Online Now 2256

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

On this Board 997
Record: 6110 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2271
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Final Edit: Police

  • I believe that being disrepected, name called, generally harassed, all types of lesser, non-criminal forms of being wronged happen relatively frequently. And if that seems unthinkable to anyone, they should think about what demographics of the population they fit into. Socio/economic class and age have a lot to do with how people are treated by the police and how the people they know are treated.

    I'm not defending any cop who is disrespectful, calls people names or harasses anyone. But I do want to point out a couple things. First, to say it happens frequently is an over-exaggeration at best. Second, cops are the victims of disrespect and name calling far more often then they are the perpetrators. Finally, class and age are not nearly as big a deal as you think they may be in terms of how cops treat people. I'm not going to say cops treat everyone of every age and every class the same, but nor should they. Why should everyone be treated the same when we are all different? That doesn't mean to say cops should treat people unfairly, but until we are all the same, we should all be treated differently.

    GreyMatter

  • GreyMatter said...

    Finally, class and age are not nearly as big a deal as you think they may be in terms of how cops treat people.

    Can I ask what you base that statement on?

    gtownbuckeye

  • gtownbuckeye said...

    Can I ask what you base that statement on?

    16 years of experience.

    GreyMatter

  • GreyMatter said...

    16 years of experience.

    I don't know what you mean, I wasn't being a dick. Are you a police officer?

    gtownbuckeye

  • BALLJACK said...

    OK to simplify. How do you as a citizen, business, home, property owner feel about the current state of our law enforcement. Do you feel like the police work for the government or the people?

    OK then, as someone who owns a home near Public Housing, I thank God every day that we have a good Police Department here in San Francisco. Public Housing is not necessarily a bad thing. Many who live there are deserving and generally need assistance. However, a few bad apples who participate in gang violence require a strong police presence. The shootings have settled down for the most part. However, there is the occasional instance a block or two away. I thank God there are cops, and I no longer drive like a mad man.

    I feel Sullinger should show up in court and contest the speeding ticket. The particular officer had a bug up his #^%.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Buckeye Fan Since 1970!!! Go Bucks!!!

    SFBuckeyeFan

  • gtownbuckeye said...

    I don't know what you mean, I wasn't being a dick. Are you a police officer?

    Oh I know you weren't. I took no offense at all from your question...perfectly legit one. And yes, I am.

    GreyMatter

  • you also hear all the time about women who called the police, the guy was picked up, held for for a few hours and then released to come right back home only now even more pissed off, so the women don't call the next time it happens.

    In Ohio, you do not go to jail for a couple hours and then go home. You must stay overnight until being seen by a judge.

    BuckI 4 eva48549

  • Gotcha. My experience has been different. Not that I've had many bad experiences with police officers at all, and I certaintly don't expect police to operator in a vacuum and treat everyone the same, but I have been treated with very wide ranging levels of basic respect, and that's something that I do think should be uniform. I'm 30 yrs old, and when I'm in jeans and a t-shirt/hoodie vs. when I'm in a suit for work, I've gotten less respect. I've also worked with a lot of older (like 50's-60's), rich, entitled people, and seen them interact with and talk to police officers in ways that I WOULD NEVER DREAM OF without expecting to landing myself in jail. I've seen them given deference that I will likely never be shown and I don't think that should be the case. Those are just my experiences coming from Cleveland where I grew up, D.C. where I went to school and NYC where I currently live. NYC police have actually been the most consistent, whereas far eastside of Cleveland (Gates Mills, Hunting Valley, etc...) were where I had some of the worst experiences. You would've thought me and my 1986 Toyata Cressida were on a Bolo.

    gtownbuckeye

  • gtownbuckeye said...

    Out of serious curiosity, what do you consider being "genuinely wronged by a cop"? I ask because that's a subjective statement. Not that there are so many people that have been framed or Rodney Kinged by the police (although I'm guessing that there's more than people would like to believe), but I believe that being disrepected, name called, generally harassed, all types of lesser, non-criminal forms of being wronged happen relatively frequently. And if that seems unthinkable to anyone, they should think about what demographics of the population they fit into. Socio/economic class and age have a lot to do with how people are treated by the police and how the people they know are treated.

    I just feel like there is this dismissive way that people like to assume that all people that don't look at all cops as heroes or have some reservations about the police must be criminals or don't like getting tickets. That notion is clearly reinforced when someone posts something ridiculous like "I don't like cops because they took my weed", but the mentality that if someone has a problem with or complains about the police they must be a criminal/unappreciative/anarchist is what helps the cops that aren't good people continue to do what they do without being checked.

    gtown, I consider several of the examples you listed as "genuinely wronged by a cop." I would also include being stopped or detained based on your race or even appearance, being arrested for a minor crime or property crime when reporting as a victim of violent crime, having an officer lie about what happened, an officer uses excessive force against you, an officer plants evidence against you, having your call for aid be ignored by an officer as a few more examples.

    I agree that socio/economic class and age and other factors have a lot to do with how cops treat people. I also believe the level of respect demonstrated towards an officer has an equal amount to do with how individuals are treated by cops. Although professionals and required to be incredibly thick-skinned, cops are human beings dealing frequently with dangerous situations.

    I disagree with you that "being disprespected, name called, generally harassed, all types of lesser, non-criminal forms of being wronged happen relatively frequently." In my experience as a prosecutor, if this is occurring, or if questionable stops are occuring, shoddy investigating with evidence being mishandled, etc., the prosecutors and the judges start recognizing the weak links fairly quickly. That is because we scrutinze the cases and also because the clients are telling their attorneys what happened and motions start getting filed and it rather quickly turns into an obvious problem with a particular officer. That gets back to law enforcement hierarchy pretty quick because prosecutors and judges don't like incompetent or bad cops tainting cases. Similarly, cops that go around regularly doing what you described will soon have a personnel file full of complaints and that isn't going last long either.

    I have no doubt cops make these types of mistakes regularly for various reasons, but in my experience it is the exception not the norm. And in my experience if you treat cops with respect, you will be treated respectfully in return.

    TheKnife

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now
    signature image

    Still not catching the ever-contagious WHINE-FLU!!!

    BBell901

  • TheKnife said...

    I disagree with you that "being disprespected, name called, generally harassed, all types of lesser, non-criminal forms of being wronged happen relatively frequently." In my experience as a prosecutor, if this is occurring, or if questionable stops are occuring, shoddy investigating with evidence being mishandled, etc., the prosecutors and the judges start recognizing the weak links fairly quickly. That is because we scrutinze the cases and also because the clients are telling their attorneys what happened and motions start getting filed and it rather quickly turns into an obvious problem with a particular officer. That gets back to law enforcement hierarchy pretty quick because prosecutors and judges don't like incompetent or bad cops tainting cases. Similarly, cops that go around regularly doing what you described will soon have a personnel file full of complaints and that isn't going last long either.

    I have no doubt cops make these types of mistakes regularly for various reasons, but in my experience it is the exception not the norm. And in my experience if you treat cops with respect, you will be treated respectfully in return.

    I think part of it is just semantics. I say "frequently", you say "regularly" and it represents a gap in assumption as to how often it happens, but I don't think we're at opposite ends of the spectrum. Also, when I say frequently, I don't mean the majority of the time. I mean that there are daily hundreds of thousands of interactions between police and civilians and I'm 100% sure that things like what I described are a daily occurance. What percentage I wouldn't even guess at, certaintly nowhere close to 50%, but I think it happens often enough for me to claim frequently.

    But I do think you are over estimating the number people that are willing to file complaints, especially on relatively minor things. Most people are just going to be like "that was some bullshit..." and keep it moving. I don't think a police officer being disrespectful and an officer being shoddy with evidence are comparable, and you as a prosecutor are about 100X more likely to find out that a cop is tampering with evidence then you are to find out that he's being a disrespectful jackass, especially if it's happening to younger people or some other marginalized group.

    Most people if they're told to shut the f-up by a police officer, they're just gonna shut the f-up. Planting evidence, I agree, that would be under a microscope. Questionable stops though? Not if they're not even giving tickets. If they're just stopping people and making it clear that they aren't welcome in that neighborhood, no one is gonna file a complaint on that. I've never even thought about filing a formal complaint against a cop, and frankly most of the time, even when they've been a dick, a complaint isn't actually warranted. Me thinking that a cop was rude, and me thinking I know why he was rude specifically to me, doesn't amount to a complaint 99.9% of the time, nor should it. If your civil rights are still intact, you keep it moving.

    Even the times where I feel like I could've filed a complaint, I never really considered it, and I feel like I'm in the majority on that. I've had an officer tell me and my friends to get out of the car, get back in the car, get out of the car again, and then told me to not come around, all without giving me a ticket or saying why I was even stopped in the first place. That complaint just was not going to be filed.

    But again, my issue was with your the categorization of who "most people that have a problem with the police" are. You don't think my description of "frequently" is accurate and I don't think your description of people that have a problem with the police are or the notion that only a few people have truly had bad interactions with the police is accurate.

    gtownbuckeye

  • gtownbuckeye said...

    I think part of it is just semantics. I say "frequently", you say "regularly" and it represents a gap in assumption as to how often it happens, but I don't think we're at opposite ends of the spectrum. Also, when I say frequently, I don't mean the majority of the time. I mean that there are daily hundreds of thousands of interactions between police and civilians and I'm 100% sure that things like what I described are a daily occurance. What percentage I wouldn't even guess at, certaintly nowhere close to 50%, but I think it happens often enough for me to claim frequently.

    But I do think you are over estimating the number people that are willing to file complaints, especially on relatively minor things. Most people are just going to be like "that was some bullshit..." and keep it moving. I don't think a police officer being disrespectful and an officer being shoddy with evidence are comparable, and you as a prosecutor are about 100X more likely to find out that a cop is tampering with evidence then you are to find out that he's being a disrespectful jackass, especially if it's happening to younger people or some other marginalized group.

    Most people if they're told to shut the f-up by a police officer, they're just gonna shut the f-up. Planting evidence, I agree, that would be under a microscope. Questionable stops though? Not if they're not even giving tickets. If they're just stopping people and making it clear that they aren't welcome in that neighborhood, no one is gonna file a complaint on that. I've never even thought about filing a formal complaint against a cop, and frankly most of the time, even when they've been a dick, a complaint isn't actually warranted. Me thinking that a cop was rude, and me thinking I know why he was rude specifically to me, doesn't amount to a complaint 99.9% of the time, nor should it. If your civil rights are still intact, you keep it moving.

    Even the times where I feel like I could've filed a complaint, I never really considered it, and I feel like I'm in the majority on that. I've had an officer tell me and my friends to get out of the car, get back in the car, get out of the car again, and then told me to not come around, all without giving me a ticket or saying why I was even stopped in the first place. That complaint just was not going to be filed.

    But again, my issue was with your the categorization of who "most people that have a problem with the police" are. You don't think my description of "frequently" is accurate and I don't think your description of people that have a problem with the police are or the notion that only a few people have truly had bad interactions with the police is accurate.

    Because you don't fall into my generalization. Makes sense. I know my perspective is based on my life experience, same as you. My life experience sounds different than yours. And for the past 10 years virtually 99% of the people I deal with deserved to encounter the police, most fell in my categories 1-4, but most of them probably felt they belonged in my category 5. I frequently remark to my wife how pleasant it is to go to a social function in the community and see that our city isn't such the sh-hole I thought it was based on the portion of the community that I encounter day in and day out. It is even worse for law enforcement because they don't have the buffer that I get. The original post was how do you feel about law enforcement. I don't feel it is even remotely as bad as some people make it out to be, especially those bitching because they got caught violating the law, but I am also well aware based on cases I have seen that several of your points are valid. I want people to be treated equally and with respect, and I feel that the vast majority of law enforcement officers really try to do it that way.

    TheKnife

  • Well, I think I've pushed my luck with this conversation about as far as I could. Really impressed that this never devolved. theKnife, GrayMatter, keep doing what you're doing, you sound like 2 of the many good ones. And I really do feel where you guys are coming from. I have a cousin who was a prosecutor in Cleveland Heights, one that was a homicide detective in East Cleveland, an Uncle that's been on the Muni bench in Cleveland for about 30 years and have worked on criminal cases pro bono myself. Be easy. Go Bucks.

    gtownbuckeye

  • gtownbuckeye said...

    Well, I think I've pushed my luck with this conversation about as far as I could. Really impressed that this never devolved. theKnife, GrayMatter, keep doing what you're doing, you sound like 2 of the many good ones. And I really do feel where you guys are coming from. I have a cousin who was a prosecutor in Cleveland Heights, one that was a homicide detective in East Cleveland, an Uncle that's been on the Muni bench in Cleveland for about 30 years and have worked on criminal cases pro bono myself. Be easy. Go Bucks.

    Thanks. And seriously, if you live in central Ohio and ever want to do a ride along with a CPD officer, let me know and I will set it up for you. I work on a pretty busy precinct with some really good officers...I think you'll enjoy yourself. And it's always interesting to see things from a different perspective.

    Have a safe and happy 4th!

    GreyMatter