-
drmiller166
- 5 stars Rating: 92
5317 votes total - (2966)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
Buckeye2001
- 5 stars Rating: 86
1455 votes total - (1641)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
WoodyHayes1951
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2607 votes total - (1816)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
FlaBuckeye1
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1754 votes total - (3489)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BuckeyeFreak said...
As a conference, I'm not sure the Big Ten can consistently be better than the SEC. Coaches aside, the SEC has several advantages:
1. Fertile recruiting areas...Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, the Carolinas, Louisiana, etc. With the addition of A&M, they'll probably be in Texas even more. The Big Ten basically has Ohio and Penn.
2. Oversigning. Not everyone does it but many, including 'Bama and LSU, do. They basically sign the equivalent of 5 classes in 4 years...and find creative ways to get rid of those that don't pan out.
3. Lots of cheating, lots of of cover up.
4. Generally speaking, they let in any recruit and find ways to keep them eligible.
5. The state of Florida, and I believe others, have spring practice. Players are more ready from the start.However, OSU doesn't really need the Big Ten. Florida State (ACC) and Miami (Big East) played in worse conferences back when they were great and it didn't hurt them one bit. Other than not being the 1-loss team to "get in," I don't see the Big Ten actually hurting OSU. When push comes to shove, I could care less about the Big Ten...it's all about the Buckeyes!
- This post is for members of Bucknuts or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
- This post is for members of Bucknuts or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial












Ohio State and the B1G Dilemma!!