-
IndyDog said...
What does that have to do with anything? So a crime is not a crime if it was perpetrated in years past?
And the worst thing about this is that your head coach and ruler of Happy Valley knew about this and stated that he wished he'd done more. If this isn't lack of institutional control I don't know what is.
-
All4PSU said...
My point is that the acts were committed by someone who was previously a member if the program. It would be the same as if a former player committed a similiar crime while back on campus and somehow it impacted the current program. I know the issue is "was it covered up?". Obviously there was knowledge by people in power, but did it involve football players or recruits or current coaches committing any acts of wrong doing (the actual crime in question of sexual abuse)? I know everyone is claiming LOIC and sure, this would demonstrate that the institution did not handle this situation appropriately, but the NCAA is in charge of ATHLETIC ISSUES. This is a criminal issue committed by an individual who will be tried and punish for his crimes. The university will face legal issues along with the administrators who were involved. I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes. I may be wrong and I don't know, just like no one else knows. Opinions are all that are out there and we will eventually find out what will or wil not happen.
This post was edited by Buckeye1996 on 6/15/2012 at 1:15 PM
-
All4PSU said...
My point is that the acts were committed by someone who was previously a member if the program. It would be the same as if a former player committed a similiar crime while back on campus and somehow it impacted the current program. I know the issue is "was it covered up?". Obviously there was knowledge by people in power, but did it involve football players or recruits or current coaches committing any acts of wrong doing (the actual crime in question of sexual abuse)? I know everyone is claiming LOIC and sure, this would demonstrate that the institution did not handle this situation appropriately, but the NCAA is in charge of ATHLETIC ISSUES. This is a criminal issue committed by an individual who will be tried and punish for his crimes. The university will face legal issues along with the administrators who were involved. I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes. I may be wrong and I don't know, just like no one else knows. Opinions are all that are out there and we will eventually find out what will or wil not happen.
DaytonBuckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1141 votes total - (2225)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
IndyDog said...
What does that have to do with anything? So a crime is not a crime if it was perpetrated in years past?
And the worst thing about this is that your head coach and ruler of Happy Valley knew about this and stated that he wished he'd done more. If this isn't lack of institutional control I don't know what is.
THEnutbuster
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7311 votes total - Bucknuts Moderator
- (8500)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
dcraig said...
I don't wish evil on anyone, but from the outside, this whole thing seems to be about money, football money. Football is the cash cow at places like PSU, OSU. And it looks to me like people in the athletic dept., people associated with the football program let this go on, probably hoping that what some part of them knew was true, wasn't.
That, at the root, seems an institutional issue. The football people knew about it; it happened at their facilities. Sandusky had a football parking space. (PSU, Happy Valley, seems so protected. That kind of obscene behavior might've been harder to hide in a bigger place like Columbus.)
They say money corrupts. That might be what we have here. (Most of us don't have to worry about this kind of money.)
God bless those kids and their families, the whole PSU community.
-
JAG24 said...
I agree what any of us wants doesn't matter, but I'm curious as to what you or any of the other posters think that NCAA should do or what you would like to see them do. What NCAA penalties would be just in this situation?
Whould you all be satisified with scholarship reduction, post-season ban, or are you after the death penalty?
-
THEnutbuster
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7311 votes total - Bucknuts Moderator
- (8500)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
THEnutbuster
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7311 votes total - Bucknuts Moderator
- (8500)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BIGBUCK20
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2996 votes total - Buckeye Sergeant at Arms
- (4048)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
THEnutbuster
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7311 votes total - Bucknuts Moderator
- (8500)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
THEnutbuster said...
My fees as an expert are very inexpensive , direct and to the point
Sandusky is a sick SOB.
Seriously there isn't a damn thing the defense could tell me to be considerate to Sandusky and his bullshit condition.
Sandusky knew what he was doing was wrong.
The fact that he asked some of the boys to not saying anything or bribe them shows he knew what he was doing was wrong. If he really thought what he was doing was right he would have been more public about it or brought those kids into the shower when the team was in there too, instead he was very secretive about it. SANDUSKY REALLY IS A PATHETIC TURD
-
THEnutbuster
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7311 votes total - Bucknuts Moderator
- (8500)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chad L
- 5 stars Rating: 90
7234 votes total - Boat Drinks
- (7817)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
boom*boom* said...
why jag? are you that interested in my opinion? or are you trying to prove something? I will play your game. Just like they punish other schools (no real mystery here imo)....loss of schollies, postseason ban and probation. How many schollies lost? between 1 and 85 How many seasons with no bowl? between 1 and 100 How long probation? between 3 and 100
-
JAG24 said...
Geeze, sorry to have hit a nerve. What's up with the defensiveness and accusations that I am trying to prove something or playing a game? I was interested in your opinion and the opinion of others on the topic as to where you all saw the end game of NCAA involvement.
As I stated above on a couple posts - if NCAA gets involved and follows through on Emmert's letter - I would think the only plausible outcome would be the death penalty for the PSU program. Maybe you disagree with that statement, anticipate a lesser sentence that would be to your satisfaction, or maybe you want PSU to get the death penalty.
This is the age old and simple question of what do you want. Buchtooth (and sounds like Chad) is going with the death penalty and my opinion is the NCAA should stay out of it.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6




More PSU news....