-
Urban_Meyer
- 4 stars Rating: 77
1601 votes total - 2 National Championships and counting... the Big Ten won't know what hit them.
- (1021)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SLVRBULLIT82 said...
I’m just curious as to why some people are so bent out of shape about fans wanting to get rid of dead weight or kids that won’t play. A poster on the FR listed some players that he thought should “get rid of” or have schollies rescinded ( McVey, Berry, TY, Fellows, Graham, Durham, Griffin, etc..). Why not? Arguably, for a coach and his staff to be successful, the coach needs to run his team like a CEO runs a company. If you put the best people for the job in the job then you have the best chance at succeeding. A HR manager won’t hire someone just so that they can sit around and do nothing when they could hire someone who actually has a positive effect on the team/company. I’m sure that we all love Archie but let’s be honest; his son doesn’t deserve a scholarship to TOSU based on merit/talent. The others listed above won’t play at all (that’s not even including some of the lower ranked recruits that Meyer told them that they didn’t “fit” his system.
I understand the argument about fairness and honoring scholarships, I do. If you were given a scholarship to play football but aren’t and won’t which side isn’t honoring their part of the deal? If you were given a scholarship to OSU that was for academics but continued to get a 2.1 gpa, I doubt that you’d remain on scholarship. I just wondered what other posters thought about this.
-
LvilleBuckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 89
663 votes total - (917)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SLVRBULLIT82 said...
I’m just curious as to why some people are so bent out of shape about fans wanting to get rid of dead weight or kids that won’t play. A poster on the FR listed some players that he thought should “get rid of” or have schollies rescinded ( McVey, Berry, TY, Fellows, Graham, Durham, Griffin, etc..). Why not? Arguably, for a coach and his staff to be successful, the coach needs to run his team like a CEO runs a company. If you put the best people for the job in the job then you have the best chance at succeeding. A HR manager won’t hire someone just so that they can sit around and do nothing when they could hire someone who actually has a positive effect on the team/company. I’m sure that we all love Archie but let’s be honest; his son doesn’t deserve a scholarship to TOSU based on merit/talent. The others listed above won’t play at all (that’s not even including some of the lower ranked recruits that Meyer told them that they didn’t “fit” his system.
I understand the argument about fairness and honoring scholarships, I do. If you were given a scholarship to play football but aren’t and won’t which side isn’t honoring their part of the deal? If you were given a scholarship to OSU that was for academics but continued to get a 2.1 gpa, I doubt that you’d remain on scholarship. I just wondered what other posters thought about this.
This post was edited by UpperBuck on 12/13/2011 at 12:21 PM
-
TimBucktoo said...
Two things are wrong with your reasoning. First, these recruits committed to tOSU while a dark cloud of uncertainty was hanging over the program. Dump them now in fair weather and the karma spirit will exact its revenge. If you're wondering from a CEO's perspective: coming from a business background, you never want to upset your suppliers. If Urban Meyer revokes the scholarship offers of so-called "deadweight" verbal commits, high school coaches will remember and Meyer's recruiting will become exponentially more difficult.
In sports, like in business, relationships are EVERYTHING. Meyer is a smart man so I'm sure he realizes this as well.
-
rmelroy said...
Each of the young men had a choice during the recruiting process the same as the coaching staff having a choice on who to offer the scholarships to. As long as a kid keeps a clean slate student wise I could never back a coach that cleans house of players that can't make the grade on the field. The most important trait a coach or any person can have is his word. The coaching staff has to do a good job of choosing who gets offered to avoid this situation. Let Alabama and LSU play that game. We can win the right way.
-
SpoonBuck said...
I agree with the OP. Don't confuse this with oversigning. Oversigning is signing more players on signing day than you know you have available. As long as you inform the player at the end of the season or by January that he has not met expectations then that gives that player the winter break and/or the spring to look for other schools to go to. It's when you yank out his feet in June and July and tell him to get outta here is when you have the oversigning issue.
And the OP was not referring to the current verbal commitment on the team. I agree that this is a special circumstance in which you can't turn them down now. Now if this was any normal coaching change, then Meyer would have full discretion to mix it up as he pleases. This happens ALL THE TIME when a new coach comes to town. It's not the school's recruits, it's his recruits. He's got a job to keep and excel at. No point using the old boss equipment and machinery if you can get your own, more functional equipment and resources.
The academic scholarship analogy fits perfectly here. If you don't perform, then your spot gets taken away from you. .
-
ssalumni said...
All I know some people talk out both sides of their mouth, cause they say these kids should be paid , look at all the money they bring into the univ. . Then the same people say we can't pull scollies just because they don't perform well . Is college football a business or not ? If its like a business then perform or you should be gone , just like any other business.
-
Turdtastic said...
Think about how many kids are on any D1 football roster. Many of them regardless of the program will never see real action. They could be great players but someone on the team might simply be better. That doesn't mean you pull their scholly. If we did that we are no different than the corrupt teams in the SEC that over-sign every year. If we expect the players to be loyal to the university we need to show loyalty to them.
-
iowabuckeyes
- 5 stars Rating: 91
7898 votes total - (6920)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
terryt3361 said...
Damn well said. We cannot start playing by the SEC model. If we in good faith offer a kid a scholly and he makes the grades and comes to practice and holds up his end of the bargain, than the scholly should stand. We cannot dump kids so we can have another place for a new one..........if we do......welcome to the SEC North. No thanks! Go Bucks!!
-
duccivespucci_2
- 5 stars Rating: 90
355 votes total - (399)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TimBucktoo said...
Two things are wrong with your reasoning. First, these recruits committed to tOSU while a dark cloud of uncertainty was hanging over the program. Dump them now in fair weather and the karma spirit will exact its revenge. If you're wondering from a CEO's perspective: coming from a business background, you never want to upset your suppliers. If Urban Meyer revokes the scholarship offers of so-called "deadweight" verbal commits, high school coaches will remember and Meyer's recruiting will become exponentially more difficult.
In sports, like in business, relationships are EVERYTHING. Meyer is a smart man so I'm sure he realizes this as well.
"Buckeye born and bred, a Buckeye 'til I'm dead"
miguelissimo
- 5 stars Rating: 93
2031 votes total - (3533)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
wholephoenix79
- 5 stars Rating: 85
398 votes total - (594)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ButlerBuck said...
If they go to class, get the grades, put forth effort on the field, and don't do anything too stupid, you keep them. We all make mistakes.
Remember several years ago when OSU pulled the offer from a receiver in Florida? We received plenty of bad publicity over that.
All scholarships are currently for a year at a time. The NCAA may be changing that in the near future.
-
wholephoenix79
- 5 stars Rating: 85
398 votes total - (594)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SLVRBULLIT82 said...
I’m just curious as to why some people are so bent out of shape about fans wanting to get rid of dead weight or kids that won’t play. A poster on the FR listed some players that he thought should “get rid of” or have schollies rescinded ( McVey, Berry, TY, Fellows, Graham, Durham, Griffin, etc..). Why not? Arguably, for a coach and his staff to be successful, the coach needs to run his team like a CEO runs a company. If you put the best people for the job in the job then you have the best chance at succeeding. A HR manager won’t hire someone just so that they can sit around and do nothing when they could hire someone who actually has a positive effect on the team/company. I’m sure that we all love Archie but let’s be honest; his son doesn’t deserve a scholarship to TOSU based on merit/talent. The others listed above won’t play at all (that’s not even including some of the lower ranked recruits that Meyer told them that they didn’t “fit” his system.
I understand the argument about fairness and honoring scholarships, I do. If you were given a scholarship to play football but aren’t and won’t which side isn’t honoring their part of the deal? If you were given a scholarship to OSU that was for academics but continued to get a 2.1 gpa, I doubt that you’d remain on scholarship. I just wondered what other posters thought about this.
-
buckibball4ever
- 4 stars Rating: 75
511 votes total - (762)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars







just curious about how you guys feel about this