-
ncgapp said...
The real question is whether Saban and Meyer could have excelled without coaching at BG and Toledo.
Bob Stoops was not an HC before getting the Oklahoma job, and he's done fine. Mike Gundy was not an HC before getting the Oklahoma State job and he's done pretty well also. Even Nick Saban coached Toledo for all of 1 year before leaving for the NFL as a coordinator. Then Michigan State hired him. Hardly a ton of experience there.
I'd like to let the season play out (including the bowl game) before making a determination on whether Luke should be considered for the permanent job. Odds are against him getting the permanent gig, but I do NOT want to write him off simply because he lacks prior HC experience. His biggest problem has been an unimaginative offense, but I would suspect if he stays that much of the offensive staff will be replaced.
-
chuck0609 said...
Attempting to compare Fickel to Tressel coming out of YSU shows a true lack of knowledge. Tressel had 17 YEARS of HEAD COACHING experience, had won MULTIPLE national Championships, and was on the short list for every BIG coaching vacancy in the country. The ONLY reason he stayed at YSU was he wanted the OSU job. It was his dream job. Fickel has ZERO experience until this year and has zero experience at any level. HE'S LEARNING ON THE JOB. I don't kniw baout you all, but OSU is not a place where you learn the ropes of being a coach. Its a premium job for a premium guy. I can't believe some of you want a unknown guy with no experience to run this program. Its unfathomable to me.
-
dabighurt08 said...
I know that Ohio State has had a lot of stuff going on over the last year. And people keep saying well if Luke does this or that. Bottom line is Ohio State has hands down the most TALENT in the Big Ten and it is not even close. That fact rarely comes up!
With that being said I am not bashing Luke, I like him I just do not think he is ready to be a big time football program head coach yet. If Urban wants to come to Columbus then I say we have no choice but to bring him in with open arms. I'd love for him to keep Luke on the staff!
-
OSUrox said...
most if not all of those coaches had experience at numerous schools under several different coaches to learn their craft. Stoops was at Iowa, KSU, FLA under Fry, Snyder and Spurrier. Yes, no HC experience, but learned for 16 yrs from a few of the best. Saban had 16 yrs of coaching at several different school before he became a HC----AT A MAC SCHOOL! But it's OK for Luke to learn under only 1 coach and get a HC at one of the top 5 schools on earth?
I also see a lot of OC and DC in your posts, our current interim coach does not even have that. he may have had a co-DC title, but Heacock has always been the DC.
Plus, this is OSU. I don't care who Houston, Clemson, WVU, Boise hired. Give me a break. We are OSU.
iowabuckeyes
- 5 stars Rating: 91
8260 votes total - (7214)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
iowabuckeyes said...
First, the statement that was made was that "no one starts at the top." It didn't allow for any exceptions. I refuted that statement. If your best response is to say you don't care about who Houston, Clemson, WVU and Boise hired, then you completely missed the point.
Secondly, I'm well aware this is OSU. I am more than familiar with our history of hiring coaches. The reality is we don't have that many options to choose from and Fickell's in the top 5. In fact, right now, his name is the only one on the list because it's his job to lose. It's not where you start but where you finish that counts. There's still a lot of football to be played before anyone writes this guy off. The more people do this assine whining of "This is OSU! He's got to be shipped off to coaching Siberia to earn his stripes in HC graveyards in places like Kent or Ypsilanti or Ames or Akron before he can be HC here," the more it makes me want to root for the guy.
Third, since you obviously need further education, let's go: JoePa only coached for Rip Engle at PSU...for 15 years. With the exception of one year as OC at East Carolina, Mark Richt only coached for Bobby Bowden at FSU. With the exception of one year as OC at that Cradle of Coaches, Austin College in Texas, Bill Snyder only coached for Hayden Fry, first at North Texas and then at Iowa. Frank Solich only coached for Tom Osborne, who only coached for Bob Devaney.
Conversely, in the 18 years before he became HC at TCU, Gary Patterson had 11 AC jobs, none for more than 3 years, six of them for no more than 1 season. How much do you really think he learned in the single seasons he spent at coaching juggernauts like UC Davis, Pittsburg State, Cal Lutheran, the Oregon Lightning Bolts (????) and Navy? They were nothing more than stepping stone jobs that eventually got him the DC job at TCU, which became the HC job. But to hear you say it, they mean more than Fickell's nine years coaching for Jim Tressel at OSU. At most of those stops Patterson probably had a P.O. Box for his mail because he wasn't there long enough to remember where he lived. I'm sure you'll dis his addition to my list but I'd bet you'd be happy to have at HC at OSU. Or are we only OK hiring HCs from Miami of Ohio, Iowa State and Youngstown State? And before you brag up Miami as the real Cradle of Coaches, name their last good coach--Randy Walker? Otherwise, Woody Hayes was a long, long, long time ago.
I don't care whether Fickell was DC or Co-DC. He's the HC now and he's Heacock's boss. He was the guy who stepped up and took it, not Heacock. That's what matters. That and it's his job to lose.
One last thing: I used the BCS Top 25 as my metric. It was the most logical standard if we're looking for CURRENT coaching excellence. You're using your head up your ass for yours. If you want me to go deeper into the list, just say the word. Just know that it means your head will only go deeper up your ass.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by boomboom on 11/1/2011 at 7:16 AM
-
OHIORULES said...
Fickell is an unknown guy. Has the school record for consecutive games started. Over 8 years coaching experience with OSU. A great recruiter for the defense and has great relationships with his players. If he is 11-3 with a Rose Bowl win then he did a damn good job LEARNING ON THE JOB.
This post was edited by chuck0609 on 11/1/2011 at 7:43 AM
-
buckeyeundrgrnd
- 5 stars Rating: 90
351 votes total - (429)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buckeyeundrgrnd
- 5 stars Rating: 90
351 votes total - (429)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buckeyeundrgrnd said...
Well, this thread is pointless because Fickell won't go 11-3. If by some chance we happen to win out the rest of our regular season games, which is doubtful, there is no way this current coaching staff will win the B1G Championship game and a BCS bowl game. Its just not happening. I mean seriously, did you guys not watch the Wisconsin game? That game was in the bag. We had a 12 point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and blew it. Braxton Miller won us that game, not Fickell's coaching. Fickell's coaching gave Wisconsin the lead with 1:18 to play. We witnessed the only gametime adjustment Fickell has made all year (having our D switch from what had shut Wisconsin down all night to a prevent/permit defense) blow a 12 point lead by giving up 15 points in 3 minutes of play. And, don't get me started on the win over Illinois. They were a paper tiger - totally overrated. They had not played anyone until they played us and we beat them with only one completion the whole game.
I love who Fickell is and what he has done. He is a great Buckeye, but just because he is a great Buckeye, doesn't make him ready to coach the Buckeyes at this point in time. Maybe one day he will be ready, but he isn't right now. I hope to high heaven that the BOT and Gene Smith have more sense and football smarts then all you people who think beating Illinois and Wisconsin makes Fickell the man for the job.
great2belucky
- 4 stars Rating: 67
5249 votes total - (4541)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
buckeyeundrgrnd said...
Well, this thread is pointless because Fickell won't go 11-3. If by some chance we happen to win out the rest of our regular season games, which is doubtful, there is no way this current coaching staff will win the B1G Championship game and a BCS bowl game. Its just not happening. I mean seriously, did you guys not watch the Wisconsin game? That game was in the bag. We had a 12 point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and blew it. Braxton Miller won us that game, not Fickell's coaching. Fickell's coaching gave Wisconsin the lead with 1:18 to play. We witnessed the only gametime adjustment Fickell has made all year (having our D switch from what had shut Wisconsin down all night to a prevent/permit defense) blow a 12 point lead by giving up 15 points in 3 minutes of play. And, don't get me started on the win over Illinois. They were a paper tiger - totally overrated. They had not played anyone until they played us and we beat them with only one completion the whole game.
I love who Fickell is and what he has done. He is a great Buckeye, but just because he is a great Buckeye, doesn't make him ready to coach the Buckeyes at this point in time. Maybe one day he will be ready, but he isn't right now. I hope to high heaven that the BOT and Gene Smith have more sense and football smarts then all you people who think beating Illinois and Wisconsin makes Fickell the man for the job.
This post was edited by miguelissimo on 11/1/2011 at 8:22 AM
"Buckeye born and bred, a Buckeye 'til I'm dead"
miguelissimo
- 5 stars Rating: 93
2106 votes total - (3594)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LuvtheBuckeyes
- 5 stars Rating: 84
211 votes total - (122)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ncgapp said...
So, breakdowns in defensive pass coverage are the coach's fault, but Braxton keeping his eyes upfield instead of solely looking to run was 100% Braxton and no coaching?
Seriously?
We won, let's enjoy that part. Whatever will be with the coaching at season's end will be. I think we will have a new HC next year. I do not necessarily think Luke is the next Joe Pa, or Saban. But I do think he's done an admirable job so far in difficult circumstances, and I hope we are starting to turn the corner and can finish the year well. If we do so, and LF is interviewed with a chance to get the full-time gig, then great.
great2belucky
- 4 stars Rating: 67
5249 votes total - (4541)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Kid Columbus said...
I've said this before in another thread and I'll say it again here. Regardless of what Fickell does the rest of the season, OSU needs to open up the coaching search, see who's interested and make the best decision from the available choices. If that turns out to be Fickell, I'm all in with him. But, they have to go through the process.
You don't make coaching decisions, or hiring decisions of any kind in ANY field, based on emotions. You don't hire Fickell after one emotional win over Wisconsin. Period. Or one emotional season, for that matter. Someone mentioned Dana Holgorsen at WV as evidence that hiring a coach with no HC experience can work. What they failed to mention is that Holgorsen took over for a guy, Bill Stewart, that was hired after one emotional Fiesta Bowl upset win over Oklahoma. By the way, who hasn't upset Oklahoma in a Fiesta Bowl, am I right? How did that Bill Stewart hire work out?
If Fickell can go 11-3 with wins in the B1G championship and Rose Bowl, it would go down as one of the greatest coaching achievements in Ohio State history. And I still wouldn't fault Gene Smith for bringing guys in for interviews. He has to see who wants the job first and make the best decision possible, whether that turns out to be Luke or someone else.
-
Kid Columbus said...
I've said this before in another thread and I'll say it again here. Regardless of what Fickell does the rest of the season, OSU needs to open up the coaching search, see who's interested and make the best decision from the available choices. If that turns out to be Fickell, I'm all in with him. But, they have to go through the process.
You don't make coaching decisions, or hiring decisions of any kind in ANY field, based on emotions. You don't hire Fickell after one emotional win over Wisconsin. Period. Or one emotional season, for that matter. Someone mentioned Dana Holgorsen at WV as evidence that hiring a coach with no HC experience can work. What they failed to mention is that Holgorsen took over for a guy, Bill Stewart, that was hired after one emotional Fiesta Bowl upset win over Oklahoma. By the way, who hasn't upset Oklahoma in a Fiesta Bowl, am I right? How did that Bill Stewart hire work out?
If Fickell can go 11-3 with wins in the B1G championship and Rose Bowl, it would go down as one of the greatest coaching achievements in Ohio State history. And I still wouldn't fault Gene Smith for bringing guys in for interviews. He has to see who wants the job first and make the best decision possible, whether that turns out to be Luke or someone else.
-
LuvtheBuckeyes said...
No. The hail mary was more a breakdown in WI coverage. ie, more a WI coaching gaff than any great OSU coaching. There was an article in a WI paper about the breakdown in coverage and a miscommunication. Luckily that happened so now Fickell can be the coach the next 10 yrs.
This post was edited by ncgapp on 11/1/2011 at 9:25 AM
-
buckeyeundrgrnd
- 5 stars Rating: 90
351 votes total - (429)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chuman said...
This is the reason I don't come on this site very often anymore. Let me say that I like Luke and what he has done for University. I still think Luke can be a terrific coach, but inexperience players, young players, blah blah blah. It's like watching a high school team out there. You people out there can keep your we won the game all you want. Yes we did. But why recruit QB's. Serious why????? Why not run the wishbone or triple option. Let's just line up 3 RBs and play smash mouth power run game all day long. This kills me to say, but I am torn this year. I want the Buckeyes to win- don't get me wrong, but watching this crappy offense for another year is turning me off. I watch all these other teams play and develop their QB, but not us. We have another running QB, that does just that- run. Each game we win, we are going to have these threads about keeping Luke. And that's what I am torn on. Do you really want this offense each and every year????? Really????? Winning out and getting killed in the bowl game by a good team will make you want to keep Luke. I have seen 10 + years of pathetic offenses, it's time to move on. I can't go another 5-8 years with Luke and crappy offenses. I just can't.
I guess I am turning into the "Hater" on this board. It sucks, but I am tired of lack of offense productivity. On the other note- our defense (besides that collapse in the 4th qrt) is pretty good.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5







You People Are Crazy