- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
BuckeyeSteves
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5650 votes total - (3551)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
-
ESPiN Belows_Me said...
Claiborne or trade down.
1) In today's NFL, you don't take a running back top 10 unless he is an Adrian Peterson, (which Richardson isn't). You win throwing the football. Get a quarterback and some weapons.
2) The difference between Blackmon, Floyd, Wright isn't THAT big. You can get Floyd from 7 to 15, and Wright should be available at 22.
3) Ryan Tannehill has 19 starts in college. His teams won nothing. And his second half numbers pale in comparison to the first. Christian Ponder and Blaine Gabbert are proof you don't reach for quarterbacks. The Browns need someone to come in and help IMMEDIATELY. Tannehill is a project.
Claiborne fills a need for someone opposite Haden, (Sheldon Brown is past it). Is ready to contribute now. And allows this defense to take another step towards REALLY GOOD, and still address WR, RT, and RB in this draft with all the picks (13) they have.
Morris Claiborne or trade out.
BuckeyeSteves
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5650 votes total - (3551)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
641 votes total - (836)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
duperow40 said...
PIcking 4 you have to take elite talent if it is available. Browns have lots of needs so they should take the Best Player Available. That is Trent Richardson (assuming no one trades up to 3 to grab him before Cleveland does). He is an elite talent. He can do it all and has proven to be durable in the SEC. He is the obvious pick here. He is a great talent.
If Tampa or someone does trade up to #3 to get Richardson, then it is my opinion the Browns should take Claibourne. I know they need offensive weapons, but again when drafting this high you take the elite talent. He is that. The Browns would then have 2 really good CBs to combat passing attacks and strengthen further an already strong young defense.
Tennehill and Blackmon are not elite talents. They are good talents that could be good, but I don't see potential GREATNESS in either. I see potential GREATNESS with both TRich and Claibourne.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Frozen Buckeye on 4/18/2012 at 10:06 AM
Badger Alumni, Lifelong Buckeye.
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
641 votes total - (836)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
roxannereggie
- 4 stars Rating: 74
798 votes total - (795)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
creel647977
- 5 stars Rating: 89
1198 votes total - (1009)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
creel647977
- 5 stars Rating: 89
1198 votes total - (1009)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
BuckeyeSteves
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5650 votes total - (3551)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Drummindrew03
- 5 stars Rating: 86
586 votes total - (766)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
creel647977
- 5 stars Rating: 89
1198 votes total - (1009)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
BuckeyeSteves
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5650 votes total - (3551)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BBucksorBeGone8 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
17563 votes total - CEO... Rant Thread. Rules Enforcement Czar!
- (45495)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ESPiN Belows_Me said...
Claiborne or trade down.
1) In today's NFL, you don't take a running back top 10 unless he is an Adrian Peterson, (which Richardson isn't). You win throwing the football. Get a quarterback and some weapons.
2) The difference between Blackmon, Floyd, Wright isn't THAT big. You can get Floyd from 7 to 15, and Wright should be available at 22.
3) Ryan Tannehill has 19 starts in college. His teams won nothing. And his second half numbers pale in comparison to the first. Christian Ponder and Blaine Gabbert are proof you don't reach for quarterbacks. The Browns need someone to come in and help IMMEDIATELY. Tannehill is a project.
Claiborne fills a need for someone opposite Haden, (Sheldon Brown is past it). Is ready to contribute now. And allows this defense to take another step towards REALLY GOOD, and still address WR, RT, and RB in this draft with all the picks (13) they have.
Morris Claiborne or trade out.
-
CapitalBuck
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3427 votes total - (9452)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3








Who Should and Shouldn't Browns Pick With Their No. 1 Choice?