Online Now 2300

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

On this Board 480
Record: 4078 (1/25/2013)

Online now 2674
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Can Penn State survive in the Big Ten?

  • So we know the penalties. A 4 year bowl ban. Scholarship reductions bringing the school down to a 1-AA level. Huge financial implications beyond the NCAA 60 million and Big Ten 13 million fines. Civil cases will be far more.

    But lets go deeper.

    How about gate receipts just for home games? It is likely most away team fans will avoid travelling to "Happy Valley." That includes seriously reduced away game promotions within the other Big Ten Schools. Ohio State travels to Penn State this year. How many will go? Not many. In fact, do you think the Ohio State band should play there? How about Wisconsin at the end of the year? Not many.

    Now lets talk about Penn State away games. How many Penn State fans are going to be proud enough to travel with the team? The stigma is going to stick to them for years if not decades. Imagine the Penn State band sitting in say, Iowa, getting heckled for hours. Heck, that mascot won't be able to go to away games. The whole thing is just ugly.

    Then you think about how terrible their team is going to be. It's going to be an absolute blight on the conference. Kind of like the mercy charity case you donote money to.

    ShaneGentry

  • I think they'll survive, it's just going to be a rough road.

    I'm with ya on the trip to Happy Valley this year though...Buckeye fans that decide to go need to be incredibly careful about where you venture. I'd recommend keeping a low profile, particularly after the game on the way to your car.

    Razorback

  • I don't think they can for the long run. They'll be all right for this year, and maybe next, but I think many of their fans are in deep denial about the length and severity of all this. I talked to a fan last night who really believes that no one's going to transfer, the troops are going to be rallied, and the kids of PA will still wanna go there. The truth is, none of those things will happen, and PSU will be worse than Indiana within 3 years and that will last for a decade. It will also take a very dynamic coach on the level of Urban to revitalize that program in 5 years. That's even assuming they don't get further slammed by the DOE, and lose so much revenue in the form of sponsorships and having their credit downgraded, that they can survive. I think they should consider leaving the B1G and either go independent or joining the weaker Big Least.

    This post was edited by godhatesusall on 7/26/2012 at 9:37 PM

    godhatesusall

  • Could they really be any worse than IU and Minny?

    GABuckgrad

  • godhatesusall said...

    I don't think they can for the long run. They'll be all right for this year, and maybe next, but I think many of their fans are in deep denial about the length and severity of all this. I talked to a fan last night who really believes that no one's going to transfer, the troops are going to be rallied, and the kids of PA will still wanna go there. The truth is, none of those things will happen, and PSU will be worse than Indiana within 3 years and that will last for a decade. It will also take a very dynamic coach on the level of Urban to revitalize that program in 5 years. That's even assuming they don't get further slammed by the DOE, and lose so much revenue in the form of sponsorships and having their credit downgraded, that they can survive. I think they should consider leaving the B1G and either go independent or joining the weaker Big Least.

    This is true. Our guys basically crumbled after wisky, but after a while they just wanted the season of yell over. This is worse, but they will still be better than the two schools I mentioned. It will be similar to a Dick Rodding.

    GABuckgrad

  • I say the 1st 2 years will be tough on PSU, then the talent level and the program will be horrible by year 3, and then the fans and outside fans will start rooting for PSU because they will be the underdogs.

    I think they survive, but they will survive after 4 years as being the lower to mid-tier team in the B1G. 6 years from now, the fans will start to come unravelled, and then a coaching change might be happening. This might set them back another 3 years.

    Chuman

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    olref129665

  • Chuman said...

    I say the 1st 2 years will be tough on PSU, then the talent level and the program will be horrible by year 3, and then the fans and outside fans will start rooting for PSU because they will be the underdogs.

    I think they survive, but they will survive after 4 years as being the lower to mid-tier team in the B1G. 6 years from now, the fans will start to come unravelled, and then a coaching change might be happening. This might set them back another 3 years.

    The major problem, as far as I understand, is that they are scheduled to have only 60 available scholarships in 2015?

    ShaneGentry

  • ShaneGentry said...

    The major problem, as far as I understand, is that they are scheduled to have only 60 available scholarships in 2015?

    I think they have to be down 10 for 2013 and then down 20 (capped at 65) for the following 3 years.

    Razorback

  • Razorback said...

    I think they have to be down 10 for 2013 and then down 20 (capped at 65) for the following 3 years.

    Is it 3 years, or 4 Razor? I know next year they drop 10, but I wasn't clear about how long it lasted with 20.

    godhatesusall

  • Razorback said...

    I think they have to be down 10 for 2013 and then down 20 (capped at 65) for the following 3 years.

    I've just read three different articles on it but none of them really spell it out perfectly. The cap at 65 in year 2 doesn't make sense because you'd have to drop athletes from being able to play. Is it that harsh cap wise? BUT, there is language in the NCAA statement saying that students who choose to stay at Penn State but not play will still have their education paid for. Perhaps that was foreshadowing?

    ShaneGentry

  • Razorback said...

    I think they have to be down 10 for 2013 and then down 20 (capped at 65) for the following 3 years.

    They could spread those 65 scholarships over 75-80 players by giving partial scholarships to borderline players. These are in-state players who will take a partial scholarship to Penn State rather than being a preferred walk-on at Ohio State, Michigan or Pitt. Another source of talent is the JUCO and prep schools, where every year many of them walk on to schools in their home state.

    fars1d3s

  • This is JMO, PSU will be 7-6 this year. Next four to five years is a different story. Losing ten schollies a year is HUGH. They can't afford to miss on one single recruit.

    dkbuckeyes

  • godhatesusall said...

    I don't think they can for the long run. They'll be all right for this year, and maybe next, but I think many of their fans are in deep denial about the length and severity of all this. I talked to a fan last night who really believes that no one's going to transfer, the troops are going to be rallied, and the kids of PA will still wanna go there. The truth is, none of those things will happen, and PSU will be worse than Indiana within 3 years and that will last for a decade. It will also take a very dynamic coach on the level of Urban to revitalize that program in 5 years. That's even assuming they don't get further slammed by the DOE, and lose so much revenue in the form of sponsorships and having their credit downgraded, that they can survive. I think they should consider leaving the B1G and either go independent or joining the weaker Big Least.

    I disagree. Yes, they will lose some players to transfer and the scholarship reduction will hurt. But so far, there has not been a mass exodus. This means they should be respectable the next couple years. They will be in the lower tier of the BIG - Indiana level - for years 3 and 4, but then they will start to rebuild. Within a decade, they should easily be back to bowl team level. It's not as if they been some national powerhouse lately. Losing a few more games a year is not the end of the world for them.

    I remember living in the Tampa Bay area when USF started a program from scratch. Within a decade, they made it into the top five for a week or two and are pretty respectable year in and year out.

    JAG24

  • ShaneGentry said...

    So we know the penalties. A 4 year bowl ban. Scholarship reductions bringing the school down to a 1-AA level. Huge financial implications beyond the NCAA 60 million and Big Ten 13 million fines. Civil cases will be far more.

    But lets go deeper.

    How about gate receipts just for home games? It is likely most away team fans will avoid travelling to "Happy Valley." That includes seriously reduced away game promotions within the other Big Ten Schools. Ohio State travels to Penn State this year. How many will go? Not many. In fact, do you think the Ohio State band should play there? How about Wisconsin at the end of the year? Not many.

    Now lets talk about Penn State away games. How many Penn State fans are going to be proud enough to travel with the team? The stigma is going to stick to them for years if not decades. Imagine the Penn State band sitting in say, Iowa, getting heckled for hours. Heck, that mascot won't be able to go to away games. The whole thing is just ugly.

    Then you think about how terrible their team is going to be. It's going to be an absolute blight on the conference. Kind of like the mercy charity case you donote money to.

    If Indiana, Minnesota, Purdue can survive year in and year out as perpetual conference bottom feeders then surely Penn State can.
    It'll just be an unfamiliar position for them.

    Because after all, the aforementioned three are the mere equivalent of a 1 AA program.

    sugarcrystal

  • They will still get some elite talent. PSU fans growing up and wanting to play for their dream school. Pennsylvania is a 5 star rich state and a lot of kids want to stay close to home. Diggs is a good example. They just wont be able to get an abundance of talented kids with low schollies. USC became irrelevant for a few years in the PAC-10 and you saw other teams like Oregon benefit from it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    O-H-12-0

    BuckeyeDefense

  • BuckeyeDefense said...

    They will still get some elite talent. PSU fans growing up and wanting to play for their dream school. Pennsylvania is a 5 star rich state and a lot of kids want to stay close to home. Diggs is a good example. They just wont be able to get an abundance of talented kids with low schollies. USC became irrelevant for a few years in the PAC-10 and you saw other teams like Oregon benefit from it.

    You sound like a PSU homer.

    They will NOT get elite talent from this point on. I'll be shocked if any of the top kids in this class remain commited, and it will only get much worse in years to come. It'll take at least 6 years for top recruits to begin considering them again, and that's only if they bring in a high profile guy like Urban.

    godhatesusall

  • JAG24 said...

    I disagree. Yes, they will lose some players to transfer and the scholarship reduction will hurt. But so far, there has not been a mass exodus. This means they should be respectable the next couple years. They will be in the lower tier of the BIG - Indiana level - for years 3 and 4, but then they will start to rebuild. Within a decade, they should easily be back to bowl team level. It's not as if they been some national powerhouse lately. Losing a few more games a year is not the end of the world for them.

    I remember living in the Tampa Bay area when USF started a program from scratch. Within a decade, they made it into the top five for a week or two and are pretty respectable year in and year out.

    They may be respectable this year, as the timing of the sanctions pretty much assured the current team stays intact, with the possible exception of Redd. However, next year they'll fall fast and hard, and it gets worse for the next 5 years after. They can't really take anyone in this class, and don't forget that last years class was pretty much gutted by Urban. So their talent level is already being eroded even before the sanctions start. There's no way they can compete even with Indiana given the lack of depth and talent. And with the state this team will be in come 5 years from now, why would any top players want to go there? It'll take a dynamic new coach and some time to turn them around. Besides, even if they were to get Saban to come in, and recruit the #1 class, it would take about 3 years for those guys to make them competitive with the big boys. At minimum this is an 8 year rebuild.

    godhatesusall

  • godhatesusall said...

    Is it 3 years, or 4 Razor? I know next year they drop 10, but I wasn't clear about how long it lasted with 20.

    Pretty sure it's 4 or 5. Probably 4.

    Razorback

  • ShaneGentry said...

    I've just read three different articles on it but none of them really spell it out perfectly. The cap at 65 in year 2 doesn't make sense because you'd have to drop athletes from being able to play. Is it that harsh cap wise? BUT, there is language in the NCAA statement saying that students who choose to stay at Penn State but not play will still have their education paid for. Perhaps that was foreshadowing?

    Yeah I believe basically for the next ~4 years they can only sign a maximum of 15 kids per year, and are capped at 65 scholarships max, so basically as their seniors graduate (or transfer), they can only replace so many of them. Their scholarship roster is going to start shrinking quickly over the next couple of years because they will only be allowed to add so many back in to replace them. This is where we'll start seeing their ability to compete with teams begin to diminish.

    Razorback

  • I hope they get pounded, because if they don't, the conference really sucks.

    chuck0609

  • chuck0609 said...

    I hope they get pounded, because if they don't, the conference really sucks.

    lol

    True that.

    Razorback

  • godhatesusall said...

    They may be respectable this year, as the timing of the sanctions pretty much assured the current team stays intact, with the possible exception of Redd. However, next year they'll fall fast and hard, and it gets worse for the next 5 years after. They can't really take anyone in this class, and don't forget that last years class was pretty much gutted by Urban. So their talent level is already being eroded even before the sanctions start. There's no way they can compete even with Indiana given the lack of depth and talent. And with the state this team will be in come 5 years from now, why would any top players want to go there? It'll take a dynamic new coach and some time to turn them around. Besides, even if they were to get Saban to come in, and recruit the #1 class, it would take about 3 years for those guys to make them competitive with the big boys. At minimum this is an 8 year rebuild.

    The picture you are painting is too bleak. Loss of scholarships and a post-season ban isn't going to kill them. There are still enough decent players in the State who grew up as fans who will go there and I expect that they will still draw good crowds to the stadium. I don't see them getting too many blue chippers, but 2nd or 3rd tier players who dreamed of going there and now have a chance to be starters will be lined-up at their door. Some of these guys will see this as their chance and develop into NFL-caliber players. Coachng staff is solid and an will be able to help hold things together. They need to sell guys on "opportunity" just like USF did when they started their program in the 1990's at a lower division.

    I think at their lowest point, they are still going to be at least at Indiana level. They have averaged about 9 wins per season over the last decade, and I'd look for them to average about 6 wins per season for the next decade. In 2003 and 2004 they had some under 500 seasons and were able to bounce back. Several losing seasons will not destroy them.

    They are circling the wagons and some of this attitude can be healthy. With good coaching and fan support - and an acknowledgement and acceptance that their program bears some responsibility - they can be fine. With the right attitude, maybe the NCAA will consider reducing the penalty in a few years. They are smart enough at PSU to fight back in a positive way both on an off the field and look forward with optimism.

    They are understandably still in denial right now and not ready for this line of thinking, but I certain they will get there.

    JAG24

  • JAG24 said...

    The picture you are painting is too bleak. Loss of scholarships and a post-season ban isn't going to kill them. There are still enough decent players in the State who grew up as fans who will go there and I expect that they will still draw good crowds to the stadium. I don't see them getting too many blue chippers, but 2nd or 3rd tier players who dreamed of going there and now have a chance to be starters will be lined-up at their door. Some of these guys will see this as their chance and develop into NFL-caliber players. Coachng staff is solid and an will be able to help hold things together. They need to sell guys on "opportunity" just like USF did when they started their program in the 1990's at a lower division.

    I think at their lowest point, they are still going to be at least at Indiana level. They have averaged about 9 wins per season over the last decade, and I'd look for them to average about 6 wins per season for the next decade. In 2003 and 2004 they had some under 500 seasons and were able to bounce back. Several losing seasons will not destroy them.

    They are circling the wagons and some of this attitude can be healthy. With good coaching and fan support - and an acknowledgement and acceptance that their program bears some responsibility - they can be fine. With the right attitude, maybe the NCAA will consider reducing the penalty in a few years. They are smart enough at PSU to fight back in a positive way both on an off the field and look forward with optimism.

    They are understandably still in denial right now and not ready for this line of thinking, but I certain they will get there.

    I strongly disagree that top in-staters will go there after this year. They will do well to get 5 of the top 20 in state for the next 5 years, and they'll have to settle for MAC prospects from elsewhere. I'll give O'Brien this though, he must be an excellent salesman to keep his current players together. If he's as good a coach, they'll be respectable for the first couple of years. But NO ONE can overcome such scholarship losses unless they're playing in a very weak conference. Though a cynic may say the B1G is really not that strong.

    The storm however, is not yet over. The DOE could slam them, their insurance company is going to fight with them over who's responsible for liability settlements to victims, their credit rating is facing a dowgrade, which has serious consequences to their ability to borrow money, and there's the very real chance that more dirt is going to be uncovered at the trials of Schultz and Curley, not to mention the possibility Spanier may face charges as well. You can't tell me those guys are going to bite the bullet to protect that shit-hole institution rather than ameliorate the charges against them. I expect them to sing like birds, and further harm Joe's legacy. They will be worse than Indiana in 3 years.

    godhatesusall

  • They can if they schedule the MAC for non-conference games. They should also schedule 1-AA teams such as Youngstown State, Illinois State, Maine or Northern Iowa for non-conference games. FSU have 2 Div 1-AA teams for this season.

    fars1d3s