-
buckibball4ever
- 4 stars Rating: 75
511 votes total - (762)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SteveG said...
title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...
Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.
Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.
Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.
-
SteveG said...
title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...
Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.
Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.
Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.
-
SteveG said...
title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...
Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.
Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.
Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.
-
TimBucktoo said...
So only "fans" (in your opinion) blindly follow whomever is leading us to wherever -- even if it is over a cliff. Matta was outcoached yet again. As one poster noted, Matta takes whatever the other team gives us and plays to that style. Ohio State has no real identity.
In Sully, Williams, and Thomas we have three unathletic, slow-footed players. Several times, Sully's man took him out on the perimeter then blew by him. Obviously, Matta needs him in the game but why not cover up his lack of defense by playing more zone? That way, we could also get Williams in the game and let him camp out in the paint to contest shots near the rim. As it stands now, once Craft, Buford, or Thomas are beat on the perimeter there is no one at the rim to stop them.
This post was edited by JAG24 on 2/19/2012 at 8:57 AM
-
bukweat said...
"Buford is the only question mark on the team"?Talk about clueless.They all have big question marks. Sully is very lazy at times,terrible help defense,is as slow as a truck,zero lateral movement,can`t jump,misses many bunnies,ect. Thomas horrible defense,not a good shooter,cannot create his own shot,is slow and unathletic,very lazy,whines all the time,blames teammates,ect. Craft can`t shoot Buford,talk about Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,mostly Hyde.He is the stereotype of a #3 player,he isn`t even a sidekick. Smith,another non shooter,decent D,good toughness and rebounder,not much offensive skill. The bench,who knows but I am amazed that anyone on this team was ranked very high coming out of HS because I surely don`t see it. This team also lacks a spine.
jaxfloridabuck
- 4 stars Rating: 78
51 votes total - (182)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SteveG said...
title says it all - let's allow the ... I'd say fans, but that would imply too much...
Get it all out, how we suck, how bad Matta is, how the bench is so great our starters are so bad.
Me: tough game, really struggling to make shots on the road this year , Thomas was clutch - Sully came on late. Announcers were on the floor saying it was physical.
Seems we have had the same refs over the last 3 games, allowing the same type play.
-
bukweat said...
"Buford is the only question mark on the team"?Talk about clueless.They all have big question marks. Sully is very lazy at times,terrible help defense,is as slow as a truck,zero lateral movement,can`t jump,misses many bunnies,ect. Thomas horrible defense,not a good shooter,cannot create his own shot,is slow and unathletic,very lazy,whines all the time,blames teammates,ect. Craft can`t shoot Buford,talk about Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,mostly Hyde.He is the stereotype of a #3 player,he isn`t even a sidekick. Smith,another non shooter,decent D,good toughness and rebounder,not much offensive skill. The bench,who knows but I am amazed that anyone on this team was ranked very high coming out of HS because I surely don`t see it. This team also lacks a spine.
-
SteveG said...
exactly - when this team is clicking, we blow Michigan out at home - no issues, everyone loves the team, loves the coach. When Buford lights up Minnesota, clutch play, shows senior leadership and get 26 or whatever it was, no one is concerned, we love it.
That is what I'm talking about - outside of the Michigan State game, we win all our home games - and we've played Purdue, who had some guy go crazy on us - we lose to Indiana in a crowd that was incredible coming off a team that beat Kentucky at home, then we goto a Michigan team on the road that practically has the same win-lose and is a very good team - we want to fire our coach. We want to play our 12th guy on the bench with some illusion that he will come in just 'fix everything'.
This is the team we have. Matta has recruited talented 5 star recruits - guys that play under him are in the NBA - you can't say he can't coach - I've been watching this team, every game, every minute for many many many years - we've had a shot at a NC, we've had a NIT win (yes, I watched all those as well).
This is the team we have - when we played zone, we didn't have athletes we have today. We had issues with zone, this team rebounds well - it was a key component to beating Michigan, zone doesn't help in that at all. Just saying there are many variables, I personally prefer man to man if you have the talent. Yes, Thomas is a weaker link, but as a coach, you have a guy that knows how to score on a team that struggles to score, you have to continue with it.
But what I'm talking about here is the people that want to 'fire Matta' or whatever after a close game in a tough environment, refs weren't helping, etc... the same team that DESTROYED Michigan in the second half at home - the same team that DESTROYED Duke at home. But we lose a game by 2 and the world is ending. Is that being against constructive criticism - no. Do I just have rose colored glasses.. no - I said - we had issues, this team plays poorly on the road. Our big lose, only lose, at home was against a good team, which Craft said they played selfishly, and Sullinger was obviously getting pounded - (or course when we lose we get a video showing him flopping... hello people, this is a physical conference).
We have talent. We have matchup issues - we have a 6'9 guy playing the 5 spot show should be playing the 4 spot. We have a great defensive guard who struggles to hit a jump shot when his man double downs on the post player. We have a senior who is a great shooter, great stroke, but is streaky - he always has been - and trying to make him a great drive the lane guy isn't going to 'just happen'. We have a very young team of guys trying to show they can play - great highlights in a guy like Thompson - but who are not quite ready to really grab the bull by the horns.
If anything, Matta has his work cut out for him - and his focus on defense is very wise - it sets the foundation to show Williams, etc... that playing good 'D' is where it starts.
It's not all perfect, this isn't the land of Oz, but for crying out loud - enough with the attacks on the players - these guys are playing their hearts out and in a very very tough part of the schedule, we still have Michigan St on the road, and man oh man, do I want to see us beat them :)
-
reality ron said...
While most of your points are good , you are not seeing the most important thing. This team is just NOT that talented. They have 8 players that can't shoot the basketball. Regardless of how high you can jump(Thompson), how hard you play (Smith) , how good a ball handler (Craft), how good you can dunk (Weatherspoon), how tall you are(Williams)-the single most important thing in basketball is shooting. These guys can't shoot and score.How can one team have so many putrid shooters? When is the last time Shannon Scott actually made a basket? I think he is like 1 for his last 15.He is horrible. He couldn't make 2 foul shots the another night.
On top of that the chemistry and body language of the players-particulary Sullinger has been negative. One of the writers commented he thinks Sullinger realizes this team has no shot to make the Final 4 so he is justplaying out season waiting for theNBA.
-
bukweat said...
Perfect?There is no such thing and I surely didn`t say anything about perfect.Now if you read that into my discription of the players faults,IMO of course,then that is on you.
I deffinately beg to differ with you about when he shoots well we beat anybody.If that were true,how pathetic is the rest of the team then?I just saw some stats that he averages something like 18 points a game against the bottom 8 teams and 8 against the top 4 so that kind of blows your sad logic right out of the water,laddy.
No,I usually day dream and stare at the tv while they are playing.




Here come all the reactionary fickle fans...