Online Now 2498

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

On this Board 303
Record: 4078 (1/25/2013)

Online now 2612
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Ohio State Offense To Run Near Oregon Speed?

  • SEC1 said...

    The 07 Gator team that lost to Michigan lost 9 of their 11 starters on defense from the 06 team. Michigan was one of 4 teams to beat UF that year. If Ginn had not went down you would have beat Florida? Ok,-then I will say if you had played Bama and LSU that year,-you would have lost to them too.

    Not exactly looking to start or continue a SEC vs. BIG10 arguement. But outside of a off day for us against Illinois and a tough rivalry game with Michigan. We owned the entire '06 season. It is my opinion that with our offense whole and offensive scheme intact, that yes, we would have beaten Florida, LSU or Alabama. And that is with no disrespect intended.

    absolutbuckeye

  • jpfbuck said...

    The statement saying "it showed us that this offense can beaten", can be said of any offense, and can especially be said of Tressel's offenses, (USC twice UF, among others),

    I mean we may have held Oregon in check and done a good job against them, but it is not like they played like our O did against UF or either USC game. I mean they ran for more than double our total offensive yards that we had against UF, (179 to 82),

    we had only 207 total yards vs USC in 2008, they had 279 against us. and we had only 265 vs USC in 2009, so Tressel's O could be just as easily stopped.

    and off day, right designed and well executed scheme, sure anyone can be stopped in an individual game, especially when you have a month to prep for it.

    But week in week out, added to our much more stout D than what the Ducks have, I will take my chances with Urban's offense over Tressel's any day.

    Dude whatever with this post.

    More idiotic and baseless criticism of Coach Tressel when all he was able to do was....

    1) Win the B10 repetitively;
    2) >.700 winning percentage
    3) 2002 National Title
    4) 9-1 against scUM
    5) Heisman Trophy Winner

    So now you don't have a point do you? shrug

    Its clear that you don't know what the frack you are talking about do you?

    All you can do is point to one or two games where the team didn't perform when anyone that knows anything
    about football knows that there are break downs from time to time. Yea I know you never have had a bad day
    at work or a bad game because you are super. Right?

    You are missing the forest for the trees and its a shame. Ridiculous post!
    -1

    no

    attachment
    attachment

    East Coast Player Known for Knocking Fools Out One At A Time!

    BuckNasty_MD

  • absolutbuckeye said...

    Really? Bro, were you asleep for the entire '06 season and happen to wake up just before the NC game? I assure you that there was nothing absurd about the importance of Ginn to our offensive scheme. I appreciate your opinion, just not understanding where its coming from.

    No, I went to Every game that year, but we had 50+ days off, Troy smith gained weight, our oline couldn't block anyone, and having one receiver wouldn't have won us that game. They outplayed us in every facet of the game. To think we would have won that game makes you an unreasonable homer who can't put things in perspective. I agree that ginn would have helped, but to think we would have won is ludacris, IMO.

    It was a memorable season, the scUM game was one of my proudest moments as a buckeye student, but that season ended so horribly. URBAN out coached tressel that game and leading up to the game, and that cannot be argued.

    This post was edited by RyGuy35 on 4/20/2012 at 10:26 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    RyGuy35

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now
    signature image signature image signature image

    SWIPE

  • RyGuy35 said...

    No, I went to Every game that year, but we had 50+ days off, Troy smith gained weight, our oline couldn't block anyone, and having one receiver wouldn't have won us that game. They outplayed us in every facet of the game. To think we would have won that game makes you an unreasonable homer who can't put things in perspective. I agree that ginn would have helped, but to think we would have won is ludacris, IMO.

    It was a memorable season, the scUM game was one of my proudest moments as a buckeye student, but that season ended so horribly. URBAN out coached tressel that game and leading up to the game, and that cannot be argued.

    Bro, I am trying to like you...really, I am...but you are making it very difficult. Since you are a Buckeye fan, I am going to let a few things slide, the unreasonable homer comment, saying that I cant put things into perspective, and saying that I am ludacris. With you stating that you went to every game, I am guessing it is because you are in the band. Which explains why your football knowledge is slightly askew. I agree with your one point...I do not like to say that "one" player would have won us the game. But when that one player has the ability to run off half a defense, or at the least occupy 2-3 defensive players, even if Ginn never got the ball thrown to him. He opened up the rest of the team!! And the O-line doesnt need to block for a 7-10 yrd pass to Gonzo, which was our bread-n-butter for the whole season. I can also concede that Tress was not able to make the coaching adjustments needed to stop Florida after Urban started bringing the house every down. But as to your belief that we had no chance with Ginn in the game....we will just agree to disagree.

    absolutbuckeye

  • absolutbuckeye said...

    Bro, I am trying to like you...really, I am...but you are making it very difficult. Since you are a Buckeye fan, I am going to let a few things slide, the unreasonable homer comment, saying that I cant put things into perspective, and saying that I am ludacris. With you stating that you went to every game, I am guessing it is because you are in the band. Which explains why your football knowledge is slightly askew. I agree with your one point...I do not like to say that "one" player would have won us the game. But when that one player has the ability to run off half a defense, or at the least occupy 2-3 defensive players, even if Ginn never got the ball thrown to him. He opened up the rest of the team!! And the O-line doesnt need to block for a 7-10 yrd pass to Gonzo, which was our bread-n-butter for the whole season. I can also concede that Tress was not able to make the coaching adjustments needed to stop Florida after Urban started bringing the house every down. But as to your belief that we had no chance with Ginn in the game....we will just agree to disagree.

    Let me restate that, I went to every home game, not every game, and no, I wasn't in the band. And if you knew anything about the band, the band doesn't travel to most of the away games.

    I know that ginn was a big time player, but you aren't going to change my mind or most peoples mind that even with ginn, we weren't going to win that game.

    Welcome to Bucknuts, at this pace u will have plenty of downvotes.

    signature image signature image signature image

    RyGuy35

  • Agree with RyGuy, we wouldn't have beaten UF in the NC game if Jesus Christ himself was our WR. In all seriousness, to think that Ted Ginn would have made up the difference for the amount of points they beat us by is nucking futs. Take off your s&g glasses absolutbuckeye.

    bucksandsurfing

  • absolutbuckeye said...

    But to be perfectly honest, if Ginn would not have gotten injured after the kick return for a touchdown. We would have crushed Florida that day!!!

    Look at my avatar, it's a picture of you 20 minutes before you made the above statement.

    IndyDog

  • argue catfight peace

    Guys, guys, guys.
    we are getting no where. Tedd ginn would have made a difference, but not a 30 point difference. Thats a 5 possesion game. Meyer seen that we could not stop the blitz and utilized it. The players were not ready. Leading to that game they were errogant, careless, partied the night before the game and Florida was not scared. Also Meyer felt that Ginn did not have to be double covered. He knew a nice zone would have done it. That whole secondary was almost as fast as Ginn that day, but you wouldnt be able to tell because we couldn't get the ball in the air past the line of scrimmage. Please guys lets keep it civil

    You both have a legitimate arguement.

    Those who leave, will be champions. - Justin Boren

    COODanke

  • bucksandsurfing said...

    Agree with RyGuy, we wouldn't have beaten UF in the NC game if Jesus Christ himself was our WR. In all seriousness, to think that Ted Ginn would have made up the difference for the amount of points they beat us by is nucking futs. Take off your s&g glasses absolutbuckeye.

    If Jesus was our receiver...........??? Yes we would have!!!

    Those who leave, will be champions. - Justin Boren

    COODanke

  • I'm starting to think the Oregon speed is from "weed."

    buckeyelouey

  • I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.

    Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..

    Ven

  • Ven said...

    I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.

    Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..

    Meyer and team made a mockery of the Buckeyes on all levels. Little Teddy Ginn would have been a non factor. Not much TS can do when he's running for his life. Anyway, Urban had an answer for Ginn too, he's not the first quick receiver they'd ever seen.

    IndyDog

  • Ven said...

    I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.

    Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..

    Yup, yup...couldnt agree with you more Ven. Nice post. Glad someone else seen the potential big picture! Sure, it didnt happen and we got our asses kicked. But WOW....what if...

    absolutbuckeye

  • You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.

    I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.

    Chuman

  • Chuman said...

    You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.

    I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.

    As a Gator fan,-I had a sinking feeling after that dominating drive fueled by the run. The score was cut to 21-14 at that point. I was shocked when OSU abandoned the run thereafter. I think you hit the nail on the head. For that game to be competitive,-the trenches and abandoning the run game were even more important than the loss of Ginn...

    SEC1

  • Chuman said...

    You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.

    I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.

    Definatly a contributing factor. However its my belief that if you want to point to the biggest reason why we lost.....handing them the ball with a short field all game long in a national title game isn't going to help you any. We even gave them the ball inside the redzone. They weren't blowing up OSU's offensive line untill it became appearent through the score that the running game (which worked really well) wasn't going to be a factor anymore.

    Take a look at the play by play. Can't give a good team the short field and expect to win. Florida had a lot of OSU help in winning that game.

    "The only thing That Team Up North will be tasting this year is the salty tears of defeat" - UFM

    Gobucks187TTUN

  • SEC1 said...

    As a Gator fan,-I had a sinking feeling after that dominating drive fueled by the run. The score was cut to 21-14 at that point. I was shocked when OSU abandoned the run thereafter. I think you hit the nail on the head. For that game to be competitive,-the trenches and abandoning the run game were even more important than the loss of Ginn...

    You hit the nail on the head. Right after that drive down field you speak of.....what does OSU come out and do next series? Abandon the run and pass the ball. WTF?

    Either way we lost and they won. Florida was the better team that day.

    The thing that bothers me most about that game isn't that we lost. Its that the team was so much better than the final score indicated. Draft day showed that. That final score was a mockery to the season they had and the talent that was on the roster.

    "The only thing That Team Up North will be tasting this year is the salty tears of defeat" - UFM

    Gobucks187TTUN

  • Gobucks187TTUN said...

    The thing that bothers me most about that game isn't that we lost. Its that the team was so much better than the final score indicated. Draft day showed that. That final score was a mockery to the season they had and the talent that was on the roster.

    Absolutely. +1

    Razorback

  • RyGuy35 said...

    No, I went to Every game that year, but we had 50+ days off, Troy smith gained weight, our oline couldn't block anyone, and having one receiver wouldn't have won us that game. They outplayed us in every facet of the game. To think we would have won that game makes you an unreasonable homer who can't put things in perspective. I agree that ginn would have helped, but to think we would have won is ludacris, IMO.

    It was a memorable season, the scUM game was one of my proudest moments as a buckeye student, but that season ended so horribly. URBAN out coached tressel that game and leading up to the game, and that cannot be argued.

    I would bet the house that if we had played Florida the very next Saturday after 'The Game' we would have beaten Florida. Just a hunch....

    No Heisman awarded yet.

    No time to get lazy and fat.

    Still primed to play this game the way it is meant to be played. With rhythm and momentum. None of which you get nor maintain after 50 some days of being lazy and having your head filled with the notion that you are the greatest team that no one has a chance of beating.

    Still primed to play this game when you are in the peak shape of your life, focused on practice and school work, not worried about winning awards or fu_king other players girlfriends, getting high and drinking yourself into oblivion.

    Troy Smith was asked some very relevant questions at some press conferences about the up-coming game and do you know what his comments were about? In-and-Out burger! Seriously!! That's no joke. That was all he seemed to be able to talk about or focus on and guess what? He sure as hell played like it.

    So did the rest of the team.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bearbuck

  • absolutbuckeye said...

    Bro, I am trying to like you...really, I am...but you are making it very difficult. Since you are a Buckeye fan, I am going to let a few things slide, the unreasonable homer comment, saying that I cant put things into perspective, and saying that I am ludacris. With you stating that you went to every game, I am guessing it is because you are in the band. Which explains why your football knowledge is slightly askew. I agree with your one point...I do not like to say that "one" player would have won us the game. But when that one player has the ability to run off half a defense, or at the least occupy 2-3 defensive players, even if Ginn never got the ball thrown to him. He opened up the rest of the team!! And the O-line doesnt need to block for a 7-10 yrd pass to Gonzo, which was our bread-n-butter for the whole season. I can also concede that Tress was not able to make the coaching adjustments needed to stop Florida after Urban started bringing the house every down. But as to your belief that we had no chance with Ginn in the game....we will just agree to disagree.

    It wouldn't have mattered who was coaching the Buckeyes that game...after the way our guys spent the 50 days leading up to it.....

    Saban, Miles, Chizik or even Meyer couldn't have done anything to stop the bleeding!

    This team had the notion in their heads that they were un-beatable.....it was droned into them immediately following 'The Game' and they didn't prepare to the best they could.

    Sure Tress has some heat to catch for this as well.....his team clearly wasn't prepared to play at all! That has to fall on coaching. But your players have to be open to listen to what you are trying to teach them....and willing to put the work and effort into practice.

    Now...not to discredit that Florida team. Let's say this game was played exactly a week after the scUM game was played. IMO I think we win the game....but it sure as hell would have been a damn good game. And also a game that Florida could very easily win as well. I think it would be a game of the ages and one I would have much rather seen.

    Timing is everything.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bearbuck

  • Ven said...

    I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.

    Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..

    I disagree with you guys that Ginn playing means we win the game. Yes, Ginn is a big difference maker. But he's not going to be the sole reason we win or lose a game. What good is Ginn going to be if Troy Smith isn't in good enough shape to get him the ball?

    Troy Smith wasn't throwing footballs while he was out in Arizona...he was doing curls with In-and-Out burgers!

    A single player does not win the game. A team wins a game.

    A team prepared to play football like the team we saw play scUM the very last game of the regular season.....that team will win the game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bearbuck

  • IndyDog said...

    Meyer and team made a mockery of the Buckeyes on all levels. Little Teddy Ginn would have been a non factor. Not much TS can do when he's running for his life. Anyway, Urban had an answer for Ginn too, he's not the first quick receiver they'd ever seen.

    I'm sorry Indy I have to disagree.

    Meyer didn't make a mockery of the Buckeyes on all levels.

    Our Buckeyes made a mockery of themselves on all levels!

    I've watched that game a painful many times.....and truthfully just less than a hand full of players actually showed up and wanted to play football.

    2 of them were Pittman and Laurenitis. Not going to have much of a chance with a fat, out of shape offensive-line, a fat and out of shape QB.....and a team caught like a deer in headlights because they didn't take a very very good and under-rated Florida football team who was for real seriously!

    Or apparently and more importantly....coaches who didn't take Florida very seriously. Talk about deers caught in headlights! Geesh!

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bearbuck

  • Chuman said...

    You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.

    I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.

    Great observation.

    I'd argue that we'd have to have prepared like we had prepared for our opponents all season...which we clearly didn't. That has to fall on coaching.

    We needed to play our brand of football. You know Beanie hardly got any reps that game. Very few. Assuming we were prepared to play this game like we had been all season and with a healthy Ginn the game would have been a much better game to watch and maybe a game that would be a hell of a lot less bitter in our minds had we still lost a close one. Which is still probably the most realistic outcome even though we'd all love to think differently.

    I think we could have won. But let's be honest here and at least give credit where credit is due. That Florida team was for real and kicked the $hit out of us. Even if we had fielded a team like we knew we had all season...that Florida team would still have been a tough one to beat!

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bearbuck

  • Bearbuck said...

    I'm sorry Indy I have to disagree.

    Meyer didn't make a mockery of the Buckeyes on all levels.

    Our Buckeyes made a mockery of themselves on all levels!

    I've watched that game a painful many times.....and truthfully just less than a hand full of players actually showed up and wanted to play football.

    2 of them were Pittman and Laurenitis. Not going to have much of a chance with a fat, out of shape offensive-line, a fat and out of shape QB.....and a team caught like a deer in headlights because they didn't take a very very good and under-rated Florida football team who was for real seriously!

    Or apparently and more importantly....coaches who didn't take Florida very seriously. Talk about deers caught in headlights! Geesh!

    Meyer had his team ready, Tress didn't...mockery...41/14 pathetic, that's a plain old fashioned ass whupping. I've read years of Ginn, in-out burger, 50 days, and other BS. All crap and buckeye fan denial as far as I'm concerned, we got owned, they blew our doors off and they'd do it again.

    IndyDog