Online Now 1921

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

On this Board 231
Record: 4078 (1/25/2013)

Online now 2082
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

SCUM recruiting strategy

  • ALeasWerNotOhio said...

    I don't care about ur sanctions. I count 2010 as a loss. That's what I was saying. I didn't think he was being a jerk by posting numbers.

    It really wasn't the #s I was talking about

    JJP

  • ALeasWerNotOhio said...

    If u want to fire off at someone who's firing at u feel free. Don't run ur mouth to me like I'm starting problems. I come to this board to check out what recruits u guys might b after. I'm interested in what osu is up to. Why is that a problem? People from this board chat on ours all the time. Some nice others just to downplay UM. Why not just ignore the idiots then. Wouldn't that be easier instead of adding fuel to the fire.

    Your name alone starts a problem with me so I'll run my mouth at you whenever I feel like it ! Maybe I didn't explain myself well enough..... a while ago, some of your blue brothers came to our board and started some crap. Well, I did fight fire, with fire. The problem was that your mods banned me after 3 posts because you scUM like to dish it out but can't take it when it comes back at you. To top it off they changed the wording of my posts to be cute. So guess what, any scUM lover I see on this board is a target !

    You know what would be even easier than ignoring the idiots, you idiots staying on your own board !

    Formerly "Buckeye47Fan". Couldn't carry over my handle, why 247 ?

    Cable_Guy

  • JJP said...

    It really wasn't the #s I was talking about

    If he did something else then I guess I understand. These boards r a great source of info. It just takes away when we have people argue about the same stupid stuff. We will both have great classes. UM is still a couple years away in my opinion. OSU is up in the air to me. New system that could take hold quick or a couple years. U never know but both teams will be there soon.

    ALeasWerNotOhio

  • A19 said...

    past 9 years Michigan 2002 Lloyd Carr 10-3-0 2003 Lloyd Carr 10-3-0 2004 Lloyd Carr 9-3-0 2005 Lloyd Carr 7-5-0 2006 Lloyd Carr 11-2-0 2007 Lloyd Carr 9-4-0 2008 Rich Rodriguez 3-9-0 2009 Rich Rodriguez 5-7-0 2010 Rich Rodriguez 7-6-0 2011 Brady Hoke 11-2

    Ohio St past 9 years 2011 6-7 2010 0-1 2009 11-2 2008 10-3 2007 11-2 2006 12-1 2005 10-2 2004 8-4 2003 11-2 OSU 79 wins Mich 73 wins (worst 9 year stretch for Michigan) closer than you guys thought i bet ,OSU is 7-2 vs Michigan but 4 games were decided by 6 pts or less (so 1 play from being 6-3 Michigan ) know idea why people think OSU has been so much better than Michigan (because of 2 Rich Rod years) past 15 years Michigan has 7 more wins than OSU

    You can play the snotty kids game about 2010 if you want. The game (s) happened, and you guys got your face caved in. We all saw it! If you noticed, perhaps OSU's "official" 2010 NCAA record may say 0-1, scUM's still says 7-6. So that loss is STILL on scUM's record as well as the other 11 victims from 2010. Vacating wins is NOT a forfeit. It just means OSU had to take those victories off their books. The victories weren't given to the losers of those games and still counts against them. If I'm not mistaken, all the game stats still count as well. Vacating is really a pointless, ridiculous, impotent penalty. It does absolutely nothing more than to give childish jackass foes a chance to say "Na Na Naa-Naaa Naa!"

    * Funny you counted games back to 2002 for scUM but only back to 2003 for OSU. There are 14 more victories (and an NC) you are missing for OSU if you ARE going back that far.

    I do absolutely agree with you that many of the games were close and could have gone either way. Damn man, if not for one BAD first qtr in 2003, and Jim Tressel is 10-0 vs scUM and possibly wins back to back NCs. So were a lot of the games in the 90s where a play or 2 would have given OSU victories. Even in 97, when Stanley Jackson singlehandedly gave you guys your only 1/2 (major nationally recognized) NC since 1948 on a silver platter by throwing one of the worst pic 6s' I've ever seen, and getting baited into a pick in the end zone, costing OSU a TD. That is a 14 point swing in that game and scUM loses and doesn't get to beat (lol) Ryan Leif. scUM's offense had ONE solid drive the entire game vs us in 97..... ONE! Hell, for that matter, if we want to look at it that way, John Cooper could, or SHOULD have been anywhere between 7-6 to 10-3 vs you guys instead of 2-10-1. But he wasn't. Even in years like 93,95,96, his teams gagged to vastly inferior scUM teams. Had Cooper just held his own, he would probably be retiring about now with between 2-4 NC under his belt, being considered the greatest OSU coach in history. There never would have been a time for Jim Tressel. Well, just remember..."If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts we'd be able to make granola!"

    GO BUCKEYES!!!

    signature image

    GO BUCKEYES

    BIGBUCK20

  • BIGBUCK20 said...

    You can play the snotty kids game about 2010 if you want. The game (s) happened, and you guys got your face caved in. We all saw it! If you noticed, perhaps OSU's "official" 2010 NCAA record may say 0-1, scUM's still says 7-6. So that loss is STILL on scUM's record as well as the other 11 victims from 2010. Vacating wins is NOT a forfeit. It just means OSU had to take those victories off their books. The victories weren't given to the losers of those games and still counts against them. If I'm not mistaken, all the game stats still count as well. Vacating is really a pointless, ridiculous, impotent penalty. It does absolutely nothing more than to give childish jackass foes a chance to say "Na Na Naa-Naaa Naa!"

    * Funny you counted games back to 2002 for scUM but only back to 2003 for OSU. There are 14 more victories (and an NC) you are missing for OSU if you ARE going back that far.

    I do absolutely agree with you that many of the games were close and could have gone either way. Damn man, if not for one BAD first qtr in 2003, and Jim Tressel is 10-0 vs scUM and possibly wins back to back NCs. So were a lot of the games in the 90s where a play or 2 would have given OSU victories. Even in 97, when Stanley Jackson singlehandedly gave you guys your only 1/2 (major nationally recognized) NC since 1948 on a silver platter by throwing one of the worst pic 6s' I've ever seen, and getting baited into a pick in the end zone, costing OSU a TD. That is a 14 point swing in that game and scUM loses and doesn't get to beat (lol) Ryan Leif. scUM's offense had ONE solid drive the entire game vs us in 97..... ONE! Hell, for that matter, if we want to look at it that way, John Cooper could, or SHOULD have been anywhere between 7-6 to 10-3 vs you guys instead of 2-10-1. But he wasn't. Even in years like 93,95,96, his teams gagged to vastly inferior scUM teams. Had Cooper just held his own, he would probably be retiring about now with between 2-4 NC under his belt, being considered the greatest OSU coach in history. There never would have been a time for Jim Tressel. Well, just remember..."If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts we'd be able to make granola!"

    GO BUCKEYES!!!

    I wish that I had some votes left over because you'd definitely get a +1 from me. I'll try to remember to come back tomorrow. Good post

    Formerly "Buckeye47Fan". Couldn't carry over my handle, why 247 ?

    Cable_Guy

  • A19 said...

    Hoke has 1 year at a BCS school 11-2 a Sugar Bowl win .Michigan was the 1st team in NCAA history to beat 9 teams with 6+ wins and play 12 teams with 6+ wins in one year .,when he coached at SD State and others . he had way less talent on the field ,and still found ways to win games ,that the sign of a good coach.

    Exactly! Won with a roster made mostly of three star players and players OSU didn't want. Should really win with better talent.

    blue in ohio

  • blue in ohio said...

    Exactly! Won with a roster made mostly of three star players and players OSU didn't want. Should really win with better talent.

    Oh i think you forgot the easy schedule & 8 home games.. not to mention the lucky bounces, if you beat MSU last season, you deserved the sugar bowl, but you didn't.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ball not soo hard !!

    ghBuck23

  • ghBuck23 said...

    Oh i think you forgot the easy schedule & 8 home games.. not to mention the lucky bounces, if you beat MSU last season, you deserved the sugar bowl, but you didn't.

    With the way SCUM fans are acting you would think we were them for the last 10 years and got our butts handed to us last year. Wow if you guys beat us 50-0 last season it would have been warranted, but to claim you guys are back after one lucky season is outlandish. Considering all the facts. I guess its the little man syndrome, you guys have been owned by us so much one little win over a team with no head coach and freshmen and 1st year starters is enough to convince you guys that you are back. Wow how low your standards have gotten, dominate a decade, then we will talk. We literally wiped you guys away from the CFL world, I guess you only admit the RR era, but you guys hired him and it comes. Urban Meyer is here to restore order, talk garbage when the season starts. Braxton Miller will never lose to you guyz again. We are SCUM killers !!

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ball not soo hard !!

    ghBuck23