-
sugarcrystal
- 4 stars Rating: 70
1463 votes total - (2029)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
DSBUX
- 4 stars Rating: 65
1569 votes total - O-H I-O
- (1162)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
foubazzi ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
2835 votes total - Fouad Bazzi
- (2231)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
drmiller166
- 5 stars Rating: 92
5039 votes total - (2885)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sugarcrystal said...
The one thing that concerns me and it's probably much ado about nothing are some of the defensive recruits we're bringing in vs the type Saban goes after.
Now don't get me wrong: we've done a great job in building depth on the defensive line like never before, however, as I watch this draft more and more and see how Saban is putting LB'ers into the NFL who're around the upper 240s-260 lb range and most of ours are around 225-235 lbs. Then couple that with our DE's being in the 245-250 lb range and theirs 270-285 lbs (prototypical NFL size), I wonder how it may affect us in big games.
Alabama, LSU and Georgia in particular have prototypically sized LBers and DEs and when they hit, you feel the impact. These guys run like gazelles and hit like Mack trucks due to their size. Maybe again this is much ado about nothing but I think we need to have more prototypically sized defensive ends and linebackers and fewer hybrid types. Often here I hear a defensive coach say that if a LB'er prospect who's around 235-240 range puts on any additional weight (say 5-15 lbs) that he'll have to put his hand in the dirt, i.e. play as a DE. They don't say this in the SEC because the LBers and DEs they get are about already NFL size or damn near it by the time they arrive on campus.
The only prototypically sized DE we've had in recent years was Cam Heyward with the LB'er sized Nathan Williams on the other end. I will give us credit though for finally going after prototypically sized DTs which is something it took us years to get to after having Doug Worthington playing on the inside. We now have Hankins, Bennett with Schutt coming in with Simon being our version of Alabama's recently drafted Courtney Upshaw.
So my hope is that in time we'll get some of those nasty, tree-trunk arm sized DEs and LB'ers who have QBs, RBs and receivers reversing field 15 yards just to try and avoid them. Because they know if and when they hit, it may be the end of their careers.
While at Florida, Meyer's LBers and DEs were for the most part prototypically sized such as Brandon Spikes who weighed in around the 250 range and Carlos Dunlap, Derek Harvey, Dominique Easley among others. I just hope we don't continue Tressel's trend (and the B10's in general) of having a defensive lineup consisting of LBers playing DE and DEs playing inside while operating in a basic 4-3. Again, maybe I'm making a mountain out of molehill because we've yet to see how any of this will pan out in the Fall but I'm just looking at how the SEC defenses operate and how the B10 continues to.
And based on just some of the DE recruits we've landed in recent days, just asking some questions early on even though I know and understand they could get switched to other positions as well.
-
drmiller166 said...
Defensive ends in the NFL aren't necessarily big. More teams are going to a 3-4 defense, which requires ends to be in the 275-295 range, but 4-3 teams don't need ends that size. I've been a Colts fan for years, and smaller guys like Robert Mathis and Dwight Freeney have been the strength of the defense. If you get two strong tackles, you can get away with smaller ends who get into the backfield and disrupt the offense with their speed.
sugarcrystal
- 4 stars Rating: 70
1463 votes total - (2029)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
drmiller166 said...
Defensive ends in the NFL aren't necessarily big. More teams are going to a 3-4 defense, which requires ends to be in the 275-295 range, but 4-3 teams don't need ends that size. I've been a Colts fan for years, and smaller guys like Robert Mathis and Dwight Freeney have been the strength of the defense. If you get two strong tackles, you can get away with smaller ends who get into the backfield and disrupt the offense with their speed.
-
Gobucks187TTUN
- 4 stars Rating: 80
3967 votes total - (3520)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
3ydncloudofdust
- 5 stars Rating: 93
5135 votes total - Lord of the Flies
- (5968)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Gobucks187TTUN
- 4 stars Rating: 80
3967 votes total - (3520)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
sugarcrystal said...
The one thing that concerns me and it's probably much ado about nothing are some of the defensive recruits we're bringing in vs the type Saban goes after.
Now don't get me wrong: we've done a great job in building depth on the defensive line like never before, however, as I watch this draft more and more and see how Saban is putting LB'ers into the NFL who're around the upper 240s-260 lb range and most of ours are around 225-235 lbs. Then couple that with our DE's being in the 245-250 lb range and theirs 270-285 lbs (prototypical NFL size), I wonder how it may affect us in big games.
Alabama, LSU and Georgia in particular have prototypically sized LBers and DEs and when they hit, you feel the impact. These guys run like gazelles and hit like Mack trucks due to their size. Maybe again this is much ado about nothing but I think we need to have more prototypically sized defensive ends and linebackers and fewer hybrid types. Often here I hear a defensive coach say that if a LB'er prospect who's around 235-240 range puts on any additional weight (say 5-15 lbs) that he'll have to put his hand in the dirt, i.e. play as a DE. They don't say this in the SEC because the LBers and DEs they get are about already NFL size or damn near it by the time they arrive on campus.
The only prototypically sized DE we've had in recent years was Cam Heyward with the LB'er sized Nathan Williams on the other end. I will give us credit though for finally going after prototypically sized DTs which is something it took us years to get to after having Doug Worthington playing on the inside. We now have Hankins, Bennett with Schutt coming in with Simon being our version of Alabama's recently drafted Courtney Upshaw.
So my hope is that in time we'll get some of those nasty, tree-trunk arm sized DEs and LB'ers who have QBs, RBs and receivers reversing field 15 yards just to try and avoid them. Because they know if and when they hit, it may be the end of their careers.
While at Florida, Meyer's LBers and DEs were for the most part prototypically sized such as Brandon Spikes who weighed in around the 250 range and Carlos Dunlap, Derek Harvey, Dominique Easley among others. I just hope we don't continue Tressel's trend (and the B10's in general) of having a defensive lineup consisting of LBers playing DE and DEs playing inside while operating in a basic 4-3. Again, maybe I'm making a mountain out of molehill because we've yet to see how any of this will pan out in the Fall but I'm just looking at how the SEC defenses operate and how the B10 continues to.
And based on just some of the DE recruits we've landed in recent days, just asking some questions early on even though I know and understand they could get switched to other positions as well.
-
Gobucks187TTUN said...
They are underclassmen. They are 18 year old kids. Comparing 18-19 year old kids to 22 year old men and then saying "Why are our players smaller?" doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Kids grow. Simon was around 285-290 as a strong side end last year. You left him out. Why? He seems to fit the prototypical NFL size for a sse.
-
Be Cool12 said...
I'm not that concerned with our size at d-end because they are intended to be speed rushers. Saban uses his entire d-line to overpower the pro-style offenses of the SEC. Most of the lines in the BIG are pro-style but their offfensive tackles aren't as athletic as the SEC's. I think Meyer intends to use our ends force the opponents inside, where we have size at defensive tackle and linebacker.














Should we be concerned about the lack of size of our DEs?