In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 2181
Online now 2218 Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)
The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes
Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes
If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here
Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
I miss my Kate Upton Picture
Agree with Bax, the most important criteria should be body of work...i.e. strength of schedule/ quality of wins/ quality of losses. Computers are pretty good at measuring this part.
I do think there should be some element for lack of a better phrase of 'who do you think would win'. Comparing Stanford and Oregon is another good way of looking at this (and yet another example of why I don't think conference champion is a good criteria).
Argument for Stanford over Oregon:
* beat Oregon
* playing better now that Hogan is starting QB
* 2nd loss was a controversial call in OT on the road against the #1 team
* played slightly tougher conference slate than Oregon - having played UCLA
Argument for Oregon:
* only 1 loss, Stanford has 2, including a loss to now unranked Washington
* slaughtered common opponents that Stanford squeaked by (ex Arizona, Wash St, Oregon St.)
* no close wins, in fact the only win which wasn't a blowout was on the road against against USC by 11 points
All in all I could argue a pretty equivalent body of work (computers have Oregon 1 slot better than Stanford), but if they were to play again on a neutral field I think Oregon would win this time by a narrow margin.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports