-
rugbybuckeye said...
Didn't say you weren't right about those two plays, I am saying our defensive problem is more complicated than firing Fickell. Did you not hear what Urban's reasoning were??? He said the have fine coaches but EVERYONE needs to get better and that we are thin as hell in the back 7, PLUS, are frosh LBers are lost. It's scheme, philosophy, attrition and youth that is making our defense as difficult to watch as our offense was last year...
-
jacraigo said...
Do you seriously think its that simple to fix things? Do you really think you're seeing things that the coaches haven't? Is it maybe possible that you don't really know the whole story about what the problems have been with the attempts to fix the defensive shortcomings? When things seem so obvious you can bet they're not.
This post was edited by Duplic8tor on 10/15/2012 at 10:47 PM
-
mortuarybuck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
596 votes total - (859)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
mortuarybuck said...
I agree with your breakdown with the plays but do not agree that Fickell' is not seeing it. I think that the players are not seeing it and that is why he is so frustrated. Football is a game of inches especially when you are not athletically superior. If you need to drop 6 yards to a hole and you drop 7 and let a speed WR under you you end up with a touchdown. I don't doubt for one min the coaches don't see it. The question is what adjustments in game plan are they going to make if the players aren't seeing it?
-
jacraigo said...
Not "easy" but its "elementary"... OK.... Again my point was if you can see it, the coaches can and have seen it. These are experienced football guys. I'm saying the solutions are probably much more complicated than you make this out to be. I have no solution because I'm not in practice every day and have no idea what the player challenges are to making this better. Nor do you so as I said, I'm sure there's a lot more to it than you think.
This post was edited by Duplic8tor on 10/15/2012 at 10:55 PM
-
rugbybuckeye said...
Didn't say you weren't right about those two plays, I am saying our defensive problem is more complicated than firing Fickell. Did you not hear what Urban's reasoning were??? He said the have fine coaches but EVERYONE needs to get better and that we are thin as hell in the back 7, PLUS, are frosh LBers are lost. It's scheme, philosophy, attrition and youth that is making our defense as difficult to watch as our offense was last year...
-
Duplic8tor said...
I'm not trying to disagree with you. Fact is, I understand what you're saying. But, if we subscribe to what you're saying... that there is an "unknown" somewhere that no one would understand unless you are named Fickell or Withers, then there is no point in having this discussion. Let's just see if they "see it" this Saturday.
Fact is, respectfully, I disagree with your assumption there is some unknown. Why? Because they plugged in a FB to play LB at The Ohio State University. Has that ever been done in my lifetime? Not to my knowledge. This tells me they don't know what to do other than put guys on the field that want to make a play. And props to Boren for that. What is lighting up this entire board, not just this topic, is that Fickell IS DOING NOTHING DIFFERENT. An earlier post adequately stated we made NO adjustments at halftime and the defense Indiana saw in the first half, they shredded even more in the second half because of it. That is not personnel. That is not injuries. That is not Meyer (because he hasn't yet snatched the reigns from Fickell and/or Withers). THAT is our DC's.
-
jacraigo said...
I'm merely stating that the players may not be able to change to the schemes you're suggesting as easily as you think. With all the LB injuries that apparently occurred last week and the inability to practice, changes may have been seriously limited. No mystical unknown but we shouldn't be so sure of our condemnation without having all the facts. I am as frustrated as you about the continuing ineptitude of this group but I think there's plenty of blame to go around - and none of it helpful.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by Duplic8tor on 10/15/2012 at 11:33 PM
-
Duplic8tor said...
Fair enough. However, the only facts that need to be known are: 49 points, 500 yards of offense. And it wasn't an aberration. It is a trend. Here's how I had to isolate the problem:
INJURIES - If you think injuries are the main problem, fine. That would be easy to prove if earlier games almost all of them didn't have similar or same results. We've given up 2,800 yards of offense to the tune of 400 yards per game. That would place us 10th out of 12 in defense in the B1G which doesn't have any teams other than us in the top 25. Ahemm....
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
sarasotabcg
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1428 votes total - (1429)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
'We are attacking that like animals right now.'
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
sarasotabcg
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1428 votes total - (1429)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
mortuarybuck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
596 votes total - (859)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Refresh




FRR: Why Is The Defense Inept?