Online Now 2375

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

On this Board 41
Record: 3169 (1/4/2013)

Online now 2368
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Here come all the reactionary fickle fans...

  • title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...

    Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.

    Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.

    Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.

    signature image

    SteveG

  • The most disappointing thing tonite was watching the same offense every time down the court- constant dribbling and worthless passing around the perimeter.
    This team just has pathetic outside shooting and no one to create.
    There is no player that could do what Burke did tonite- penetrate, jump, hang and score.
    If Buford is off this team just won't beat a good team.

    reality ron

  • Buford is pretty much a choke artist against good teams. I don't have faith in Buford scoring against a good team. People constantly bitched about Jon Diebler on this board last year but I will take a Jon Diebler over William Buford any day out of the year. Buford had four years to score points at OSU. Lucas, Redd, Turner, Jackson had three years. Buford's shot versus UW was a fluke and nothing else. I will be glad when he is gone from Ohio State.

    buckibball4ever

  • Buford is the best shooter that we have. The problem is that he is too streaky and inconsistent. Diebler was streaky too, but last year there were 3 others (Lighty, Thomas & Buford) to pick up the slack if he was having an off night. If Buford is off this season, Thomas is the only guy.

    I've said it all season that we need an outside shooter for offense off the bench. Matta just refuses to use the bench, so this just isn't going to happen.

    But one problem we had last year remains. We do not set the tempo or pace of any game vs. any decent opponent. We play whatever game our opponent dictates.

    JAG24

  • SteveG said...

    title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...

    Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.

    Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.

    Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.

    All good points but tell me please when as an osu basketball fan should I start to worry? when we lose in the round of 16 or sooner for the 4th straight year? I would like to think we will advance further than that I will be rooting for us to do so. However, we have not shown in the past few weeks any inkling of improving as a ball club. Are we regressing, I don't know....however, in a one and done environment once you've lost it's too late to be concerned isn't it?

    shep777

  • SteveG said...

    title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...

    Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.

    Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.

    Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.

    I hear your kind year after year from mostly young kiddies that are Indians fans,the team can do no wrong in thier eyes and anyone that dare bring out anything bad is labeled a whiner,non fan,turncoat,go root for someone else yada,yada,yada.Well I for one am tired of it and expect more and when I see laziness,no hustle,brain dead play,pathetic offense,a stupid coaching staff that does the same sloth like offense game after game and supposedly has an athletic team but doesn`t run,I will call them on it.You can sit back,lower the bar (which is the norm these days) and make excuses all you want but wake up,this team is vastly overrated and so is it`s coach.

    bukweat

  • I'm with you. Losing a tight game on the road against a ranked team.....who happens to be your rival that you've completely dominated for the past 3-4 years.....nothing to get worked up about. Buford is the only real question mark on this team.

    mgoblow

  • SteveG said...

    title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...

    Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.

    Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.

    Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.

    So only "fans" (in your opinion) blindly follow whomever is leading us to wherever -- even if it is over a cliff. Matta was outcoached yet again. As one poster noted, Matta takes whatever the other team gives us and plays to that style. Ohio State has no real identity.

    In Sully, Williams, and Thomas we have three unathletic, slow-footed players. Several times, Sully's man took him out on the perimeter then blew by him. Obviously, Matta needs him in the game but why not cover up his lack of defense by playing more zone? That way, we could also get Williams in the game and let him camp out in the paint to contest shots near the rim. As it stands now, once Craft, Buford, or Thomas are beat on the perimeter there is no one at the rim to stop them.

    TimBucktoo

  • TimBucktoo said...

    So only "fans" (in your opinion) blindly follow whomever is leading us to wherever -- even if it is over a cliff. Matta was outcoached yet again. As one poster noted, Matta takes whatever the other team gives us and plays to that style. Ohio State has no real identity.

    In Sully, Williams, and Thomas we have three unathletic, slow-footed players. Several times, Sully's man took him out on the perimeter then blew by him. Obviously, Matta needs him in the game but why not cover up his lack of defense by playing more zone? That way, we could also get Williams in the game and let him camp out in the paint to contest shots near the rim. As it stands now, once Craft, Buford, or Thomas are beat on the perimeter there is no one at the rim to stop them.

    The only answer is that Matta doesn't want to use a zone defense. He decided pre-season that they would be man-to-man the entire year, one style and no change of strategy regardless of circumstances. He apparently believes it's not worth trying.

    To add to your point, I've said all year long that we should be running some full court press, it would be a great way to utilize the bench. We've got the depth to substitute fresh legs to give any opponent at least a few minutes of hell. In my opinion, guys like Thompson, Ravenel, Scott, and Weatherspoon are built to press, fast and athletic guys who can bring energy to set the pace of a game or to change the tempo of a game that's not going our way.

    Matta's stubborness and refusal to try anything different or to use a guy like Ross for offense off the bench puts a cap on us.

    Maybe we will get lucky and make it to the final four or better. It's possible, but only if Buford or Thomas can catch fire for several games in a row and our opponents are off target. It's almost a roll of the dice at this point. I think it's unfortunate that we must rely so much on chance considering we will probably never have as much talent relative to the competition than we have right now. Of course, if you are burying the talent on the bench and have not developed it during the season, you have neutralized this as a potential advantage.

    This post was edited by JAG24 on 2/19/2012 at 8:57 AM

    JAG24

  • mgoblow said...

    I'm with you. Losing a tight game on the road against a ranked team.....who happens to be your rival that you've completely dominated for the past 3-4 years.....nothing to get worked up about. Buford is the only real question mark on this team.

    "Buford is the only question mark on the team"?Talk about clueless.They all have big question marks.
    Sully is very lazy at times,terrible help defense,is as slow as a truck,zero lateral movement,can`t jump,misses many bunnies,ect.
    Thomas horrible defense,not a good shooter,cannot create his own shot,is slow and unathletic,very lazy,whines all the time,blames teammates,ect.
    Craft can`t shoot
    Buford,talk about Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,mostly Hyde.He is the stereotype of a #3 player,he isn`t even a sidekick.
    Smith,another non shooter,decent D,good toughness and rebounder,not much offensive skill.
    The bench,who knows but I am amazed that anyone on this team was ranked very high coming out of HS because I surely don`t see it.
    This team also lacks a spine.

    bukweat

  • the team needs to get someone else under the basket to take some of the pressure off sullinger who is looking slower and slower as each game goes by. why is sullinger still following his man out past the top of the key then getting burned when the guy blows right by him to the basket? do any of these guys call out picks to their teammates?? some one needs to step up and hit open jumpers on the first or second pass to start opening up the middle.
    i have seen very few changes (if any) by matta to try to get this offense started again. as has been said all season, if you don't play your bench as much as you can in the early part of the season, by the late stages of the season when the starters are dead tired it will be too late to run in some body who can't play because his feet are asleep from sitting on the bench so much.
    either this is a very talented team not playing up to their potential and not being well coached, or maybe these guys aren't as good as we have been led to believe. i am beginning to wonder.

    bongturk

  • bukweat said...

    "Buford is the only question mark on the team"?Talk about clueless.They all have big question marks. Sully is very lazy at times,terrible help defense,is as slow as a truck,zero lateral movement,can`t jump,misses many bunnies,ect. Thomas horrible defense,not a good shooter,cannot create his own shot,is slow and unathletic,very lazy,whines all the time,blames teammates,ect. Craft can`t shoot Buford,talk about Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,mostly Hyde.He is the stereotype of a #3 player,he isn`t even a sidekick. Smith,another non shooter,decent D,good toughness and rebounder,not much offensive skill. The bench,who knows but I am amazed that anyone on this team was ranked very high coming out of HS because I surely don`t see it. This team also lacks a spine.

    The only thing Buford is thinking about is taking a bunch of shots so he can improve his chances in the NBA. After watching him this year, I bet he'll be lucky to get signed as a free agent. He's killing this team and just wait...he will be the sole reason when OSU loses in the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. He'll have another 2-13 shooting night and that'll be it. Too bad. This team has the potential to be much better if Matta would actually coach instead of just being a cheerleader.

    jaxfloridabuck

  • SteveG said...

    title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...

    Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.

    Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.

    Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.

    I think you are painting a very broad stroke with your comment........sure, some fans will go over the top and think everything is terrible and we can do nothing right, comparing Matta to Cooper (eh, i am not buying that just yet) but I think we have enough things going on with this team to be very concerned and to openly provide opinions on it.

    Sure, this was a tough game on the road....one we NEEDED to win and once again we were pretty much outplayed and the other team CLEARLY wanted it more than we did with their effort and team play.

    I am not saying we suck becuase we are clearly a very good team that is has been playing VERY poorly as of late which is not the right directly to be heading into latter part of the season and the NCAA tourney.

    We are getting outworked.....outcoached.....I am assuming you watched the game last night but take a look and really watch the body language of our team.....watch how they come off the court during timeouts etc. Guys are not encouraging each other....no one is picking each other up.....not even during the game!!!!

    Bottom line is this team has lost confidence in themselves and need to find a way to get it back. When we solely depend on a perimeter shooting game from two guys that are STREAKY that is not good.....couple that with teams now can easily defend us out of a zone by putting light pressure on the perimeter and shading down on Sully.

    Sully is hanging on to the ball too long in the post and allowing the defenders to get to him before finding the open man.......we have zero penetration from the perimeter. You can't tell me that scUM is one of the best defenses in the country......they flat out wanted it more than we did and it showed last night. Same as it did against sparty.

    If they continue to play this way we will lose another 2-3 games in conference. I think we will bounce back against Illinois but going to Northwestern, Wisky at home, THEN away at SParty has at least 2 losses written all over it unless they can somehow pull together and find some confidence and team continuity.

    Championship teams win on the road.......they typically start playing their best the last 1/3 of the season......and they players that step up and get it done when things get tough, home or away AND consistently. This team is going in the opposite direction......if you cannot see that from the last several games then you must be watching a different team.

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    bcroft

  • bukweat said...

    "Buford is the only question mark on the team"?Talk about clueless.They all have big question marks. Sully is very lazy at times,terrible help defense,is as slow as a truck,zero lateral movement,can`t jump,misses many bunnies,ect. Thomas horrible defense,not a good shooter,cannot create his own shot,is slow and unathletic,very lazy,whines all the time,blames teammates,ect. Craft can`t shoot Buford,talk about Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,mostly Hyde.He is the stereotype of a #3 player,he isn`t even a sidekick. Smith,another non shooter,decent D,good toughness and rebounder,not much offensive skill. The bench,who knows but I am amazed that anyone on this team was ranked very high coming out of HS because I surely don`t see it. This team also lacks a spine.

    Have you been paying attention this season? When (if) Buford shoots well, they can beat anyone. When he's off, they struggle. You want five perfect players. You're not going to find that anywhere.

    mgoblow

  • exactly - when this team is clicking, we blow Michigan out at home - no issues, everyone loves the team, loves the coach. When Buford lights up Minnesota, clutch play, shows senior leadership and get 26 or whatever it was, no one is concerned, we love it.

    That is what I'm talking about - outside of the Michigan State game, we win all our home games - and we've played Purdue, who had some guy go crazy on us - we lose to Indiana in a crowd that was incredible coming off a team that beat Kentucky at home, then we goto a Michigan team on the road that practically has the same win-lose and is a very good team - we want to fire our coach. We want to play our 12th guy on the bench with some illusion that he will come in just 'fix everything'.

    This is the team we have. Matta has recruited talented 5 star recruits - guys that play under him are in the NBA - you can't say he can't coach - I've been watching this team, every game, every minute for many many many years - we've had a shot at a NC, we've had a NIT win (yes, I watched all those as well).

    This is the team we have - when we played zone, we didn't have athletes we have today. We had issues with zone, this team rebounds well - it was a key component to beating Michigan, zone doesn't help in that at all. Just saying there are many variables, I personally prefer man to man if you have the talent. Yes, Thomas is a weaker link, but as a coach, you have a guy that knows how to score on a team that struggles to score, you have to continue with it.

    But what I'm talking about here is the people that want to 'fire Matta' or whatever after a close game in a tough environment, refs weren't helping, etc... the same team that DESTROYED Michigan in the second half at home - the same team that DESTROYED Duke at home. But we lose a game by 2 and the world is ending. Is that being against constructive criticism - no. Do I just have rose colored glasses.. no - I said - we had issues, this team plays poorly on the road. Our big lose, only lose, at home was against a good team, which Craft said they played selfishly, and Sullinger was obviously getting pounded - (or course when we lose we get a video showing him flopping... hello people, this is a physical conference).

    We have talent. We have matchup issues - we have a 6'9 guy playing the 5 spot show should be playing the 4 spot. We have a great defensive guard who struggles to hit a jump shot when his man double downs on the post player. We have a senior who is a great shooter, great stroke, but is streaky - he always has been - and trying to make him a great drive the lane guy isn't going to 'just happen'. We have a very young team of guys trying to show they can play - great highlights in a guy like Thompson - but who are not quite ready to really grab the bull by the horns.

    If anything, Matta has his work cut out for him - and his focus on defense is very wise - it sets the foundation to show Williams, etc... that playing good 'D' is where it starts.

    It's not all perfect, this isn't the land of Oz, but for crying out loud - enough with the attacks on the players - these guys are playing their hearts out and in a very very tough part of the schedule, we still have Michigan St on the road, and man oh man, do I want to see us beat them :)

    signature image

    SteveG

  • Upvote for you, SteveG.

    You said it well. The sky is not falling. Ohio State hasn't lost to Toledo, or at home to Penn State, or anything like that. They have lost to very good teams, or teams that have played very well on a certain night. That happens sometimes. And, sometimes the ball just doesn't fall for you.

    Anybody remember who won the national championship last season? Anybody remember who the Final Four teams were? This season is not over just because of a few conference losses to some very good teams.

    I've said my piece on some other threads about my concerns - the pace of the offense has grown slower and slower, and the shot selection/decision making has been atrocious at times lately. HOWEVER, this team has talent, and things could very well open up in the tournament for this offense when they get out of the B1G.

    RonnyD

  • SteveG said...

    exactly - when this team is clicking, we blow Michigan out at home - no issues, everyone loves the team, loves the coach. When Buford lights up Minnesota, clutch play, shows senior leadership and get 26 or whatever it was, no one is concerned, we love it.

    That is what I'm talking about - outside of the Michigan State game, we win all our home games - and we've played Purdue, who had some guy go crazy on us - we lose to Indiana in a crowd that was incredible coming off a team that beat Kentucky at home, then we goto a Michigan team on the road that practically has the same win-lose and is a very good team - we want to fire our coach. We want to play our 12th guy on the bench with some illusion that he will come in just 'fix everything'.

    This is the team we have. Matta has recruited talented 5 star recruits - guys that play under him are in the NBA - you can't say he can't coach - I've been watching this team, every game, every minute for many many many years - we've had a shot at a NC, we've had a NIT win (yes, I watched all those as well).

    This is the team we have - when we played zone, we didn't have athletes we have today. We had issues with zone, this team rebounds well - it was a key component to beating Michigan, zone doesn't help in that at all. Just saying there are many variables, I personally prefer man to man if you have the talent. Yes, Thomas is a weaker link, but as a coach, you have a guy that knows how to score on a team that struggles to score, you have to continue with it.

    But what I'm talking about here is the people that want to 'fire Matta' or whatever after a close game in a tough environment, refs weren't helping, etc... the same team that DESTROYED Michigan in the second half at home - the same team that DESTROYED Duke at home. But we lose a game by 2 and the world is ending. Is that being against constructive criticism - no. Do I just have rose colored glasses.. no - I said - we had issues, this team plays poorly on the road. Our big lose, only lose, at home was against a good team, which Craft said they played selfishly, and Sullinger was obviously getting pounded - (or course when we lose we get a video showing him flopping... hello people, this is a physical conference).

    We have talent. We have matchup issues - we have a 6'9 guy playing the 5 spot show should be playing the 4 spot. We have a great defensive guard who struggles to hit a jump shot when his man double downs on the post player. We have a senior who is a great shooter, great stroke, but is streaky - he always has been - and trying to make him a great drive the lane guy isn't going to 'just happen'. We have a very young team of guys trying to show they can play - great highlights in a guy like Thompson - but who are not quite ready to really grab the bull by the horns.

    If anything, Matta has his work cut out for him - and his focus on defense is very wise - it sets the foundation to show Williams, etc... that playing good 'D' is where it starts.

    It's not all perfect, this isn't the land of Oz, but for crying out loud - enough with the attacks on the players - these guys are playing their hearts out and in a very very tough part of the schedule, we still have Michigan St on the road, and man oh man, do I want to see us beat them :)

    While most of your points are good , you are not seeing the most important thing.
    This team is just NOT that talented.
    They have 8 players that can't shoot the basketball.
    Regardless of how high you can jump(Thompson), how hard you play (Smith) , how good a ball handler (Craft), how good you can dunk (Weatherspoon), how tall you are(Williams)-the single most important thing in basketball is shooting.
    These guys can't shoot and score.How can one team have so many putrid shooters?
    When is the last time Shannon Scott actually made a basket?
    I think he is like 1 for his last 15.He is horrible.
    He couldn't make 2 foul shots the another night.

    On top of that the chemistry and body language of the players-particulary Sullinger has been negative. One of the writers commented he thinks Sullinger realizes this team has no shot to make the Final 4 so he is justplaying out season waiting for theNBA.

    reality ron

  • The fickle fans now are going to be the same ones proclaiming Matta and Co. 'Kings of the World' if they make a good tourney run. Or they will call for Matta's head if he does anything but win every game by 20 and win a NT.

    I think it comes down to 1) Lack of Leadership on the court and 2) This is a very young team and it needs to learn how to win tough games (which has a lot to do with #1).

    I think we forget all to often this season, that they had Lighty, Diebler and Lauderdale as seniors last year. You can not replace 'leaders' and that is what this team is struggling with. Plain and simple.

    whvball

  • reality ron said...

    While most of your points are good , you are not seeing the most important thing. This team is just NOT that talented. They have 8 players that can't shoot the basketball. Regardless of how high you can jump(Thompson), how hard you play (Smith) , how good a ball handler (Craft), how good you can dunk (Weatherspoon), how tall you are(Williams)-the single most important thing in basketball is shooting. These guys can't shoot and score.How can one team have so many putrid shooters? When is the last time Shannon Scott actually made a basket? I think he is like 1 for his last 15.He is horrible. He couldn't make 2 foul shots the another night.

    On top of that the chemistry and body language of the players-particulary Sullinger has been negative. One of the writers commented he thinks Sullinger realizes this team has no shot to make the Final 4 so he is justplaying out season waiting for theNBA.

    ron, this is spot on. No reasonable person would ever ask for Matta's head. However, this team is over-valued by many. We have too many players that lack the most important offense skill in the game, which is putting the ball in the basket! We have 2 guys that can shoot the ball reasonably well and both (Buford and Thomas) are as streaky as you can get shooting the basketball. Craft, Smith, Spoon, Scott, Thompson, Siebert, etc cannot shoot the ball. Hell, sometimes I think Sully's our best outside shooter. Outside of Sully we are a jump-shooting team that can't make jump shots. Can we get hot at the right time? Certainly and as a fan I will be rooting hard for this to happen. But we are 27 games into the season and I think now is the time to get going. The close loss to Michigan was just not another loss...we fell out of a first place tie, lost control of our destiny and are now barely hanging on to a 2 seed. 5 losses is not terrible but the game against Michigan had a lot riding on it as did the game against Sparty and we dropped both. Any reasonable fan should be at least mildly concerned about where this team is heading right now.

    shep777

  • I don't really disagree to that Ron - I don't think though that at a certain point when one discusses talent, one must also discuss team chemistry.

    When Duke came to Ohio - they have talent. But talent itself doesn't win the game. Austin is a great player no doubt, but often times it was him trying to do it all.

    Our team is very much like that as well. It's a team game, when the team clicks it clicks well. Everyone chipping in and executing their role.

    When Craft says they played selfishly vs. Mich St, that had me more concerned than any of the talent. We are young, and college basketball has much parity in it these days - so I'm not surprised to see this happen

    signature image

    SteveG

  • mgoblow said...

    Have you been paying attention this season? When (if) Buford shoots well, they can beat anyone. When he's off, they struggle. You want five perfect players. You're not going to find that anywhere.

    Perfect?There is no such thing and I surely didn`t say anything about perfect.Now if you read that into my discription of the players faults,IMO of course,then that is on you.

    I deffinately beg to differ with you about when he shoots well we beat anybody.If that were true,how pathetic is the rest of the team then?I just saw some stats that he averages something like 18 points a game against the bottom 8 teams and 8 against the top 4 so that kind of blows your sad logic right out of the water,laddy.

    No,I usually day dream and stare at the tv while they are playing.

    bukweat

  • bukweat said...

    Perfect?There is no such thing and I surely didn`t say anything about perfect.Now if you read that into my discription of the players faults,IMO of course,then that is on you.

    I deffinately beg to differ with you about when he shoots well we beat anybody.If that were true,how pathetic is the rest of the team then?I just saw some stats that he averages something like 18 points a game against the bottom 8 teams and 8 against the top 4 so that kind of blows your sad logic right out of the water,laddy.

    No,I usually day dream and stare at the tv while they are playing.

    +1.....just saw the same stat. Your best players should perform just as well if not better against the best competition. Clearly Buford struggles againts the top tier teams in the league....as well as any top tier team outside of the conference.

    The problem is our perimter threats are streaky at best...with DT being the "most" consistent of the two and THAT is not going to get it done. Outside of that you have nothing....Craft doesn't look to score and LSJ had that one really good game from the perimeter, otherwise he is horrible from behind the arc. Couple that with the fact we have ZERO bench scoring or support......

    The only way we win the B1G or go ANYWHERE in the NCAA tourney is if DT and Buford can start shooting the ball well enough to cause defenses to play us differently than we do now and if that happens that will open it up for Sully.

    That is how this team was so good last year....teams could not play zones and they could not play off of our shooters and cheat down on Sully. That led to giving Craft WAY more opportunities to drive the ball and dish to Sully/Diebs/Lighty/Buford.

    This team is a hot mess right now.

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    bcroft