-
McCague said...
I can put evidence on the back of my head just like that by laying down and hitting my head on the sidewalk. Not only that, but the back of my jacket would have dirt on it. In the absence of a witness a reasonable doubt can be cast by presenting just those possibilities. Where's the photo of his broken nose? I have never seen someone with a broken nose not have a black eye, or two black eyes. When Zimmerman passes a lie-detector test I will give a little ground on his injuries. If I was innocent and telling the truth I would ask for a lie-detector test. They couldn't shut me up from telling my side of the story. If I was guilty I would cower behind a lawyer.... that's my test for guilt or innocence - firm unwavering account from the start or defensive story-changing throughout. What do you think when a lawyer starts proposing several different scenarios? What's wrong with the real story if it's true?
-
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14497 votes total - (13838)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BucksinWA said...
Not commenting on anything else but the nature of the injury itself, this is a very minor injury. Very minor. Even a small cut on the scalp bleeds a lot. I bet if you cleaned the blood off those are about a half inch and one inch long. I've had bigger paper cuts.
As far as how he got them, I think his foot slipped on all the shells and he fell and hit his head.
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14497 votes total - (13838)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
McCague said...
I can put evidence on the back of my head just like that by laying down and hitting my head on the sidewalk. Not only that, but the back of my jacket would have dirt on it. In the absence of a witness a reasonable doubt can be cast by presenting just those possibilities. Where's the photo of his broken nose? I have never seen someone with a broken nose not have a black eye, or two black eyes. When Zimmerman passes a lie-detector test I will give a little ground on his injuries. If I was innocent and telling the truth I would ask for a lie-detector test. They couldn't shut me up from telling my side of the story. If I was guilty I would cower behind a lawyer.... that's my test for guilt or innocence - firm unwavering account from the start or defensive story-changing throughout. What do you think when a lawyer starts proposing several different scenarios? What's wrong with the real story if it's true?
-
BUCKSRUS said...
Interesting concept. Charge the suspect with the strongest charge possible and if that doesn't work, go with something less just to get a conviction. What a great country!
Kind of like throwing a pile of crap against the wall and seeing what sticks.
Not an attack on you Tim. Just the idea of random law in action.
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14497 votes total - (13838)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BUCKSRUS said...
I heard some people on tv news programs talking about this. If the evidence is strong enough to charge Zimmerman with murder then go with that. If the evidence is only enough for manslaughter, then that would be the proper charge.
Florida law probably does allow for a "backup" conviction if the original doesn't work out. It smacks of charging a person twice for the same offense.
If the jury doesn't convict him based on the evidence and testimony, why wouldn't he get to walk? He would have been found not guilty, right?
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14497 votes total - (13838)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars









New Zimmerman Evidence