Online Now 2832

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

On this Board 1150
Record: 6110 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2642
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

A Dummies Guide To Appreciating Matta

  • I've just about had it with the ridiculous drivel spewing from the mouths/keyboards of people who generally have never played basketball, watched basketball, or given a shit about basketball.

    The only reason you care now is because Thad Matta has raised the level of play, excitement for the program, and expectations to a place where now you care and feel the need to critique what could be better regardless of being completely oblivious.

    So let's really get into this as I see there are 3 buckets of people.

    1- People who know we have a good thing and it's just a down year that many power programs have (aka normal and smart people)

    2- People who are complaining 10 months removed from a Final 4 appearance while we are ranked in the top 25 (aka dipshits)

    3- People in between but probably wouldn't be, but hey dipshits can be convincing (aka sheep)

    Let's start off with some history.

    2004/2005 - Inelegible team with very little talent. Team knocks off Illinois. Outperforms it's talent. Matta then closes huge recruiting class. Matta proves in under a year that he can coach up mediocre talent AND recruit a top level.

    2005/2006- Second year with a motley crew of flawed talents. Team earns a 2 seed. Almost a 1 seed. All 5 starters make huge strides. Team gets a tough draw versus a team that would put Hibbert and Jeff Green in the NBA. Hibbert neutralizes our best player and clock hits midnight. A 2 seed losing early looks bad, but March is all about the matchups. This season is another feather in the cap of Matta.

    2006/2007- We go to the title game and play arguably the best team over the last 15 years. Nuff said. Meanwhile another solid glass is lined up.

    2007/2008- Conley and Cook leaving really puts this team in the hole. They compete but lose tight games similar to this year. Have to play a lot of zone. Defensively soft....lack of chemistry. Silver lining- this team almost implodes but finds its way in March. Finish playing best basketball of the year. Another great recruiting class is teed up once again. Not his best work, but I gave Matta a passing grade here based on the fact the team hit its stride on the home stretch.

    2008/2009- Koufos leaves, Lighty gets hurt and Crater transfers. No depth, no point guard, and BJ Mullens proves to be a big project. Team rallies behind MUCH improved Lauderdale, Diebler, and Turner (none of which are big time recruits). Didn't have the horses but another team Matta has competing with top teams. Early exit in the tourney is a bit of a fluke mental breakdown. Given what we have, I'm fine with how this season played out. 2 straight years of defections and Lighty's injury really hurt.

    2009/2010- Turner moved to PG. His injury costs Buckeyes shot at 1 seed. Team is great but is on the back of Evan Turner who has a poor tournament game. People are bitter. So am I. Can't win the big game is now the default slight on Matta. Meanwhile another great recruiting class. This team was more of a 4-5 seed who played beyond their capabilities mostly due to Turner.

    2010/2011 - Best team ever. A joy to watch. Plays 1 bad game all year. It comes in the tournament. Can Matta not win the big one??????? Regardless another great recruiting class (on paper at least)

    2011-2012- We get to the Final 4. A poor second half keeps us out of a Championship game. Down year recruiting wise.

    2012- We are top 25 team in the best conference in the country with a tough schedule. Replacing our top 2 scorers is more difficult than imagined. Sophomore class doesn't improve as needed. Solid and great recruiting classes lined up.

    Now for some facts:

    Matta has had 8 full years. We qualify for tourney 6 of 7 years we are eligible which is on par with a top tier program. We are a 1 or 2 seed in 4 of those 7 years we are eligible with 2 final four appearances. Big 10 titles? Yeah we got those too.

    So let's start with this huey about not winning the big one. I am of the thought like many others that in sports, the playoffs (or at least the final rounds of the playoffs) are basically a crap shoot. In many ways the last 2-3 games are coin flips. Just getting to these coin flips is an achievement and we've won our fair share.

    Can't win the big one is just something the peanut gallery jumps on. We did it for Tressel before Oregon and Arkansas. You could say it for Belichick of late or Roy Williams and even Phil Jackson for the first half of their careers. Almost all coaches who can get to the big ones consistently and have just lost a couple in a row or 3 out of 4, or whatever can most definitely win the big ones, they've just run up against a good team with a good coach who just got the better of them.

    The losses to Kentucky and Tennessee stick out a bit, but both those teams played above expectations as has almost all Matta teams. For every painful loss there is probably 2x big wins that have somehow been wiped from your memory.

    Now for some reality:

    - We're not Duke or UNC. We don't have Dicky V with a huge erection promoting our school on ESPN. Michael Jordan did not go to school here and James Naismith is not buried here nor did John Wooden coach here. Our brand is football and a quick peak at the programs at Texas, Notre Dame, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia Tech, etc, shows we're doing pretty damn good job. If you don't think we're recruiting well or that it's an issue, I don't really know what I can tell you other than that you are a fucking moron. Yes recruiting has got tougher, but HELLO....the Big 10 has certainly improved a good deal the last 5 years. The people who bitch here the most are most likely 20 -30 years removed from having a Christmas list of expensive as toys when their parents were barely paying the mortgage and still complained when they got a pretty good haul of goods. In a perfect world, anyone who brings up us "missing" on Trey Burke going forward given should receive a sweet chin music kick to the face from HBK.

    - More than likely you don't know shit and I mean it like this:

    A year ago there was a large contingency of dipshits who thought benching Buford would be a good idea. Yes, his play was inconsistent but that would mean he would be on the bench in favor of sharpshooters like Thompson and Scott (remember this would be last year's version of those guys). Now there are people and some of the same people that are trying to tinker with the lineup to takeaway minutes from Scott and Thompson. Some even suggesting more minutes for Della Valle and Mcdonald. So yes....basically in this alternate universe Della Valle and Mcdonald > Scott and Thompson > William Buford a top ten in school history scorer.

    Then there are the people who freaked out that Matta has only won 47% of his games versus ranked opponents. Meanwhile Coach K is at 52%. Ohhhh the agony of having a coach who wins 1 less game out of 20 versus ranked opponents than the best coach in the game.

    The same people who freakout when we sign a big guy who days later becomes a top 100 recruit but flip out because at the time, he's not.

    Another case in point, people who scream bloody murder when Matta didn't call timeout our final possession versus Kentucky 2 years back. Hmmm somehow I don't recall this being an issue versus Xavier in the tourney.

    The fact of the matter is, essentially not knowing shit is one thing. Pretending your Jay Bilas when you don't know shit is another. A lot of this board just isn't familiar with basketball and that's beyond fine. But when we hit a tough patch and you try to grasp onto any small hint of a problem you can like it's the silver bullet to all of our problems and Matta is a moron for not implementing said solution, you look like an idiot.

    - Basketball is not football. There are not 85 scholarships. A miss, a transfer, a guy leaving early, an injury, etc.....all big time hits to the program and team. Even worse, these guys are WAY MORE high maintenance. They don't want to sit, don't want to wait, don't want to redshirt, don't want to play defense, don't want to pass, don't want to fight through screens, don't want to practice free throws, etc etc

    Matta runs a tight ship and yet we hold it against him. There is a reason guys have improved consistently under Matta and that's because he won't reward guys who aren't doing the little things. Shot selection, defense, effort, etc...... Matta is the reason guys FT shooting improves, lazy defenders become above average over time, and why we have one of the best defensive teams in the country. All this said, Matta being too rigid is held against him when blue chippers sit ahead of guys doing the little things right.

    - We're not going to do better than Matta. Maybe you can come up with 5 better coaches. But 10 aint happening and the guys on either list aren't coming here. When you're banging a chick out of your league part of the joy of that comes from KNOWING that you are banging a chick out of your league and not masturbating to Brazzers thinking what if....

    - This year's not even over and this team will be measured by it's post season play. The Big Ten is brutal this year and we have a tough schedule and didn't get the benefit with a solid test in the early season versus a top 25 marquette team. We had 3 moral type victories on the road against top teams in Michigan, Duke and MSU. If we won 2 of those games or all 3, we'd be singing a much different tune. On a neutral court we still have a punchers chance against many of the top 10 teams.

    I am just as frustrated as you guys about the last 4 games, but I have the sanity of context and perspective that even top programs have bumps in the road. Kentucky and UNC might not even make the tourney this year. Shit happens. Doesn't mean we have to burn someone at the stake. I'll take being a 1-2 seed every other year under Matta and you are bat shit crazy if you think better options and higher standards are warranted.

    If you can't enjoy/support the Matta era, then I don't know what to tell you. We should give you all your own message board area on bucknuts.

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • Most of us are mostly worried about the recruiting. The results on the court this year aren't shocking when you consider that we lost Buford and Sully.

    The recruiting is struggling right now and we're also letting instate talent get away.

    (for example): we stopped recruiting Gary Harris and Jeremy Holowell last year about halfway through the process and then only ended up signing Della Valle.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image

    cdubhondo

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image signature image

    Drummindrew03

  • TJMMBuckeyes said...

    Most of us are mostly worried about the recruiting. The results on the court this year aren't shocking when you consider that we lost Buford and Sully.

    The recruiting is struggling right now and we're also letting instate talent get away.

    (for example): we stopped recruiting Gary Harris and Jeremy Holowell last year about halfway through the process and then only ended up signing Della Valle.

    liberal usage of "most of us"

    Meanwhile the number 1 recruiting class in 2014 is off in the distance.

    What do you want Matta to do? If Gary Harris and Holowell don't want to come here, then on to the next one. I'm not thrilled with Della Valle either but it's an outlier of bad recruiting among mostly B or A..even A+ classes.

    When a chick tuns you down, yes you have to move on. You can't nag a women or Gary Harris or an employer who turns you down for a job into submission.

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    TheKnife

  • "liberal usage of "most of us"
    Meanwhile the number 1 recruiting class in 2014 is off in the distance.
    What do you want Matta to do? If Gary Harris and Holowell don't want to come here, then on to the next one. I'm not thrilled with Della Valle either but it's an outlier of bad recruiting among mostly B or A..even A+ classes.
    When a chick tuns you down, yes you have to move on. You can't nag a women or Gary Harris or an employer who turns you down for a job into submission."

    I meant "most of us" as in the ones that aren't happy with the current recruiting effort. You're really going to put stock into us having the number 1 2014 class when there's only 5 teams listed on 247's list? Our backup for Holowell and Harris was Della Valle? Really? Plus, I remember reading that we stopped recruiting/contacting Harris and Holowell about halfway through the process.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • Great post clap

    theville

  • TJMMBuckeyes said...

    "liberal usage of "most of us" Meanwhile the number 1 recruiting class in 2014 is off in the distance. What do you want Matta to do? If Gary Harris and Holowell don't want to come here, then on to the next one. I'm not thrilled with Della Valle either but it's an outlier of bad recruiting among mostly B or A..even A+ classes. When a chick tuns you down, yes you have to move on. You can't nag a women or Gary Harris or an employer who turns you down for a job into submission."

    I meant "most of us" as in the ones that aren't happy with the current recruiting effort. You're really going to put stock into us having the number 1 2014 class when there's only 5 teams listed on 247's list? Our backup for Holowell and Harris was Della Valle? Really? Plus, I remember reading that we stopped recruiting/contacting Harris and Holowell about halfway through the process.

    You are the Christmas list poster spoiled brat I speak of.

    I believe Matta has had top 5 classes almost half of his years here.

    We get it by now. Della Valle isn't up to snuff and WE MISSED ON Trey Burke/ SKY IS FALLING.

    Meanwhile: Oden, Conley, Cook, Koufos, Diebler, Turner, Lighty, Buford, Sullinger, Mullens, Thomas, Craft, etc etc.

    Seriously...shove the recruiting argument up your ass.

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • I don't know what to say, I've been Urbanized. Btw, you know your 2014 class argument is irrelevant. There's 5 teams on the 247 list lol

    This post was edited by TJMMBuckeyes on 2/18/2013 at 8:39 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • Everything you say about Matta recruiting is rendered irrelevant. Entered into evidence on "Matta can't recruit"

    2006 -2
    http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?cid=678067

    2007 -6
    http://rivalshoops.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=910&CID=549097

    2008 -2
    http://scouthoops.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p=3&c=2008Top25Classes

    2010- 1
    http://basketballrecruiting.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=980235

    2011-3
    http://www.maxpreps.com/news/s1_b1GrJEeCkhgAcxJSkrA/top-25-college-basketball-team-recruiting-rankings.htm

    2014
    early but number one.

    Seriously I'd rather argue that cigarettes are bad for your health than the recruiting history.

    This post was edited by bennybuckeye on 2/18/2013 at 8:46 PM

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • He was a helluva recruiter. Oden, Conley, Cook, Turner, Mullens, etc.

    The back has killed his recruiting. 2012 was terrible and 2013 is doing nothing to replace DT's offensive production.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    SingaporeBuck

  • TJMMBuckeyes said...

    He was a helluva recruiter. Oden, Conley, Cook, Turner, Mullens, etc.

    The back has killed his recruiting. 2012 was terrible and 2013 is doing nothing to replace DT's offensive production.

    Using Matta's back as the scapegoat. Didn't think you stock could get any lower with me.

    I just generally feel it's arrogant and wreaks of bullshit when people call out Matta, especially for recruiting.

    We're not traditionally a tier 1 program. Matta has us at that level and its mainly because of recruiting.

    We have been so spoiled recruiting wise, we've had guys leave early, guys who can play transfer, and sent a lot of guys to the league or abroad.

    Historically look at the Matta era compared to anything else over the last 40 years....This is a sustained stretch of competitive play at the highest level, generated mostly by a nice blend of top tier recruits and lesser role players we develop. Looking at the 2014 class and what we currently have, I can't see why anyone feels the need to go barking up this tree when we hit a bump in the road or land a player we don't find worthy.

    It's fucking ridiculous to be honest.

    But going to the Matta is damaged goods and so is our program really grinds my gears. Our program wouldn't be anywhere near where it is if if it wasn't for him and specifically his recruiting, work ethic, and commitment to it.

    The majority of this board probably wanted Bobby Knight, now sipping on beer while broadcasting for ESPN. We're on the map because of Matta and to connect the dots that the clock has struck midnight because of one off class and health problems is beyond tacky.

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image

    Follow me on twitter: @OSUCavsfan89

    Cavsfan89

  • bennybuckeye said...

    I've just about had it with the ridiculous drivel spewing from the mouths/keyboards of people who generally have never played basketball, watched basketball, or given a shit about basketball.

    The only reason you care now is because Thad Matta has raised the level of play, excitement for the program, and expectations to a place where now you care and feel the need to critique what could be better regardless of being completely oblivious.

    So let's really get into this as I see there are 3 buckets of people.

    1- People who know we have a good thing and it's just a down year that many power programs have (aka normal and smart people)

    2- People who are complaining 10 months removed from a Final 4 appearance while we are ranked in the top 25 (aka dipshits)

    3- People in between but probably wouldn't be, but hey dipshits can be convincing (aka sheep)

    Let's start off with some history.

    2004/2005 - Inelegible team with very little talent. Team knocks off Illinois. Outperforms it's talent. Matta then closes huge recruiting class. Matta proves in under a year that he can coach up mediocre talent AND recruit a top level.

    2005/2006- Second year with a motley crew of flawed talents. Team earns a 2 seed. Almost a 1 seed. All 5 starters make huge strides. Team gets a tough draw versus a team that would put Hibbert and Jeff Green in the NBA. Hibbert neutralizes our best player and clock hits midnight. A 2 seed losing early looks bad, but March is all about the matchups. This season is another feather in the cap of Matta.

    2006/2007- We go to the title game and play arguably the best team over the last 15 years. Nuff said. Meanwhile another solid glass is lined up.

    2007/2008- Conley and Cook leaving really puts this team in the hole. They compete but lose tight games similar to this year. Have to play a lot of zone. Defensively soft....lack of chemistry. Silver lining- this team almost implodes but finds its way in March. Finish playing best basketball of the year. Another great recruiting class is teed up once again. Not his best work, but I gave Matta a passing grade here based on the fact the team hit its stride on the home stretch.

    2008/2009- Koufos leaves, Lighty gets hurt and Crater transfers. No depth, no point guard, and BJ Mullens proves to be a big project. Team rallies behind MUCH improved Lauderdale, Diebler, and Turner (none of which are big time recruits). Didn't have the horses but another team Matta has competing with top teams. Early exit in the tourney is a bit of a fluke mental breakdown. Given what we have, I'm fine with how this season played out. 2 straight years of defections and Lighty's injury really hurt.

    2009/2010- Turner moved to PG. His injury costs Buckeyes shot at 1 seed. Team is great but is on the back of Evan Turner who has a poor tournament game. People are bitter. So am I. Can't win the big game is now the default slight on Matta. Meanwhile another great recruiting class. This team was more of a 4-5 seed who played beyond their capabilities mostly due to Turner.

    2010/2011 - Best team ever. A joy to watch. Plays 1 bad game all year. It comes in the tournament. Can Matta not win the big one??????? Regardless another great recruiting class (on paper at least)

    2011-2012- We get to the Final 4. A poor second half keeps us out of a Championship game. Down year recruiting wise.

    2012- We are top 25 team in the best conference in the country with a tough schedule. Replacing our top 2 scorers is more difficult than imagined. Sophomore class doesn't improve as needed. Solid and great recruiting classes lined up.

    Now for some facts:

    Matta has had 8 full years. We qualify for tourney 6 of 7 years we are eligible which is on par with a top tier program. We are a 1 or 2 seed in 4 of those 7 years we are eligible with 2 final four appearances. Big 10 titles? Yeah we got those too.

    So let's start with this huey about not winning the big one. I am of the thought like many others that in sports, the playoffs (or at least the final rounds of the playoffs) are basically a crap shoot. In many ways the last 2-3 games are coin flips. Just getting to these coin flips is an achievement and we've won our fair share.

    Can't win the big one is just something the peanut gallery jumps on. We did it for Tressel before Oregon and Arkansas. You could say it for Belichick of late or Roy Williams and even Phil Jackson for the first half of their careers. Almost all coaches who can get to the big ones consistently and have just lost a couple in a row or 3 out of 4, or whatever can most definitely win the big ones, they've just run up against a good team with a good coach who just got the better of them.

    The losses to Kentucky and Tennessee stick out a bit, but both those teams played above expectations as has almost all Matta teams. For every painful loss there is probably 2x big wins that have somehow been wiped from your memory.

    Now for some reality:

    - We're not Duke or UNC. We don't have Dicky V with a huge erection promoting our school on ESPN. Michael Jordan did not go to school here and James Naismith is not buried here nor did John Wooden coach here. Our brand is football and a quick peak at the programs at Texas, Notre Dame, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia Tech, etc, shows we're doing pretty damn good job. If you don't think we're recruiting well or that it's an issue, I don't really know what I can tell you other than that you are a fucking moron. Yes recruiting has got tougher, but HELLO....the Big 10 has certainly improved a good deal the last 5 years. The people who bitch here the most are most likely 20 -30 years removed from having a Christmas list of expensive as toys when their parents were barely paying the mortgage and still complained when they got a pretty good haul of goods. In a perfect world, anyone who brings up us "missing" on Trey Burke going forward given should receive a sweet chin music kick to the face from HBK.

    - More than likely you don't know shit and I mean it like this:

    A year ago there was a large contingency of dipshits who thought benching Buford would be a good idea. Yes, his play was inconsistent but that would mean he would be on the bench in favor of sharpshooters like Thompson and Scott (remember this would be last year's version of those guys). Now there are people and some of the same people that are trying to tinker with the lineup to takeaway minutes from Scott and Thompson. Some even suggesting more minutes for Della Valle and Mcdonald. So yes....basically in this alternate universe Della Valle and Mcdonald > Scott and Thompson > William Buford a top ten in school history scorer.

    Then there are the people who freaked out that Matta has only won 47% of his games versus ranked opponents. Meanwhile Coach K is at 52%. Ohhhh the agony of having a coach who wins 1 less game out of 20 versus ranked opponents than the best coach in the game.

    The same people who freakout when we sign a big guy who days later becomes a top 100 recruit but flip out because at the time, he's not.

    Another case in point, people who scream bloody murder when Matta didn't call timeout our final possession versus Kentucky 2 years back. Hmmm somehow I don't recall this being an issue versus Xavier in the tourney.

    The fact of the matter is, essentially not knowing shit is one thing. Pretending your Jay Bilas when you don't know shit is another. A lot of this board just isn't familiar with basketball and that's beyond fine. But when we hit a tough patch and you try to grasp onto any small hint of a problem you can like it's the silver bullet to all of our problems and Matta is a moron for not implementing said solution, you look like an idiot.

    - Basketball is not football. There are not 85 scholarships. A miss, a transfer, a guy leaving early, an injury, etc.....all big time hits to the program and team. Even worse, these guys are WAY MORE high maintenance. They don't want to sit, don't want to wait, don't want to redshirt, don't want to play defense, don't want to pass, don't want to fight through screens, don't want to practice free throws, etc etc

    Matta runs a tight ship and yet we hold it against him. There is a reason guys have improved consistently under Matta and that's because he won't reward guys who aren't doing the little things. Shot selection, defense, effort, etc...... Matta is the reason guys FT shooting improves, lazy defenders become above average over time, and why we have one of the best defensive teams in the country. All this said, Matta being too rigid is held against him when blue chippers sit ahead of guys doing the little things right.

    - We're not going to do better than Matta. Maybe you can come up with 5 better coaches. But 10 aint happening and the guys on either list aren't coming here. When you're banging a chick out of your league part of the joy of that comes from KNOWING that you are banging a chick out of your league and not masturbating to Brazzers thinking what if....

    - This year's not even over and this team will be measured by it's post season play. The Big Ten is brutal this year and we have a tough schedule and didn't get the benefit with a solid test in the early season versus a top 25 marquette team. We had 3 moral type victories on the road against top teams in Michigan, Duke and MSU. If we won 2 of those games or all 3, we'd be singing a much different tune. On a neutral court we still have a punchers chance against many of the top 10 teams.

    I am just as frustrated as you guys about the last 4 games, but I have the sanity of context and perspective that even top programs have bumps in the road. Kentucky and UNC might not even make the tourney this year. Shit happens. Doesn't mean we have to burn someone at the stake. I'll take being a 1-2 seed every other year under Matta and you are bat shit crazy if you think better options and higher standards are warranted.

    If you can't enjoy/support the Matta era, then I don't know what to tell you. We should give you all your own message board area on bucknuts.

    great freaking post...that took restraintthumbsup

    Seeing is believing

    bollmanisaturd

  • I will wade into the waters, I have said from early on in his tenure that Thad absolutely is a top ten recruiter, as benny and his research bears out
    Benny you must admit that Thad and his top notch recruiting ability was dealt a great hand by the utter destruction of the IU program, yes he was able to get Oden and Conley but I do not think any of us would say that IU being down did not help him get those guys as well as Thomas at least to some degree, if that was not a great help, please show me the other successes from Indiana in Thad's tenure, am I wrong in saying that Offutt may be the only other recruit from Indiana?
    Be that is it may, I still say that the top ten recruiter is an out of the top 25 game day coach, I have been on record in this forum and consistent in this criticism of Thad, so, benny, show me the error of my ways, you did a crack up job on the recruiting front so I await your well researched response.
    I must admit that this seems to be a repeat of the JT era, either you get in line with this being the golden era of OSU football and JT can do no wrong or you get the wrath of most this board, as I was with JT, my criticism of Thad does not mean that I hate him, want him run out of town on a rail, or who else could you get responses, I want those who blindly support Thad to think critically or watch his game day coaching and think about what has or is happening and how we react and compare that to other coaches, or pick your own experienced commentator that you feel is intelligent in the game and see what they have to say.
    I know that I will most likely get pummeled but that is OK because the thoughtful expression of ideas is usually good for learning

    roxannereggie

  • roxannereggie said...

    I will wade into the waters, I have said from early on in his tenure that Thad absolutely is a top ten recruiter, as benny and his research bears out Benny you must admit that Thad and his top notch recruiting ability was dealt a great hand by the utter destruction of the IU program, yes he was able to get Oden and Conley but I do not think any of us would say that IU being down did not help him get those guys as well as Thomas at least to some degree, if that was not a great help, please show me the other successes from Indiana in Thad's tenure, am I wrong in saying that Offutt may be the only other recruit from Indiana? Be that is it may, I still say that the top ten recruiter is an out of the top 25 game day coach, I have been on record in this forum and consistent in this criticism of Thad, so, benny, show me the error of my ways, you did a crack up job on the recruiting front so I await your well researched response. I must admit that this seems to be a repeat of the JT era, either you get in line with this being the golden era of OSU football and JT can do no wrong or you get the wrath of most this board, as I was with JT, my criticism of Thad does not mean that I hate him, want him run out of town on a rail, or who else could you get responses, I want those who blindly support Thad to think critically or watch his game day coaching and think about what has or is happening and how we react and compare that to other coaches, or pick your own experienced commentator that you feel is intelligent in the game and see what they have to say. I know that I will most likely get pummeled but that is OK because the thoughtful expression of ideas is usually good for learning

    your opinion is fine. I criticize Thad all the time.

    Rotation, minutes distribution, timeout usage, no usage of zone or presses, and not embracing certain guys skillsets.

    That type of specific criticism rooted in keen observation and perspective is fine and is in most cases warranted. Still though for every 2-3 minor legitimate gripes we have, we're ignoring a dozen fundamentals that we do the right way.

    signature image

    check out bloguin.com or awfulannouncing.com. Follow me @bkoo on twitter.

    bennybuckeye

  • Two things I would add -

    1. In the locker room after the 2006 loss to Georgetown, a Buckeye senior told his then dumpy little brother, "Jared, if you ever get a chance to play for that man, you do it." Jared Sullinger did. Jon Diebler told his best friend to make sure his little brother went to OSU, and Aaron Craft did. Deshaun Thomas decided on, and stayed at, OSU because he believed they cared and would help him improve. As great as Coach Matta's record is on the court, his record with his players, guiding them through school and sports and who knows what else, is probably better.

    2. It would be great if fans who have cared about OSU basketball for five days or five years or five decades could express a point of view like, "I think they should play zone," or "How could they miss Trey Burke?" or "I wish Shannon Scott was starting because ..." and receive a rational counter argument, without being labeled "Matta haters."

    LeeCaryer

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    BuckeyeKeg

  • bennybuckeye said...

    your opinion is fine. I criticize Thad all the time.

    Rotation, minutes distribution, timeout usage, no usage of zone or presses, and not embracing certain guys skillsets.

    That type of specific criticism rooted in keen observation and perspective is fine and is in most cases warranted. Still though for every 2-3 minor legitimate gripes we have, we're ignoring a dozen fundamentals that we do the right way.

    benny, am right with you then
    as Lee points out, thad has many more pluses than minuses but he does IMO and to me the most glaring are the things you mentioned
    and if you ever had the chance to speak with those close to me i have been harping on such things since the beginning, under Thad OSU has had the most pathetic in bounds plays in college bball----that is all about coaching and it drives me crazy, and a lob to Thompson does not move the meter, have seen some improvement this year but still lacking, and I will say that ever since his hiring I never liked his offensive philosophy of what I call a one in and four out type offense, Sully was perfect for this offense but big men with his type of offensive skill sets are nearly impossible to find and we are currently seeing what an offensive challenged big man gets you with his philosophy, as well as with the four out you put a large emphasis on outside shooting, and we are seeing what a lack of a true shooter or shooters will get you----well a top ten coach evaluates his players skill sets and adjusts accordingly--I do not see much of this happening and in my book that downgrades his game day prowess

    roxannereggie

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    BuckeyeKeg

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    roxannereggie

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    SingaporeBuck

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    roxannereggie