to discuss the big weekend in recruiting. The Elite 11 quarterback camp and the Nike camp were each held at OSU over the weekend and Helwagen covered both events. What quarterbacks are on OSU's radar in the 2012 and '13 classes? What players from all other positions stood out at the Nike camp? We have that and more.

Select a format below to listen:

- Front Row Radio (.mp3)
- Front Row Radio (.wma)
- iTunes

NOTE: We have a new podcast feed. Please update your favorites and follow the iTunes link above.

Bucknuts Front Row Radio is published three times a week. Monday's show is free. To unlock access to all of our shows, take a free trial of Bucknuts now!

    • I would love for Ramzy to be the one to interview Ryan McGee...

      InTresslWeTrust

    • McGee still dodged the UCONN question. Wow, there was a picture of Calhoun. Big deal. The cover is all people see AND a majority of the article is about OSU. So annoying.

      mikeindy

    • Ryan McGee had nothing but excuses as to why they couldn't run a front cover on NC or SCAM Newton, just keep back peddaling

      THEnutbuster

    • +1000, if not more

      prtyskoolgrad

    • pretty much what I expected. More B.S. from ESPN.

      BucknutsFan465

    • BucknutsFan465 said...

      pretty much what I expected. More B.S. from ESPN.

      Yep, boycott 'em.

      Stop watching and supporting this kindergarten azz, biased reporting.

      The only thing they're gonna understand is when you hit 'em in the pocket.

      Until then, embrace the hate and give a healthy dose back to the azz holes: Pat Forde, Bino Cook and Colin Cowterd!

      Sick of these jack offs repeating the same ol' line, while ignoring the obvious in Auburn and rest of the SEC.rant

      GO BUCKS!!

      BuckNasty_MD

    • BuckNasty_MD said...

      Yep, boycott 'em.

      Stop watching and supporting this kindergarten azz, biased reporting.

      The only thing they're gonna understand is when you hit 'em in the pocket.

      Until then, embrace the hate and give a healthy dose back to the azz holes: Pat Forde, Bino Cook and Colin Cowterd!

      Sick of these jack offs repeating the same ol' line, while ignoring the obvious in Auburn and rest of the SEC.rant

      GO BUCKS!!

      Amen! If we keep listening, reading, watching, responding and reacting we are essentially giving them what they want! TURN IT OFF!

      JasonC25

    • I don 't often say this, but this kid (and sounded very young) really sucked! He could not articulate his reasoning for defnding ESpin's choice of covers or the allocations of words in the story itself. It was ALL about what would catch readers' attention, giving the time we are in. He also had no apparent depth to his knowledge of the subject matter about which he wrote, at least I could not discern it. I increasingly agree that there is little or no real professional journalism in that farse of a sports marketing company. Just seems to be what sells at any one time, baby!

      fportner

    • mikeindy said...

      McGee still dodged the UCONN question. Wow, there was a picture of Calhoun. Big deal. The cover is all people see AND a majority of the article is about OSU. So annoying.

      Absolutely!

      BIGBUCK20

    • I posted this in the house and seems relivant here as well:
      To throw Tressel under the bus for 1 instance is a sad statement for where sensationalized media is @ right now.He is entitled to a mistake here and there and one that we know of does not and should not define a liftime of good and I have no problem with his book (s) . So media please get over your miserable selves and let he who is without misgivings please cast the first stone.Thanks thats what I thought no balls or your lives are so pathetic and miserable you have to try and tear a good man down to help rationalize and justify your meager existance. Pahtetic Miserable Wretches please get lost!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      TheBuckeyenut

    • Sporting News latest issue has an article on what's wrong with college football. The two page spread title page has a huge pic of Tressel, smaller ones including Pryor and Newton, all crumbling apart.

      laservet

    • Am I missing something here ? This cover of SI does not look like a Tress sweater vest to me. It looks more like a womans practice jersey of some kind like basketball or track. If I would not have read the writing on it I would have not seen it as a Tress vest. Wonder if they could not use the real thing ? Just wondering.

      ssalumni

    • fportner said...

      I don 't often say this, but this kid (and sounded very young) really sucked! He could not articulate his reasoning for defnding ESpin's choice of covers or the allocations of words in the story itself. It was ALL about what would catch readers' attention, giving the time we are in. He also had no apparent depth to his knowledge of the subject matter about which he wrote, at least I could not discern it. I increasingly agree that there is little or no real professional journalism in that farse of a sports marketing company. Just seems to be what sells at any one time, baby!

      Maybe that is why he writes and does not speak. As for the cover, he is the wrong guy to argue what the cover is used. A reporter does not choose the cover story, the editors do. An editor would be the appropriate person to have asked that question.

      Again, I ask this, was there anything inaccurate in the story?

      tornado_zadar

    • I called and canceled my subscription to ESPN this morning. Couldn't take it anymore. I'm going to use this magazine to start my bonfire this weekend.

      buckeyebengal77

    • A complete hatchet job. This should not surprise anyone since ESPN is the biggest Buckeye basher of all time.

      Crazy Buckeye

    • His explanation of the cover made perfect sense to me. While I may not like it, they are doing their jobs (which is to sell as many magazines as possible). Personally, I think the staff writers at Bucknuts and the Dispatch do more to cast a negative light on this situation than the national press does. That is not a condemnation of them, but a reality check of the times we live in. I thought his comparison to Carolina basketball was a good analogy. We are getting more attention on this because we are an elite college program that most of the nation has interest in. It's our turn to take punches from the media on this, (and they are going to milk it for all its worth, for as long as they can). But IMO any perceived bias against the program is a testiment to OSU football's national prominence. It is simply a matter of more readers being interested in the trevails of Ohio State than those of UConn.

      This post was edited by RedE4Bucks2Rule on 5/24/2011 at 4:34 PM

      RedE4Bucks2Rule

    • tornado_zadar said...

      Maybe that is why he writes and does not speak. As for the cover, he is the wrong guy to argue what the cover is used. A reporter does not choose the cover story, the editors do. An editor would be the appropriate person to have asked that question.

      Again, I ask this, was there anything inaccurate in the story?

      The fact that the story is or is not inaccurate is not the point. The point people are trying to make is where is all the articles about Uconn, Tenn., USC etc.......

      gobucks72

    • Just got done listening to the FRR show -- that guy was full of $hit as far as saying it's about timing. He's just trying to cover up his employer's bias. As others have mentioned in this thread, you don't see the level of criticism (not even in the same zip code) toward blatant recruiting violations like Calhoun had or Bruce Pearl or the Newton scandal had when compared with Ohio State, and that is the issue. Scam Newton may be one of the older incidents when compared with all the things that have happened, but I would easily say it was the largest violation and the posterchild example of corruption in NCAA sports and the SEC conference as well. I also liked at the end how he tried to make more $hit up saying that Ohio State and the B10 were "saying things" about other schools at the time of the Scam Newton incident and Dave Biddle called him out in asking him what he had heard and he really couldn't produce any solid answers. The whole interview with this guy was just a sham, and exactly what I expected from an ESPiN employee.

      Razorback

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial