-
osubuckeye43 said...
There's a lot of criticism about the past month and a half or so of OSU's basketball season, and some of it may hold water. However, the tournament field is extremely weak this season, with only a few elite teams out there (UK, Syracuse, etc). Thus, we should be able to make a deep run with some momentum from the last few games and the Big Ten Tournament. Since this isn't a video game and we can't "play the bench more", I'd like to hear some ideas on what OSU can do with the current rotations that Thad Matta employs. Here are some thoughts I have....
The starting five is fairly effective-Craft, Smith, Buford, Thomas & Sullinger. Buford, Thomas, and Sullinger are threats from anywhere on the court, however, they haven't figured out how to move when Sullinger gets the ball in the post. I'm surprised we never try the pick and roll with Craft or Buford and Sullinger, while playing Thomas in the post. Sure, Thomas can get hot from three, but he's an extremely talented post player that rarely gets plays called for him inside. If we were to move Sullinger's man out (he would have to respect the pick and pop jumpshot for Sullinger), it would open the paint for Thomas, who's been our best option on offense the past month and a half.
When Buford or Smith get in foul trouble, our production drops significantly. The rotation that Matta has employed recently to spell Sullinger and Buford/Smith is Scott, Craft, Thompson, Thomas, and Ravenel. The notion that Thompson and Scott will somehow magically become 3 pt shooters is a fallacy-they need an entire summer to work and improve on it, it's not something that you use game experience to learn. With Craft's improved shooting it's OK to put him at the 2-guard, but Thompson is nothing more than a supremely athletic player. I think with this line-up you still ride Thomas, whether he's the pick and roll man or posting down low, he needs touches. Scott and Thompson have no jumpshot, and Ravenel can rebound. Thus, I think Scott needs to use his quickness as the primary ballhandler, with Thompson roaming for putbacks.
***Again, saying that "Ross or Williams need more PT" is not an acceptable suggestion. Ross has practiced maybe a month and a half with the team, and Williams is an extremely raw post player. However, I'd like to know what happened with Sibert. Although streaky, I've actually witnessed him make a few three pt shots (can't say that for Scott or Thompson), and he has the athleticism to play effective defense.
So what's our best plan of attack with our young bench? The Craft/Scott tandem is interesting, with a Princeton style attack from both sides with two primary ball handlers, but no outside threats. Maybe we go small with Scott/Craft/Buford/Thompson/Sullinger? Would like to hear your guy's thoughts, looking at a mock bracket OSU seems to be the most talented team for the first few rounds.....
buckibball4ever
- 4 stars Rating: 75
511 votes total - (762)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MannekenPis ●
- 4 stars Rating: 76
3613 votes total - (2543)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
great2belucky ●
- 4 stars Rating: 67
5259 votes total - (4546)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
osubuckeye43 said...
There's a lot of criticism about the past month and a half or so of OSU's basketball season, and some of it may hold water. However, the tournament field is extremely weak this season, with only a few elite teams out there (UK, Syracuse, etc). Thus, we should be able to make a deep run with some momentum from the last few games and the Big Ten Tournament. Since this isn't a video game and we can't "play the bench more", I'd like to hear some ideas on what OSU can do with the current rotations that Thad Matta employs. Here are some thoughts I have....
The starting five is fairly effective-Craft, Smith, Buford, Thomas & Sullinger. Buford, Thomas, and Sullinger are threats from anywhere on the court, however, they haven't figured out how to move when Sullinger gets the ball in the post. I'm surprised we never try the pick and roll with Craft or Buford and Sullinger, while playing Thomas in the post. Sure, Thomas can get hot from three, but he's an extremely talented post player that rarely gets plays called for him inside. If we were to move Sullinger's man out (he would have to respect the pick and pop jumpshot for Sullinger), it would open the paint for Thomas, who's been our best option on offense the past month and a half.
When Buford or Smith get in foul trouble, our production drops significantly. The rotation that Matta has employed recently to spell Sullinger and Buford/Smith is Scott, Craft, Thompson, Thomas, and Ravenel. The notion that Thompson and Scott will somehow magically become 3 pt shooters is a fallacy-they need an entire summer to work and improve on it, it's not something that you use game experience to learn. With Craft's improved shooting it's OK to put him at the 2-guard, but Thompson is nothing more than a supremely athletic player. I think with this line-up you still ride Thomas, whether he's the pick and roll man or posting down low, he needs touches. Scott and Thompson have no jumpshot, and Ravenel can rebound. Thus, I think Scott needs to use his quickness as the primary ballhandler, with Thompson roaming for putbacks.
***Again, saying that "Ross or Williams need more PT" is not an acceptable suggestion. Ross has practiced maybe a month and a half with the team, and Williams is an extremely raw post player. However, I'd like to know what happened with Sibert. Although streaky, I've actually witnessed him make a few three pt shots (can't say that for Scott or Thompson), and he has the athleticism to play effective defense.
So what's our best plan of attack with our young bench? The Craft/Scott tandem is interesting, with a Princeton style attack from both sides with two primary ball handlers, but no outside threats. Maybe we go small with Scott/Craft/Buford/Thompson/Sullinger? Would like to hear your guy's thoughts, looking at a mock bracket OSU seems to be the most talented team for the first few rounds.....
This post was edited by JAG24 on 3/3/2012 at 9:05 AM
-
FredFlintsone
- 3 stars Rating: 47
1012 votes total - (946)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
djjonesy
- 4 stars Rating: 68
117 votes total - doug jones
- (142)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars











What we can do to WIN with this team