Online Now 1094

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

On this Board 136
Record: 4078 (1/25/2013)

Online now 1131
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

More PSU news....

  • IndyDog said...

    What does that have to do with anything? So a crime is not a crime if it was perpetrated in years past?

    And the worst thing about this is that your head coach and ruler of Happy Valley knew about this and stated that he wished he'd done more. If this isn't lack of institutional control I don't know what is.

    My point is that the acts were committed by someone who was previously a member if the program. It would be the same as if a former player committed a similiar crime while back on campus and somehow it impacted the current program. I know the issue is "was it covered up?". Obviously there was knowledge by people in power, but did it involve football players or recruits or current coaches committing any acts of wrong doing (the actual crime in question of sexual abuse)? I know everyone is claiming LOIC and sure, this would demonstrate that the institution did not handle this situation appropriately, but the NCAA is in charge of ATHLETIC ISSUES. This is a criminal issue committed by an individual who will be tried and punish for his crimes. The university will face legal issues along with the administrators who were involved. I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes. I may be wrong and I don't know, just like no one else knows. Opinions are all that are out there and we will eventually find out what will or wil not happen.

    All4PSU

  • All4PSU said...

    My point is that the acts were committed by someone who was previously a member if the program. It would be the same as if a former player committed a similiar crime while back on campus and somehow it impacted the current program. I know the issue is "was it covered up?". Obviously there was knowledge by people in power, but did it involve football players or recruits or current coaches committing any acts of wrong doing (the actual crime in question of sexual abuse)? I know everyone is claiming LOIC and sure, this would demonstrate that the institution did not handle this situation appropriately, but the NCAA is in charge of ATHLETIC ISSUES. This is a criminal issue committed by an individual who will be tried and punish for his crimes. The university will face legal issues along with the administrators who were involved. I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes. I may be wrong and I don't know, just like no one else knows. Opinions are all that are out there and we will eventually find out what will or wil not happen.

    "I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes."

    I feel for you All4PSU, but this statement has me totally baffled. The connection is very clear in my mind. Sandusky was a coach when earlier acts were committed. You can argue why he suddenly retired, but his acts continued and he was still very much apart of the football culture. He used his status as a football coach to get access to the kids, and your AD (ATHLETIC DIRECTOR!!!!), head coach, assistant coach and high level administrators knew about this crap and appears that they tried to sweep it under the rug to save the reputation of the football program and the university.

    So, now you have a criminal act that is deeply tied to the football program, the athletic program, and the university as a whole. The NCAA may punish the entire athletic program at PSU and not just the football program while the legal system will punish the entire university.

    This post was edited by Buckeye1996 on 6/15/2012 at 1:15 PM

    Buckeye1996

  • All4PSU said...

    My point is that the acts were committed by someone who was previously a member if the program. It would be the same as if a former player committed a similiar crime while back on campus and somehow it impacted the current program. I know the issue is "was it covered up?". Obviously there was knowledge by people in power, but did it involve football players or recruits or current coaches committing any acts of wrong doing (the actual crime in question of sexual abuse)? I know everyone is claiming LOIC and sure, this would demonstrate that the institution did not handle this situation appropriately, but the NCAA is in charge of ATHLETIC ISSUES. This is a criminal issue committed by an individual who will be tried and punish for his crimes. The university will face legal issues along with the administrators who were involved. I just do not see where the NCAA can connect the athletic program and football specifically to these crimes. I may be wrong and I don't know, just like no one else knows. Opinions are all that are out there and we will eventually find out what will or wil not happen.

    I think what you are suggesting is that the NCAA has, for lack of a proper word, "legal standing" in Institutional Control of ATHLETIC matters, but no legal standing in criminal ones. This makes some sense to me. HOWEVER, that said, the fact that the program/institution acted in an unethical manner by not reporting this activity to the police sooner and is a violation of an NCAA by-law, will give the NCAA "moral" authority to impose some type of penalties.

    As you say, time will tell.

    DaytonBuckeye

  • I don't wish evil on anyone, but from the outside, this whole thing seems to be about money, football money. Football is the cash cow at places like PSU, OSU. And it looks to me like people in the athletic dept., people associated with the football program let this go on, probably hoping that what some part of them knew was true, wasn't.

    That, at the root, seems an institutional issue. The football people knew about it; it happened at their facilities. Sandusky had a football parking space. (PSU, Happy Valley, seems so protected. That kind of obscene behavior might've been harder to hide in a bigger place like Columbus.)

    They say money corrupts. That might be what we have here. (Most of us don't have to worry about this kind of money.)

    God bless those kids and their families, the whole PSU community.

    dcraig

  • IndyDog said...

    What does that have to do with anything? So a crime is not a crime if it was perpetrated in years past?

    And the worst thing about this is that your head coach and ruler of Happy Valley knew about this and stated that he wished he'd done more. If this isn't lack of institutional control I don't know what is.

    Indy you were responding to the psu fan about not involving current coaches but one of the witnesses did mention Bradley by name. Sorry I was on my phone and to lazy to quote him

    THEnutbuster

  • boom*boom* said...

    it doesn't matter what i want them to do. they will do what they want. all i am trying to let these delusional fans know is that they are not free and clear of the ncaa like they think they are. maybe you should ask the ncaa why they are looking and what they will do, not me.

    I agree what any of us wants doesn't matter, but I'm curious as to what you or any of the other posters think that NCAA should do or what you would like to see them do. What NCAA penalties would be just in this situation?

    Whould you all be satisified with scholarship reduction, post-season ban, or are you after the death penalty?

    JAG24

  • dcraig said...

    I don't wish evil on anyone, but from the outside, this whole thing seems to be about money, football money. Football is the cash cow at places like PSU, OSU. And it looks to me like people in the athletic dept., people associated with the football program let this go on, probably hoping that what some part of them knew was true, wasn't.

    That, at the root, seems an institutional issue. The football people knew about it; it happened at their facilities. Sandusky had a football parking space. (PSU, Happy Valley, seems so protected. That kind of obscene behavior might've been harder to hide in a bigger place like Columbus.)

    They say money corrupts. That might be what we have here. (Most of us don't have to worry about this kind of money.)

    God bless those kids and their families, the whole PSU community.

    This was more about values than money in my opinion. PSU's reputation and the institution's desire to protect the program were more highly valued than doing what was right.

    JAG24

  • JAG24 said...

    I agree what any of us wants doesn't matter, but I'm curious as to what you or any of the other posters think that NCAA should do or what you would like to see them do. What NCAA penalties would be just in this situation?

    Whould you all be satisified with scholarship reduction, post-season ban, or are you after the death penalty?

    They should get the death penalty and their current players should be able to transfer without sitting out a year. If this isnt death penalty worthy, then nothing is or ever will be.

    Bucktooth2

  • JAG24 said...

    This was more about values than money in my opinion. PSU's reputation and the institution's desire to protect the program were more highly valued than doing what was right.

    Bingo, +1 jag, def agree with the last part of your comment. However there is some things coming out that look like money could have also been an issue

    THEnutbuster

  • Bucktooth2 said...

    They should get the death penalty and their current players should be able to transfer without sitting out a year. If this isnt death penalty worthy, then nothing is or ever will be.

    Can you imagine that hole getting the death penalty? They showed their true colors when Joe was fired. I can't imagine what would happen. Smh

    THEnutbuster

  • It appears that Sandusky's defense team is getting desperate. They are bringing in some expert to explain his disorder for sending love letters. Amazing.

    Buckeye1996

  • Buckeye1996 said...

    It appears that Sandusky's defense team is getting desperate. They are bringing in some expert to explain his disorder for sending love letters. Amazing.

    I just read this as well. What else should they try? It's obvious this old turd is a nut job of the first order! Just another typical defense tactic when everything else cannot be defended. The bottom line is that this guy is an A #1 pedophile! Bottom line # 2 is that most of the hierarchy @ PeeSU knew this for years and covered it up to protect the brand name and legacy of JoePa's program. The cat is now out of the bag! PeeSU is not sainted after all! "They Are Pee-S-U....and the Pee is for pervert!

    I have many friends who attended PeeSU. Most are stunned, and ashamed by this issue to say the least. I DO feel sorry for them, but remember back one year guys......KARMA IS AN ABSOLUTE BITCH! This ain't no tattoo for personal belonging issue. If the school administration IS convicted of a cover up, regardless of the educational qualities of that school, there is no defense of the tainted reputation world wide. Their fake-ass halo is gone forever. Welcome in the law suits. Again, I actually do feel sorry for them. The potential NCAA inquiries/ penalties are the least of their worries now. Hello never ending lawsuits!

    I still don't think E$PeeIN is being nearly as hard on them as they were on us over tattoos, personal belongings, and a coach who didn't fess up he was told about it and stopped it.

    GO BUCKEYES!

    This post was edited by BIGBUCK20 on 6/15/2012 at 7:44 PM

    signature image

    GO BUCKEYES

    BIGBUCK20

  • My fees as an expert are very inexpensive , direct and to the point

    Sandusky is a sick SOB.

    Seriously there isn't a damn thing the defense could tell me to be considerate to Sandusky and his bullshit condition.

    Sandusky knew what he was doing was wrong.

    The fact that he asked some of the boys to not saying anything or bribe them shows he knew what he was doing was wrong. If he really thought what he was doing was right he would have been more public about it or brought those kids into the shower when the team was in there too, instead he was very secretive about it. SANDUSKY REALLY IS A PATHETIC TURD

    THEnutbuster

  • THEnutbuster said...

    My fees as an expert are very inexpensive , direct and to the point

    Sandusky is a sick SOB.

    Seriously there isn't a damn thing the defense could tell me to be considerate to Sandusky and his bullshit condition.

    Sandusky knew what he was doing was wrong.

    The fact that he asked some of the boys to not saying anything or bribe them shows he knew what he was doing was wrong. If he really thought what he was doing was right he would have been more public about it or brought those kids into the shower when the team was in there too, instead he was very secretive about it. SANDUSKY REALLY IS A PATHETIC TURD

    What do you have against Turds? Geez!

    Bucktooth2

  • Bucktooth2 said...

    What do you have against Turds? Geez!

    I think you're right, what has a turd ever done to be brought down to the level of Sandusky?

    THEnutbuster

  • THEnutbuster said...

    Indy you were responding to the psu fan about not involving current coaches but one of the witnesses did mention Bradley by name. Sorry I was on my phone and to lazy to quote him

    Nut...the poster seems to focus on current coaches when in my mind it doesn't matter. I think a lawyer could argue since Sandusky had run of the place that he was still part of the program even though he wasn't officially employed. His access to facilities, closed practices, and preferential treatment would be enough IMO. It could also be argued that since he wasn't officially employed but had run of the joint there was definitely a LOIC. In any event, the NCAA has enough here to investigate the matter, not to mention JoePa being employed when all this went down. It's an ugly mess over there and far from over.

    IndyDog

  • Anyone who thinks that Joe Pa isn't as guilty (or more so) than anyone else had better get their head out of their a$$es and face reality. The guy was a scum bag that had all the PSU fans snowed for many many years. Although I feel bad for his family I will NOT make excuses for the person in charge of the program that disgraced and embarassed any honest PSU fans left.

    maci57

  • Bucktooth2 said...

    They should get the death penalty and their current players should be able to transfer without sitting out a year. If this isnt death penalty worthy, then nothing is or ever will be.

    I personally don't think the NCAA should get involved, but if they do this is the only reasonable answer IMO. Could you give them the same penalty as OSU or USC? WTF would that look like.

    The truly sad part is that if they had just fired Sandusky and told the police when they first found out, it would have been a smear for a few months and then nobody would even think about it. Instead, this will stain the program for generations.

    highlandbuck

  • whether sandusky was a current coach or not does not matter. the AD and Pres were current and they are the ones that covered it up. i feel joepa did too, but that will never come out now......unless there are emails stating otherwise.

    boomboom

  • boom*boom* said...

    whether sandusky was a current coach or not does not matter. the AD and Pres were current and they are the ones that covered it up. i feel joepa did too, but that will never come out now......unless there are emails stating otherwise.

    boom: Why won't you answer the question of what you believe the fair penalty by the NCAA should be?

    JAG24

  • JAG24 said...

    boom: Why won't you answer the question of what you believe the fair penalty by the NCAA should be?

    Not boom, but, Firing Squad.

    signature image signature image signature image

    “Look down at me and you see a fool; look up at me and you see a god; look straight at me and you see yourself” Sig pics by jrgdds.

    Chad L

  • JAG24 said...

    boom: Why won't you answer the question of what you believe the fair penalty by the NCAA should be?

    why jag? are you that interested in my opinion? or are you trying to prove something? I will play your game. Just like they punish other schools (no real mystery here imo)....loss of schollies, postseason ban and probation. How many schollies lost? between 1 and 85 How many seasons with no bowl? between 1 and 100 How long probation? between 3 and 100

    boomboom

  • boom*boom* said...

    why jag? are you that interested in my opinion? or are you trying to prove something? I will play your game. Just like they punish other schools (no real mystery here imo)....loss of schollies, postseason ban and probation. How many schollies lost? between 1 and 85 How many seasons with no bowl? between 1 and 100 How long probation? between 3 and 100

    Geeze, sorry to have hit a nerve. What's up with the defensiveness and accusations that I am trying to prove something or playing a game? I was interested in your opinion and the opinion of others on the topic as to where you all saw the end game of NCAA involvement.

    As I stated above on a couple posts - if NCAA gets involved and follows through on Emmert's letter - I would think the only plausible outcome would be the death penalty for the PSU program. Maybe you disagree with that statement, anticipate a lesser sentence that would be to your satisfaction, or maybe you want PSU to get the death penalty.

    This is the age old and simple question of what do you want. Buchtooth (and sounds like Chad) is going with the death penalty and my opinion is the NCAA should stay out of it.

    JAG24

  • JAG24 said...

    Geeze, sorry to have hit a nerve. What's up with the defensiveness and accusations that I am trying to prove something or playing a game? I was interested in your opinion and the opinion of others on the topic as to where you all saw the end game of NCAA involvement.

    As I stated above on a couple posts - if NCAA gets involved and follows through on Emmert's letter - I would think the only plausible outcome would be the death penalty for the PSU program. Maybe you disagree with that statement, anticipate a lesser sentence that would be to your satisfaction, or maybe you want PSU to get the death penalty.

    This is the age old and simple question of what do you want. Buchtooth (and sounds like Chad) is going with the death penalty and my opinion is the NCAA should stay out of it.

    Fair enough....I guess I took the tone of all your comments and questions as thinking that I wanted PSU wiped off the face of the earth. I assumed that's what you thought I would say. My bad.

    I just don't think the NCAA ever wants to give the death penalty again. If that were an option, then I don't see it getting any worse than this.....I mean the AD and Pres covering stuff up to protect the money making machine--it doesn't get any worse. It's what had me scared to death during the tressel crap. Add to that what PSU was covering up, and it just doesn't get any worse.

    So let's talk about the "death penalty". All that means is no competition in that sport for at least one year. It can be argued that taking 10 schollies away for 4 years (or whatever) and a 4 year bowl ban is worse than 1 season of no football. Now, 2 or 3 years of no football? That would be worse than a few year bowl ban imo.

    boomboom

  • Gentlemen,
    Not to start an entirely new arguement but what I would like to see the NCAA do is--
    Instead of taking scholarships away--they have to supply a non-atheletic scholarship to an under-priveledged youth for the number of crimes--Sandusky is charged with 52 crimes so let's make them do this for 5 years. That would mean 260 kids would get educations.....and by scholarships I mean everything a football player gets--tutors, food, books and room plus the pell grant monies.

    Boom, not saying you are wrong but just trying to do something good for the type of person violated. However with that stated, I would prefer to see anyone who breaks NCAA rules that the punishment change from loosing scholarships to changing the focus and giving more scholarships but they would have to be strictly acedemic. Instead of saving 80,000 per year per scholarship, a school would have to spend that money and get no benefit to their program.

    PSLBUCK