Online Now 1036

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

On this Board 169
Record: 4078 (1/25/2013)

Online now 1053
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

You People Are Crazy

  • I know that Ohio State has had a lot of stuff going on over the last year. And people keep saying well if Luke does this or that. Bottom line is Ohio State has hands down the most TALENT in the Big Ten and it is not even close. That fact rarely comes up!

    With that being said I am not bashing Luke, I like him I just do not think he is ready to be a big time football program head coach yet. If Urban wants to come to Columbus then I say we have no choice but to bring him in with open arms. I'd love for him to keep Luke on the staff!

    dabighurt08

  • ncgapp said...

    The real question is whether Saban and Meyer could have excelled without coaching at BG and Toledo.

    Bob Stoops was not an HC before getting the Oklahoma job, and he's done fine. Mike Gundy was not an HC before getting the Oklahoma State job and he's done pretty well also. Even Nick Saban coached Toledo for all of 1 year before leaving for the NFL as a coordinator. Then Michigan State hired him. Hardly a ton of experience there.

    I'd like to let the season play out (including the bowl game) before making a determination on whether Luke should be considered for the permanent job. Odds are against him getting the permanent gig, but I do NOT want to write him off simply because he lacks prior HC experience. His biggest problem has been an unimaginative offense, but I would suspect if he stays that much of the offensive staff will be replaced.

    +1 Give him a real chance.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Old gray man just ain't what he used to be ain't what used to be.

    cuttyrock

  • Attempting to compare Fickel to Tressel coming out of YSU shows a true lack of knowledge.
    Tressel had 17 YEARS of HEAD COACHING experience, had won MULTIPLE national Championships, and was on the short list for every BIG coaching vacancy in the country.
    The ONLY reason he stayed at YSU was he wanted the OSU job. It was his dream job.
    Fickel has ZERO experience until this year and has zero experience at any level. HE'S LEARNING ON THE JOB. I don't kniw baout you all, but OSU is not a place where you learn the ropes of being a coach.
    Its a premium job for a premium guy.
    I can't believe some of you want a unknown guy with no experience to run this program. Its unfathomable to me.

    chuck0609

  • chuck0609 said...

    Attempting to compare Fickel to Tressel coming out of YSU shows a true lack of knowledge. Tressel had 17 YEARS of HEAD COACHING experience, had won MULTIPLE national Championships, and was on the short list for every BIG coaching vacancy in the country. The ONLY reason he stayed at YSU was he wanted the OSU job. It was his dream job. Fickel has ZERO experience until this year and has zero experience at any level. HE'S LEARNING ON THE JOB. I don't kniw baout you all, but OSU is not a place where you learn the ropes of being a coach. Its a premium job for a premium guy. I can't believe some of you want a unknown guy with no experience to run this program. Its unfathomable to me.

    Fickell is an unknown guy. Has the school record for consecutive games started. Over 8 years coaching experience with OSU. A great recruiter for the defense and has great relationships with his players. If he is 11-3 with a Rose Bowl win then he did a damn good job LEARNING ON THE JOB.

    OHIORULES

  • dabighurt08 said...

    I know that Ohio State has had a lot of stuff going on over the last year. And people keep saying well if Luke does this or that. Bottom line is Ohio State has hands down the most TALENT in the Big Ten and it is not even close. That fact rarely comes up!

    With that being said I am not bashing Luke, I like him I just do not think he is ready to be a big time football program head coach yet. If Urban wants to come to Columbus then I say we have no choice but to bring him in with open arms. I'd love for him to keep Luke on the staff!

    Great Post, but talent doesn't always equal wins. Ohio State does have the most talent in the B1G but it is young talent. They will continue to improve every week and that is the key. Next year this team can be special.

    OHIORULES

  • OSUrox said...

    most if not all of those coaches had experience at numerous schools under several different coaches to learn their craft. Stoops was at Iowa, KSU, FLA under Fry, Snyder and Spurrier. Yes, no HC experience, but learned for 16 yrs from a few of the best. Saban had 16 yrs of coaching at several different school before he became a HC----AT A MAC SCHOOL! But it's OK for Luke to learn under only 1 coach and get a HC at one of the top 5 schools on earth?

    I also see a lot of OC and DC in your posts, our current interim coach does not even have that. he may have had a co-DC title, but Heacock has always been the DC.

    Plus, this is OSU. I don't care who Houston, Clemson, WVU, Boise hired. Give me a break. We are OSU.

    First, the statement that was made was that "no one starts at the top." It didn't allow for any exceptions. I refuted that statement. If your best response is to say you don't care about who Houston, Clemson, WVU and Boise hired, then you completely missed the point.

    Secondly, I'm well aware this is OSU. I am more than familiar with our history of hiring coaches. The reality is we don't have that many options to choose from and Fickell's in the top 5. In fact, right now, his name is the only one on the list because it's his job to lose. It's not where you start but where you finish that counts. There's still a lot of football to be played before anyone writes this guy off. The more people do this assine whining of "This is OSU! He's got to be shipped off to coaching Siberia to earn his stripes in HC graveyards in places like Kent or Ypsilanti or Ames or Akron before he can be HC here," the more it makes me want to root for the guy.

    Third, since you obviously need further education, let's go: JoePa only coached for Rip Engle at PSU...for 15 years. With the exception of one year as OC at East Carolina, Mark Richt only coached for Bobby Bowden at FSU. With the exception of one year as OC at that Cradle of Coaches, Austin College in Texas, Bill Snyder only coached for Hayden Fry, first at North Texas and then at Iowa. Frank Solich only coached for Tom Osborne, who only coached for Bob Devaney.

    Conversely, in the 18 years before he became HC at TCU, Gary Patterson had 11 AC jobs, none for more than 3 years, six of them for no more than 1 season. How much do you really think he learned in the single seasons he spent at coaching juggernauts like UC Davis, Pittsburg State, Cal Lutheran, the Oregon Lightning Bolts (????) and Navy? They were nothing more than stepping stone jobs that eventually got him the DC job at TCU, which became the HC job. But to hear you say it, they mean more than Fickell's nine years coaching for Jim Tressel at OSU. At most of those stops Patterson probably had a P.O. Box for his mail because he wasn't there long enough to remember where he lived. I'm sure you'll dis his addition to my list but I'd bet you'd be happy to have at HC at OSU. Or are we only OK hiring HCs from Miami of Ohio, Iowa State and Youngstown State? And before you brag up Miami as the real Cradle of Coaches, name their last good coach--Randy Walker? Otherwise, Woody Hayes was a long, long, long time ago.

    I don't care whether Fickell was DC or Co-DC. He's the HC now and he's Heacock's boss. He was the guy who stepped up and took it, not Heacock. That's what matters. That and it's his job to lose.

    One last thing: I used the BCS Top 25 as my metric. It was the most logical standard if we're looking for CURRENT coaching excellence. You're using your head up your ass for yours. If you want me to go deeper into the list, just say the word. Just know that it means your head will only go deeper up your ass.

    iowabuckeyes

  • iowabuckeyes said...

    First, the statement that was made was that "no one starts at the top." It didn't allow for any exceptions. I refuted that statement. If your best response is to say you don't care about who Houston, Clemson, WVU and Boise hired, then you completely missed the point.

    Secondly, I'm well aware this is OSU. I am more than familiar with our history of hiring coaches. The reality is we don't have that many options to choose from and Fickell's in the top 5. In fact, right now, his name is the only one on the list because it's his job to lose. It's not where you start but where you finish that counts. There's still a lot of football to be played before anyone writes this guy off. The more people do this assine whining of "This is OSU! He's got to be shipped off to coaching Siberia to earn his stripes in HC graveyards in places like Kent or Ypsilanti or Ames or Akron before he can be HC here," the more it makes me want to root for the guy.

    Third, since you obviously need further education, let's go: JoePa only coached for Rip Engle at PSU...for 15 years. With the exception of one year as OC at East Carolina, Mark Richt only coached for Bobby Bowden at FSU. With the exception of one year as OC at that Cradle of Coaches, Austin College in Texas, Bill Snyder only coached for Hayden Fry, first at North Texas and then at Iowa. Frank Solich only coached for Tom Osborne, who only coached for Bob Devaney.

    Conversely, in the 18 years before he became HC at TCU, Gary Patterson had 11 AC jobs, none for more than 3 years, six of them for no more than 1 season. How much do you really think he learned in the single seasons he spent at coaching juggernauts like UC Davis, Pittsburg State, Cal Lutheran, the Oregon Lightning Bolts (????) and Navy? They were nothing more than stepping stone jobs that eventually got him the DC job at TCU, which became the HC job. But to hear you say it, they mean more than Fickell's nine years coaching for Jim Tressel at OSU. At most of those stops Patterson probably had a P.O. Box for his mail because he wasn't there long enough to remember where he lived. I'm sure you'll dis his addition to my list but I'd bet you'd be happy to have at HC at OSU. Or are we only OK hiring HCs from Miami of Ohio, Iowa State and Youngstown State? And before you brag up Miami as the real Cradle of Coaches, name their last good coach--Randy Walker? Otherwise, Woody Hayes was a long, long, long time ago.

    I don't care whether Fickell was DC or Co-DC. He's the HC now and he's Heacock's boss. He was the guy who stepped up and took it, not Heacock. That's what matters. That and it's his job to lose.

    One last thing: I used the BCS Top 25 as my metric. It was the most logical standard if we're looking for CURRENT coaching excellence. You're using your head up your ass for yours. If you want me to go deeper into the list, just say the word. Just know that it means your head will only go deeper up your ass.

    If you think we have the next Joe Pa....good for you Iowa. Bill Snyder??? Frank Solich??? I think you make OSURox point there my friend. I don't want the next Snyder or Solich.

    Same with Patterson...you make OSURox point as well. He had 18 yrs experience at 11 different places learning from different people...stepping stones as you say.

    Mark Richt???? Really?

    And Joe Pa was an asst at PSU for 16 yrs. He didn't come out of the womb as PSU HC.

    So you came up with Snyder, Solich, Mark Richt as examples of reasons why Fickell may succeed. Yikes!! I rest my case. Patterson doesn't count because that is a reason AGAINST Fick....once Fick gets 18 yrs experience under 11 different philosophies you can use him.

    Try harder. So yah, get deeper. And try and do so without calling people names and telling them their head is up their ass.

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by boomboom on 11/1/2011 at 7:16 AM

    boomboom

  • OHIORULES said...

    You are right Luke is not a top-tier coach yet, but Tressel was not either when he came to Ohio State. Yeah Tressel had experience in 1aa but not at top BCS school.

    Come on now...

    IndyDog

  • OHIORULES said...

    Fickell is an unknown guy. Has the school record for consecutive games started. Over 8 years coaching experience with OSU. A great recruiter for the defense and has great relationships with his players. If he is 11-3 with a Rose Bowl win then he did a damn good job LEARNING ON THE JOB.

    this is about HEAD COACHING EXPERIENCE !!!

    You're attempting to replace HC experience with playing time, player relationships when he's NOT in charge, and a mythical Rose bowl win. As far as relationships, how about Carlos Hyde right now? Or TY Williams? Perhaps Guiton and Graham? Why on earth would you CONTINUE to start Joe B? Timeouts during the Miami game? Nebraska's second half? Whisky's last 5 minutes? You're also assuming recruiting, player development and discipline will remain the same with Luke in charge. that's a HUGE assumption risk that can effect the program for the next 5-10 years.

    You like Fickel, and most here do (I do too). But he's not READY to be the coach at OSU. He needs to learn the ropes as a HC. OSU is not a starter school for coaches, its a destination.

    IF he ends up being the coach, I can live with that. But not if Urban Meyer wants the job. Meyer is a proven commodity, Fickel is not.

    This post was edited by chuck0609 on 11/1/2011 at 7:43 AM

    chuck0609

  • I've said this before in another thread and I'll say it again here. Regardless of what Fickell does the rest of the season, OSU needs to open up the coaching search, see who's interested and make the best decision from the available choices. If that turns out to be Fickell, I'm all in with him. But, they have to go through the process.

    You don't make coaching decisions, or hiring decisions of any kind in ANY field, based on emotions. You don't hire Fickell after one emotional win over Wisconsin. Period. Or one emotional season, for that matter. Someone mentioned Dana Holgorsen at WV as evidence that hiring a coach with no HC experience can work. What they failed to mention is that Holgorsen took over for a guy, Bill Stewart, that was hired after one emotional Fiesta Bowl upset win over Oklahoma. By the way, who hasn't upset Oklahoma in a Fiesta Bowl, am I right? How did that Bill Stewart hire work out?

    If Fickell can go 11-3 with wins in the B1G championship and Rose Bowl, it would go down as one of the greatest coaching achievements in Ohio State history. And I still wouldn't fault Gene Smith for bringing guys in for interviews. He has to see who wants the job first and make the best decision possible, whether that turns out to be Luke or someone else.

    This post was edited by Kid Columbus on 11/1/2011 at 7:52 AM

    Kid Columbus: Keeping the street of Columbus safe from Wolverines since 1998!

    Kid Columbus

  • Well, this thread is pointless because Fickell won't go 11-3. If by some chance we happen to win out the rest of our regular season games, which is doubtful, there is no way this current coaching staff will win the B1G Championship game and a BCS bowl game. Its just not happening. I mean seriously, did you guys not watch the Wisconsin game? That game was in the bag. We had a 12 point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and blew it. Braxton Miller won us that game, not Fickell's coaching. Fickell's coaching gave Wisconsin the lead with 1:18 to play. We witnessed the only gametime adjustment Fickell has made all year (having our D switch from what had shut Wisconsin down all night to a prevent/permit defense) blow a 12 point lead by giving up 15 points in 3 minutes of play. And, don't get me started on the win over Illinois. They were a paper tiger - totally overrated. They had not played anyone until they played us and we beat them with only one completion the whole game.

    I love who Fickell is and what he has done. He is a great Buckeye, but just because he is a great Buckeye, doesn't make him ready to coach the Buckeyes at this point in time. Maybe one day he will be ready, but he isn't right now. I hope to high heaven that the BOT and Gene Smith have more sense and football smarts then all you people who think beating Illinois and Wisconsin makes Fickell the man for the job.

    signature image

    ”Well, it’s not challenging when you go 12-0 and Urban Meyer is your head coach and you’re wearing the Block O on your shirts.”

    buckeyeundrgrnd

  • This post was edited by buckeyeundrgrnd on 11/1/2011 at 8:08 AM

    signature image

    ”Well, it’s not challenging when you go 12-0 and Urban Meyer is your head coach and you’re wearing the Block O on your shirts.”

    buckeyeundrgrnd

  • buckeyeundrgrnd said...

    Well, this thread is pointless because Fickell won't go 11-3. If by some chance we happen to win out the rest of our regular season games, which is doubtful, there is no way this current coaching staff will win the B1G Championship game and a BCS bowl game. Its just not happening. I mean seriously, did you guys not watch the Wisconsin game? That game was in the bag. We had a 12 point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and blew it. Braxton Miller won us that game, not Fickell's coaching. Fickell's coaching gave Wisconsin the lead with 1:18 to play. We witnessed the only gametime adjustment Fickell has made all year (having our D switch from what had shut Wisconsin down all night to a prevent/permit defense) blow a 12 point lead by giving up 15 points in 3 minutes of play. And, don't get me started on the win over Illinois. They were a paper tiger - totally overrated. They had not played anyone until they played us and we beat them with only one completion the whole game.

    I love who Fickell is and what he has done. He is a great Buckeye, but just because he is a great Buckeye, doesn't make him ready to coach the Buckeyes at this point in time. Maybe one day he will be ready, but he isn't right now. I hope to high heaven that the BOT and Gene Smith have more sense and football smarts then all you people who think beating Illinois and Wisconsin makes Fickell the man for the job.

    people forget things easily. amazing how braxton's start of greatness made fickell go from extreme goat, blowing a 12 point lead with 5 minutes left to suddenly keeping his job. people make me laugh on this site

    signature image signature image

    great2belucky

  • buckeyeundrgrnd said...

    Well, this thread is pointless because Fickell won't go 11-3. If by some chance we happen to win out the rest of our regular season games, which is doubtful, there is no way this current coaching staff will win the B1G Championship game and a BCS bowl game. Its just not happening. I mean seriously, did you guys not watch the Wisconsin game? That game was in the bag. We had a 12 point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and blew it. Braxton Miller won us that game, not Fickell's coaching. Fickell's coaching gave Wisconsin the lead with 1:18 to play. We witnessed the only gametime adjustment Fickell has made all year (having our D switch from what had shut Wisconsin down all night to a prevent/permit defense) blow a 12 point lead by giving up 15 points in 3 minutes of play. And, don't get me started on the win over Illinois. They were a paper tiger - totally overrated. They had not played anyone until they played us and we beat them with only one completion the whole game.

    I love who Fickell is and what he has done. He is a great Buckeye, but just because he is a great Buckeye, doesn't make him ready to coach the Buckeyes at this point in time. Maybe one day he will be ready, but he isn't right now. I hope to high heaven that the BOT and Gene Smith have more sense and football smarts then all you people who think beating Illinois and Wisconsin makes Fickell the man for the job.

    Agreed, Buckeyeundergrnd and Lucky!

    I too cannot believe people are all the sudden talking as if we are going to win the BIG and a BCS Bowl. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

    If not for the clutch performance of one Braxton Miller, every poster on here would be cursing Fickell right now.

    But for one solitary play — broken play if I am not mistaken — all of the sudden Fickell is the next JoPa!

    And no team that throws seven passes a game is going to win a BCS game, sorry.

    This post was edited by miguelissimo on 11/1/2011 at 8:22 AM

    "Buckeye born and bred, a Buckeye 'til I'm dead"

    miguelissimo

  • great2belucky said...

    people forget things easily. amazing how braxton's start of greatness made fickell go from extreme goat, blowing a 12 point lead with 5 minutes left to suddenly keeping his job. people make me laugh on this site

    So, breakdowns in defensive pass coverage are the coach's fault, but Braxton keeping his eyes
    upfield instead of solely looking to run was 100% Braxton and no coaching?

    Seriously?

    We won, let's enjoy that part. Whatever will be with the coaching at season's end will be.
    I think we will have a new HC next year. I do not necessarily think Luke is the next
    Joe Pa, or Saban. But I do think he's done an admirable job so far in difficult
    circumstances, and I hope we are starting to turn the corner and can finish
    the year well. If we do so, and LF is interviewed with a chance to get the full-time
    gig, then great.

    signature image

    ncgapp

  • ncgapp said...

    So, breakdowns in defensive pass coverage are the coach's fault, but Braxton keeping his eyes upfield instead of solely looking to run was 100% Braxton and no coaching?

    Seriously?

    No. The hail mary was more a breakdown in WI coverage. ie, more a WI coaching gaff than any great OSU coaching. There was an article in a WI paper about the breakdown in coverage and a miscommunication. Luckily that happened so now Fickell can be the coach the next 10 yrs.

    LuvtheBuckeyes

  • ncgapp said...

    So, breakdowns in defensive pass coverage are the coach's fault, but Braxton keeping his eyes upfield instead of solely looking to run was 100% Braxton and no coaching?

    Seriously?

    We won, let's enjoy that part. Whatever will be with the coaching at season's end will be. I think we will have a new HC next year. I do not necessarily think Luke is the next Joe Pa, or Saban. But I do think he's done an admirable job so far in difficult circumstances, and I hope we are starting to turn the corner and can finish the year well. If we do so, and LF is interviewed with a chance to get the full-time gig, then great.

    i agree i am enjoying it. but it's simply a fact that they were 20 seconds from blowing a 12 point lead, to add on to blowing a 21 point lead in nebraska. every single person on here would be calling for his head if we lose that game, you know i know along with every other dweeb saying fickell should be our coach. enough with he's getting this job, he isnt. i like fick, think he'll be our head coach in about 10 years, he's not ready now. hard to argue that. i give him a ton of credit since this team could have easily quit on him after the melt down in nebraska it doesnt take away this teams melt downs at the end of games and the knuckle head play calling. it wasnt even the offense this week, but with 20 seconds what was our special teams plan? kick it out of bounds that's a good idea

    signature image signature image

    great2belucky

  • Kid Columbus said...

    I've said this before in another thread and I'll say it again here. Regardless of what Fickell does the rest of the season, OSU needs to open up the coaching search, see who's interested and make the best decision from the available choices. If that turns out to be Fickell, I'm all in with him. But, they have to go through the process.

    You don't make coaching decisions, or hiring decisions of any kind in ANY field, based on emotions. You don't hire Fickell after one emotional win over Wisconsin. Period. Or one emotional season, for that matter. Someone mentioned Dana Holgorsen at WV as evidence that hiring a coach with no HC experience can work. What they failed to mention is that Holgorsen took over for a guy, Bill Stewart, that was hired after one emotional Fiesta Bowl upset win over Oklahoma. By the way, who hasn't upset Oklahoma in a Fiesta Bowl, am I right? How did that Bill Stewart hire work out?

    If Fickell can go 11-3 with wins in the B1G championship and Rose Bowl, it would go down as one of the greatest coaching achievements in Ohio State history. And I still wouldn't fault Gene Smith for bringing guys in for interviews. He has to see who wants the job first and make the best decision possible, whether that turns out to be Luke or someone else.

    +1

    100% spot on. This situation must be evaluated with a fine toothed comb. All things have to be considered. Great example with Bill Stewart.

    I like Luke Fickell. I think with what he's had to deal with and endure he's done a top notch job so far. Sure he has faults.....he is somewhat learning on the job which for tOSU is not a great situation to have. Some obvious things stand out like game preparation, management etc. You have to consider who he beat, who he lost to....why that happened...and most importantly....let's say Fickell manages to go 11-3 with a Rose Bowl or BCS bowl victory. You have to ask the question: What are the chances of Fickell repeating that success? Is it possible? Do you allow him to make coaching changes and truly turn the team over to him?

    Because I think that's ultimately what has to be done if they consider keeping Luke Fickell as head coach.

    Furthermore...we've all heard the rumors about Urban Meyer. Quite frankly there's not a more qualified candidate for hire than this man. Not one. His resume speaks for itself. Like him or not...the man is the best college coach that can be hired if he's available. You'd have to be a fool not to at the very least pursue this man and make it known that you are interested in him......and IMO.....give him every consideration to be your next head coach. Equal to if not a little more than your current interim head coach.

    What we have to consider is that this is not in the slightest anything personal. It's strictly business. And tOSU is in the business of winning Big Ten championships, beating the $hit out of scUM....and contending hopefully for national titles.

    Bearbuck

  • Kid Columbus said...

    I've said this before in another thread and I'll say it again here. Regardless of what Fickell does the rest of the season, OSU needs to open up the coaching search, see who's interested and make the best decision from the available choices. If that turns out to be Fickell, I'm all in with him. But, they have to go through the process.

    You don't make coaching decisions, or hiring decisions of any kind in ANY field, based on emotions. You don't hire Fickell after one emotional win over Wisconsin. Period. Or one emotional season, for that matter. Someone mentioned Dana Holgorsen at WV as evidence that hiring a coach with no HC experience can work. What they failed to mention is that Holgorsen took over for a guy, Bill Stewart, that was hired after one emotional Fiesta Bowl upset win over Oklahoma. By the way, who hasn't upset Oklahoma in a Fiesta Bowl, am I right? How did that Bill Stewart hire work out?

    If Fickell can go 11-3 with wins in the B1G championship and Rose Bowl, it would go down as one of the greatest coaching achievements in Ohio State history. And I still wouldn't fault Gene Smith for bringing guys in for interviews. He has to see who wants the job first and make the best decision possible, whether that turns out to be Luke or someone else.

    I agree that we will and should cast a wide net this offseason in looking for a coach.

    But I have no problem considering Luke for the full-time job at year's end if we end well. Emotional or not, if we
    finish well this year and don't consider him for the job, we will effectively be saying "winning at Ohio State as HC
    this year in no way suggests that in the future you could be successful in winning at Ohio State as HC".

    If we go in the tank and finish 6-6 then obviously we solely look elsewhere.

    signature image

    ncgapp

  • I continue to be amazed at the manlove for Urban Meyer because of what he accomplished in 2006 and 2008. For all of you who think he would pull that off at OSU are completely wrong. First of all, the SPREAD offense is beginning to be defensed. You look at the best teams now, they run a Pro-style offense. Spread teams are not able to consistently run the ball. Sorry, but in the Big Ten, you are going to need to run and pass. The Spread needs quick and agile linemen, something we do not have and will not have for several years. We cannot get a decent lineman now to save our lives due to the reputation of Bollman. Braxton Miller would be a good spread QB, but who is going to be the RB after Jordan Hall leaves. You need FAST RB's to make the Spread work, and then we get to the WR's where none of them fit the mold of Spread WR.

    So let's say Urban comes in and immediately gets the PR and closes a strong recruiting class. It will take years to change the talent at OSU to match what Urban had at Florida. Almost seems as if we would be following in the RichRod steps. Going backwards to go forwards? 3 years down the line, Urban will have another "medical issue" because he is tired of hearing boos during the games and we get to start over again. Urban proved last year that his offense only works when he has the exact skill set. That skill set is not here at OSU.

    That being said, IMO Luke Fickell is not the right coach either. It has been obvious several times this season that he is in over his head. This is no place to have on the job training. Fickell has spent his entire career under Jim Tressel. There are other coaches out there that have coached under several different head coaches which would be significantly better. For those of you who think Gruden is coming here, think again. I played golf with Gruden in Tampa a couple of times in the the past two years and he loves what he is doing and making a ton of dough to do it. He will not be coming to OSU as the next coach. If he coaches again, it will be in the NFL. He has a couple of talented kids that he wants to get through school, what he is doing now affords him that opportunity.

    Chris Petersen is not coming to OSU. He has seen how badly other very successful Boise coaches have faired at high profile schools. It did not end well for either. Patterson will stay at TCU, especially since it is now part of the Big 12. Not sure that Pellini is a good long term fit at OSU either, the dude has serious attitude issues and will rub people the wrong way. Nebraska fans are beginning to call him Bi-polar Bo. Dantonio is a great coach, but a Tressel clone, and will probably keep a lot of the current staff, pass. Tim Beckman may ultimately be the best choice if you want someone with Ohio ties that has previous HC experience. Again however, I do not believe his offense is the best long term solution for OSU.

    I would vote for Mel Tucker. He has coached under several highly successful coaches once he left OSU. He knows OSU and coaches in the state of Ohio. He will well respected in the NFL and the NCAA. Recruits may have a hard time with the choice at first, but he is a guy that once you meet him you will follow him. He is a leader and that is what OSU needs right now. The man was a recruiting machine at OSU when he was here and once he left (along with Dantonio) our recruiting began to suffer for it.

    beemerbuck

  • norsk said...

    What do you mean, you people?

    The HATERS

    OHIORULES

  • LuvtheBuckeyes said...

    No. The hail mary was more a breakdown in WI coverage. ie, more a WI coaching gaff than any great OSU coaching. There was an article in a WI paper about the breakdown in coverage and a miscommunication. Luckily that happened so now Fickell can be the coach the next 10 yrs.

    I maintain that teaching a Freshman QB with outstanding running ability to keep his eyes looking downfield is heavily attributable to coaching, regardless
    of whatever Wisconsin was doing on D at the time.

    This post was edited by ncgapp on 11/1/2011 at 9:25 AM

    signature image

    ncgapp

  • This idea of Fickell lacking head coaching experience is not going to play a major factor in the decision-making process in my opinion. As pointed out, promoting an up and coming assistant is a common practice. Secondly, because he will have a full season under his belt by the time of his evaluation and will have faced some very tough challenges over the course of that season, it basically makes this one season of experience worth multiple years of head coaching at a smaller school.

    As far as football knowledge that a head coach needs, I would say at 37 years old, given his playing and coaching experience, he has plenty. He also has extensive experience recruiting.

    I believe this will come down to how well he does the rest of the season, and what he tells them in the interview as far as his future plans go to improve the offensive scheme, play calling, and potential coaching changes. He needs to express his coaching philosophy. How much will he delegate and to whom.

    I still agree with the title of this thread. They will not can the guy if he wins out. The only way a demotion would work is if they bring in an older guy and name Fickell a coach in waiting. Firing a guy who could win a Rose Bowl is absolutely unthinkable, impossible for me to imagine them doing such a thing. If something like that happened, Fickell would be at Penn St. in a heartbeat and would be kicking our asses for years to come.

    JAG24

  • I will be pulling for the Buckeyes in every game they play and hoping Fickell can win out, but honestly, I just don't see that happening. Do you honestly think we can beat Stanford or Oregon in the Rose Bowl? It isn't happening this year, not with this offensive game plan.

    After last season, Fickell couldn't even get hired by Miami of Ohio. Do you people honestly believe that now all of a sudden because he beat Illinois and Wisconsin he will be JoePa's successor if we don't hire him? And then take a step further and think he will be kicking our tails for years to come there? JoePa doesn't even kick our tails ... what makes you think Fickell will?

    I love Ohio State. I think Fickell is a great Buckeye and a great person. I hope that one day he will be a great head coach, and maybe even for the Buckeyes, but he isn't that right now. This team is 5-3 and lucky to be that ... we easily could have lost to both Toledo and Wisconsin. Contrary to what some people post on here, Tressel did not leave the cupboard bare here. I know there was all the off season turnmoil, suspensions and everything that Fickell has had to deal with (which was Tressel's fault), but even with that, we have a super talented team (IMO more talented than every team we have played to include Wisconsin) with almost the entire coaching staff intact. Fickell didn't have to step in and create something from nothing. If it were not for poor coaching (bad play calling, poor personnel decisions, failure to properly manage the game, etc.) we would be at least be 7-1 if not 8-0 right now.

    No matter what happens, Ohio State needs to look at all of the available options, to include Fickell, and hire the best guy for the job.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by buckeyeundrgrnd on 11/1/2011 at 9:53 AM

    signature image

    ”Well, it’s not challenging when you go 12-0 and Urban Meyer is your head coach and you’re wearing the Block O on your shirts.”

    buckeyeundrgrnd

  • Chuman said...

    This is the reason I don't come on this site very often anymore. Let me say that I like Luke and what he has done for University. I still think Luke can be a terrific coach, but inexperience players, young players, blah blah blah. It's like watching a high school team out there. You people out there can keep your we won the game all you want. Yes we did. But why recruit QB's. Serious why????? Why not run the wishbone or triple option. Let's just line up 3 RBs and play smash mouth power run game all day long. This kills me to say, but I am torn this year. I want the Buckeyes to win- don't get me wrong, but watching this crappy offense for another year is turning me off. I watch all these other teams play and develop their QB, but not us. We have another running QB, that does just that- run. Each game we win, we are going to have these threads about keeping Luke. And that's what I am torn on. Do you really want this offense each and every year????? Really????? Winning out and getting killed in the bowl game by a good team will make you want to keep Luke. I have seen 10 + years of pathetic offenses, it's time to move on. I can't go another 5-8 years with Luke and crappy offenses. I just can't.

    I guess I am turning into the "Hater" on this board. It sucks, but I am tired of lack of offense productivity. On the other note- our defense (besides that collapse in the 4th qrt) is pretty good.

    Are you for real!!!!!!!!

    buckahilly