-
SEC1 said...
The 07 Gator team that lost to Michigan lost 9 of their 11 starters on defense from the 06 team. Michigan was one of 4 teams to beat UF that year. If Ginn had not went down you would have beat Florida? Ok,-then I will say if you had played Bama and LSU that year,-you would have lost to them too.
absolutbuckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 88
72 votes total - (104)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jpfbuck said...
The statement saying "it showed us that this offense can beaten", can be said of any offense, and can especially be said of Tressel's offenses, (USC twice UF, among others),
I mean we may have held Oregon in check and done a good job against them, but it is not like they played like our O did against UF or either USC game. I mean they ran for more than double our total offensive yards that we had against UF, (179 to 82),
we had only 207 total yards vs USC in 2008, they had 279 against us. and we had only 265 vs USC in 2009, so Tressel's O could be just as easily stopped.
and off day, right designed and well executed scheme, sure anyone can be stopped in an individual game, especially when you have a month to prep for it.
But week in week out, added to our much more stout D than what the Ducks have, I will take my chances with Urban's offense over Tressel's any day.
East Coast Player Known for Knocking Fools Out One At A Time!
BuckNasty_MD ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
4780 votes total - Big Dad
- (3316)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
absolutbuckeye said...
Really? Bro, were you asleep for the entire '06 season and happen to wake up just before the NC game? I assure you that there was nothing absurd about the importance of Ginn to our offensive scheme. I appreciate your opinion, just not understanding where its coming from.
This post was edited by RyGuy35 on 4/20/2012 at 10:26 AM
RyGuy35 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 86
807 votes total - Ryan
- (519)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RyGuy35 said...
No, I went to Every game that year, but we had 50+ days off, Troy smith gained weight, our oline couldn't block anyone, and having one receiver wouldn't have won us that game. They outplayed us in every facet of the game. To think we would have won that game makes you an unreasonable homer who can't put things in perspective. I agree that ginn would have helped, but to think we would have won is ludacris, IMO.
It was a memorable season, the scUM game was one of my proudest moments as a buckeye student, but that season ended so horribly. URBAN out coached tressel that game and leading up to the game, and that cannot be argued.
absolutbuckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 88
72 votes total - (104)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
absolutbuckeye said...
Bro, I am trying to like you...really, I am...but you are making it very difficult. Since you are a Buckeye fan, I am going to let a few things slide, the unreasonable homer comment, saying that I cant put things into perspective, and saying that I am ludacris. With you stating that you went to every game, I am guessing it is because you are in the band. Which explains why your football knowledge is slightly askew. I agree with your one point...I do not like to say that "one" player would have won us the game. But when that one player has the ability to run off half a defense, or at the least occupy 2-3 defensive players, even if Ginn never got the ball thrown to him. He opened up the rest of the team!! And the O-line doesnt need to block for a 7-10 yrd pass to Gonzo, which was our bread-n-butter for the whole season. I can also concede that Tress was not able to make the coaching adjustments needed to stop Florida after Urban started bringing the house every down. But as to your belief that we had no chance with Ginn in the game....we will just agree to disagree.
RyGuy35 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 86
807 votes total - Ryan
- (519)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bucksandsurfing
- 4 stars Rating: 71
922 votes total - (852)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
bucksandsurfing said...
Agree with RyGuy, we wouldn't have beaten UF in the NC game if Jesus Christ himself was our WR. In all seriousness, to think that Ted Ginn would have made up the difference for the amount of points they beat us by is nucking futs. Take off your s&g glasses absolutbuckeye.
Those who leave, will be champions. - Justin Boren
-
buckeyelouey
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1681 votes total - (2356)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Ven said...
I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.
Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..
-
Ven said...
I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.
Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..
absolutbuckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 88
72 votes total - (104)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chuman said...
You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.
I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.
-
Chuman said...
You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.
I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.
"The only thing That Team Up North will be tasting this year is the salty tears of defeat" - UFM
Gobucks187TTUN ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
3932 votes total - (3485)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SEC1 said...
As a Gator fan,-I had a sinking feeling after that dominating drive fueled by the run. The score was cut to 21-14 at that point. I was shocked when OSU abandoned the run thereafter. I think you hit the nail on the head. For that game to be competitive,-the trenches and abandoning the run game were even more important than the loss of Ginn...
"The only thing That Team Up North will be tasting this year is the salty tears of defeat" - UFM
Gobucks187TTUN ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
3932 votes total - (3485)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
RyGuy35 said...
No, I went to Every game that year, but we had 50+ days off, Troy smith gained weight, our oline couldn't block anyone, and having one receiver wouldn't have won us that game. They outplayed us in every facet of the game. To think we would have won that game makes you an unreasonable homer who can't put things in perspective. I agree that ginn would have helped, but to think we would have won is ludacris, IMO.
It was a memorable season, the scUM game was one of my proudest moments as a buckeye student, but that season ended so horribly. URBAN out coached tressel that game and leading up to the game, and that cannot be argued.
-
absolutbuckeye said...
Bro, I am trying to like you...really, I am...but you are making it very difficult. Since you are a Buckeye fan, I am going to let a few things slide, the unreasonable homer comment, saying that I cant put things into perspective, and saying that I am ludacris. With you stating that you went to every game, I am guessing it is because you are in the band. Which explains why your football knowledge is slightly askew. I agree with your one point...I do not like to say that "one" player would have won us the game. But when that one player has the ability to run off half a defense, or at the least occupy 2-3 defensive players, even if Ginn never got the ball thrown to him. He opened up the rest of the team!! And the O-line doesnt need to block for a 7-10 yrd pass to Gonzo, which was our bread-n-butter for the whole season. I can also concede that Tress was not able to make the coaching adjustments needed to stop Florida after Urban started bringing the house every down. But as to your belief that we had no chance with Ginn in the game....we will just agree to disagree.
-
Ven said...
I do believe Ginn being on the field would have made a huge difference. Ginn WOULD have been double covered. Single coverage on him? All it would take is one burn from Ginn for 40+ yards and FL would've adjusted to double coverage. Ginn also took pressure off the the rest of receivers, leaving Gonzo and company to short quick passes, which is what you do to negate the blitzes. This in turn would've opened up the run game, les you forget we had Beanie AND Pittman.
Now with all that being said, I don't know if we win that game with Gin but it would've been a much much different game. Had we played like we did during the regular season and not gotten fat headed, OSU could've beaten ANYONE that year without a doubt..
-
Chuman said...
You guys talk about Ginn spreading the field, but the game was won in the trenches. Their D-line desroyed us. Troy couldn't get the ball out to Ginn (if he was playing) so it wouldn't matter. In order for a WR with speed to stretch the field the Oline has to provide time for him to get down the field. This was not the case. Like Indy said Troy was running for his life the whole game.
I really think the biggest change in the game was coaching. We were dominating the run game the 1st qrt. Then by half JT took the running game out of the gameplan- WHY????? I know we were down pts, but you still have to lean to your power, and that was our running game. Plus losing Ginn early - you think JT would rely on the running game more- but he didn't.
-
Bearbuck said...
I'm sorry Indy I have to disagree.
Meyer didn't make a mockery of the Buckeyes on all levels.
Our Buckeyes made a mockery of themselves on all levels!
I've watched that game a painful many times.....and truthfully just less than a hand full of players actually showed up and wanted to play football.
2 of them were Pittman and Laurenitis. Not going to have much of a chance with a fat, out of shape offensive-line, a fat and out of shape QB.....and a team caught like a deer in headlights because they didn't take a very very good and under-rated Florida football team who was for real seriously!
Or apparently and more importantly....coaches who didn't take Florida very seriously. Talk about deers caught in headlights! Geesh!
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3










Ohio State Offense To Run Near Oregon Speed?