-
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
15045 votes total - (14241)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- This post is for members of Bucknuts or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
sarasotabcg ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
1528 votes total - (1502)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
playmea
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4658 votes total - Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
- (4151)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
goby said...
No, moron, he was shot because Zimmerman should have been minding his business, but instead stalked the kid until the kid confronted him. This would NEVER have happened if Zimmmerman wasnt a whack job trying to play cop even when 911 told him to leave the kid alone. Hell, if some stranger is stalking me I am going to confront him too and beat his azzz! Also, he WAS stalking him in part because he was black...thats clear. So stop being an angry white male and just think about it from the families point of view...their kid is DEAD and rotting in the ground because some bigoted barney fife wanna be didnt mind his own business and stalked a kid for NO REASON. You wouldnt defend yourself if some stranger was following you for no reason? What if it was your son? I bet you would sure feel different and would be thinking, why didnt this guy leave my kid alone, why was he following him, harassing him? At the very least he should be charged with criminal menacing or manslaughter. I dont think he meant to kill the kid, but his own stupidity put them both in a situation that would not have happened had ne not stalked the kid.
This post was edited by ng164300 on 4/3/2012 at 12:57 PM
-
ng164300 said...
If you attack someone just because they are following you then they are justified in shooting you. You sound like a thug. My race has nothing to do with it seeing as how this is a hispanic guy shooting a black guy. The funeral director said that Trayvon didn't have a scratch on him but there is proof that Zimmerman had injuries. It is pretty clear who attacked who.
-
goby said...
No, moron, he was shot because Zimmerman should have been minding his business, but instead stalked the kid until the kid confronted him. This would NEVER have happened if Zimmmerman wasnt a whack job trying to play cop even when 911 told him to leave the kid alone. Hell, if some stranger is stalking me I am going to confront him too and beat his azzz! Also, he WAS stalking him in part because he was black...thats clear. So stop being an angry white male and just think about it from the families point of view...their kid is DEAD and rotting in the ground because some bigoted barney fife wanna be didnt mind his own business and stalked a kid for NO REASON. You wouldnt defend yourself if some stranger was following you for no reason? What if it was your son? I bet you would sure feel different and would be thinking, why didnt this guy leave my kid alone, why was he following him, harassing him? At the very least he should be charged with criminal menacing or manslaughter. I dont think he meant to kill the kid, but his own stupidity put them both in a situation that would not have happened had ne not stalked the kid.
-
grccoins said...
This is the second person I've seen that maintains that someone should have their "azz" beaten for following someone in their neighborhood. Since when have we become so righteously defensive that we can beat someone up for simply conducting themselves in a legal manner that makes us feel possibly uncomfortable? If so then I am free to beat up someone who protests against a cause I support. I am free to beat someone up who has a tattoo I don't like. I am free to beat someone up that can't seem to wear their pants over their underwear.
From my point of view, if you are willing to attack someone for simply following you, you are much more of the problem in this issue than the solution.
playmea
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4658 votes total - Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
- (4151)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
grccoins said...
This is the second person I've seen that maintains that someone should have their "azz" beaten for following someone in their neighborhood. Since when have we become so righteously defensive that we can beat someone up for simply conducting themselves in a legal manner that makes us feel possibly uncomfortable? If so then I am free to beat up someone who protests against a cause I support. I am free to beat someone up who has a tattoo I don't like. I am free to beat someone up that can't seem to wear their pants over their underwear.
From my point of view, if you are willing to attack someone for simply following you, you are much more of the problem in this issue than the solution.
-
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
656 votes total - (854)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
grccoins said...
This is the second person I've seen that maintains that someone should have their "azz" beaten for following someone in their neighborhood. Since when have we become so righteously defensive that we can beat someone up for simply conducting themselves in a legal manner that makes us feel possibly uncomfortable? If so then I am free to beat up someone who protests against a cause I support. I am free to beat someone up who has a tattoo I don't like. I am free to beat someone up that can't seem to wear their pants over their underwear.
From my point of view, if you are willing to attack someone for simply following you, you are much more of the problem in this issue than the solution.
-
grccoins said...
This is the second person I've seen that maintains that someone should have their "azz" beaten for following someone in their neighborhood. Since when have we become so righteously defensive that we can beat someone up for simply conducting themselves in a legal manner that makes us feel possibly uncomfortable? If so then I am free to beat up someone who protests against a cause I support. I am free to beat someone up who has a tattoo I don't like. I am free to beat someone up that can't seem to wear their pants over their underwear.
From my point of view, if you are willing to attack someone for simply following you, you are much more of the problem in this issue than the solution.
Badger Alumni, Lifelong Buckeye.
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
656 votes total - (854)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
playmea
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4658 votes total - Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
- (4151)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
fstargell said...
Sorry but the only person lawfully going about is business was Martin. See you my friend is the reason so many young blacks and hispanics are wrongly killed by police and then justified. Martin didn't hunt someone down nor threaten anyone. he was followed. I would like to see what would you do if some strange person approached you with a gun after following. So you are supposed to stay there? No you run which he did and then was caught by Zimmerman where a fight occurred. My question for you, why does Zimmerman have a right to self defense but Martin doesn't. Is that because he is black and in your eyes guilty of doing nothing but walking while black?
-
hdworship said...
When you see all the things Zimmerman said it just does not add up. He was trying to hold the kid there until the place came and was beat up. Also, Trayvon was 7 houses away from home so we are to believe he doubled back and attack Zimmerman when he's on the phone with his girlfriend afraid of what this guy is up too? Zimmerman will be charged because of the lies he told, but may get off because a a dead child cannot tell his story, but just like in the OJ case Zimmerman and his family will lose everything after the civil case.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4












Enhanced Video Shows Gashes On Zimmerman's Head