Online Now 4021

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

On this Board 238
Record: 9642 (12/28/2012)

Online now 3273
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Anti Gun Liberals

  • They are living by their words! Watch this: http://youtu.be/wt1Zy_ASNyA

    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • Hypocrites as usual.

    NUTTYBAR

  • Not as strong in their convictions as they act. Shocker.

    This post was edited by rootstownbuck on 1/18/2013 at 10:55 AM

    rootstownbuck

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    dave1954

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    Schaefnuts70426

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now
    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    bvdickerson

  • These people are exactly why in-breeding isn't allowed. The perfect example

    THEnutbuster

  • These are the same POS that want the government to do everything for them. Then blame the police because they didn't get there in time when a disaster h happens.

    TRASHY TRASHY PEOPLE

    THEnutbuster

  • Anti-gun liberals are the worst.

    Anti-gun anarchists is where it's at.

    signature image

    devidee ●

  • devidee said...

    Anti-gun liberals are the worst.

    Anti-gun anarchists is where it's at.

    I'm all for being "anti-gun" as long as that means NOBODY gets to have them... including the police and the military.

    Schaefnuts70426

  • THEnutbuster said...

    These are the same POS that want the government to do everything for them. Then blame the police because they didn't get there in time when a disaster h happens.

    TRASHY TRASHY PEOPLE

    Isn't it funny that the neighborhoods that are filled with people receiving gov't handouts are also the ones with the majority of the gun violence? Cause and effect, anyone?

    Schaefnuts70426

  • Schaefnuts70426 said...

    I'm all for being "anti-gun" as long as that means NOBODY gets to have them... including the police and the military.

    Yea, but shooting is fun so lets not give up our guns.

    rootstownbuck

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    dave1954

  • rootstownbuck said...

    Yea, but shooting is fun so lets not give up our guns.

    Agreed. Guns for everyone! Even libs! We will force them to own guns or leave the country!

    Schaefnuts70426

  • Publishing the names/addresses of all registered gun owners is not the same as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of gun owners saying "There are guns here."

    Likewise, publishing the names/addresses of non-gun owners is not the same thing as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of non-gun owners saying "There are no guns here."

    This is a false equivalence, and someone who supports some form of gun laws or publishing the names of registered owners is not a hypocrite for not wanting to put a sign in their front yard. It's a funny video but let's be real. This is a whole bunch of nothing.

    Where I grew up near Cleveland every new home purchase was published with the name and address of the buyer. Public records are public records. Publishing public records is as American as it gets. If someone buys or registers a gun, and it's public record, legal to publish, and may be of interest to people in the neighborhood, then the publisher should feel free to publish the information if he so chooses.

    I thought this was America?

    thrillerbuck

  • thrillerbuck said...

    Publishing the names/addresses of all registered gun owners is not the same as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of gun owners saying "There are guns here."

    Likewise, publishing the names/addresses of non-gun owners is not the same thing as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of non-gun owners saying "There are no guns here."

    This is a false equivalence, and someone who supports some form of gun laws or publishing the names of registered owners is not a hypocrite for not wanting to put a sign in their front yard. It's a funny video but let's be real. This is a whole bunch of nothing.

    Where I grew up near Cleveland every new home purchase was published with the name and address of the buyer. Public records are public records. Publishing public records is as American as it gets. If someone buys or registers a gun, and it's public record, legal to publish, and may be of interest to people in the neighborhood, then the publisher should feel free to publish the information if he so chooses.

    I thought this was America?

    What's your full name?
    What's your address?
    What's your social security number?
    What's your date of birth?
    How much money do you make?

    Surely you won't mind telling all of us this info.

    Schaefnuts70426

  • Schaefnuts70426 said...

    What's your full name? What's your address? What's your social security number? What's your date of birth? How much money do you make?

    Surely you won't mind telling all of us this info.

    This information is irrelevant and you are engaging in another tactic of false equivalence. If I was a registered gun owner and you were looking to publish the names and addresses of registered gun owners in my area, then my name and address would appear on that list. That's fine with me.

    thrillerbuck

  • thrillerbuck said...

    This information is irrelevant and you are engaging in another tactic of false equivalence. If I was a registered gun owner and you were looking to publish the names and addresses of registered gun owners in my area, then my name and address would appear on that list. That's fine with me.

    You thought this was America? That's exactly what I was thinking. You are your false equivalences... gimme a break.

    Please forgive me for making another equivalence, but why not have a list of names and addresses of people who have shopped at WalMart in the past year? Why isn't that public record? I know a lot of people who think that WalMart shoppers are ruining small business in this country. So why don't we call those people out and publish their names and addresses?

    You libs love your anonymity on message boards, but you want to call out gun owners because you don't like what they stand for. Then you hide behind so-called noble causes and so-called justified means.

    Ask Barack Obama and Eric Holder how they feel about "freedom of information". They're all about it until someone wants to use the FOIA to uncover the documents behind Fast and Furious.

    Schaefnuts70426

  • Schaefnuts70426 said...

    Agreed. Guns for everyone! Even libs! We will force them to own guns or leave the country!

    Now that is a great idea. I noticed many of the libs are getting their fanatical legislation killed in committees so far. Keep it up cons!

    rootstownbuck

  • thrillerbuck said...

    Publishing the names/addresses of all registered gun owners is not the same as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of gun owners saying "There are guns here."

    Likewise, publishing the names/addresses of non-gun owners is not the same thing as putting a tangible sign in the front yard of non-gun owners saying "There are no guns here."

    This is a false equivalence, and someone who supports some form of gun laws or publishing the names of registered owners is not a hypocrite for not wanting to put a sign in their front yard. It's a funny video but let's be real. This is a whole bunch of nothing.

    Where I grew up near Cleveland every new home purchase was published with the name and address of the buyer. Public records are public records. Publishing public records is as American as it gets. If someone buys or registers a gun, and it's public record, legal to publish, and may be of interest to people in the neighborhood, then the publisher should feel free to publish the information if he so chooses.

    I thought this was America?

    How funny is it that they went and got armed guards after trying to put lawful gun owners in danger, therefore having their addresses published in return? Their act was irresponsible and hateful. For you to believe otherwise is to have your head in the clouds. I am not arguing the legality of it, but it was a spiteful ignorant thing to do.

    This post was edited by rootstownbuck on 1/18/2013 at 5:13 PM

    rootstownbuck

  • Schaefnuts70426 said...

    You thought this was America? That's exactly what I was thinking. You are your false equivalences... gimme a break.

    Please forgive me for making another equivalence, but why not have a list of names and addresses of people who have shopped at WalMart in the past year? Why isn't that public record? I know a lot of people who think that WalMart shoppers are ruining small business in this country. So why don't we call those people out and publish their names and addresses?

    You libs love your anonymity on message boards, but you want to call out gun owners because you don't like what they stand for. Then you hide behind so-called noble causes and so-called justified means.

    Ask Barack Obama and Eric Holder how they feel about "freedom of information". They're all about it until someone wants to use the FOIA to uncover the documents behind Fast and Furious.

    Nice rant. Really nice.

    The act of shopping is not the same as owning something tangible. Moreover, shopping at Wal-Mart does not require one to register anything with the government, so it is not public record and not attainable from the government. I suppose if they bought at gun at Wal-Mart they'd need to register it. Does the place of purchase become part of the record? Maybe you could publish a list of all people who bought guns at Wal-Mart. That would be ironic.

    I have many friends who are gun owners. I may one day be one. While I may not understand why some people get so excited about guns, I don't dislike gun owners. I am only pointing the the ass-backwards logic used in this particular thread because it's wrong. Who's hiding?

    thrillerbuck

  • thrillerbuck said...

    The act of shopping is not the same as owning something tangible.

    This just in... WalMart doesn't sell anything tangible.

    Schaefnuts70426

  • Schaefnuts70426 said...

    This just in... WalMart doesn't sell anything tangible.

    I'm assuming this is sarcasm. Let me fill in the part I cut out:

    The act of shopping is not the same as owning something tangible (,especially something that requires government registration).

    thrillerbuck

  • thrillerbuck said...

    I'm assuming this is sarcasm. Let me fill in the part I cut out:

    The act of shopping is not the same as owning something tangible (,especially something that requires government registration).

    Cars require government registration. A fishing license requires government registration. So does a hunting license. When will the NY Times be publishing those lists? Give up man. You're grasping at straws right now. Unfortunately, your endless splitting of hairs can't defeat common sense.

    This post was edited by Schaefnuts70426 on 1/18/2013 at 5:45 PM

    Schaefnuts70426

Ohio State
247Sports
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports