Online Now 2872

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

On this Board 55
Record: 9642 (12/28/2012)

Online now 2763
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

Obama, the class warfare president

  • OHSethIO said...

    I think your the moron, but each has his own opinion.... All's I know is that since he got in office he's fucked me on every turn he could. Whether its freezing my pay, raising the costs of my and my families health care or cutting benefits.

    But ya, go ahead vote him back into office, we will have another 4 years of bullshit and even more lies to deal with.

    I think that when POTUS Obama took office he looked you up and told his people to make sure you got "fucked" on everything. Do you work for the government? Do you work for Obama? Who froze your pay? Who cut your benefits? You're just another hater who doesn't have a clue.

    dave1954

  • joetheman said...

    I believe this video explains it all very well.

    Just another poor man's Rush. One of his shows told us about the "real" Obama and his clouded past. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    dave1954

  • goby said...

    No, he is even more stupid because he hasnt learned a thing from history. These people arent disliking Obama because of failed economic policies, because his HAVE worked...as he digs us out of the failed conservative policies. Yeah, progress is slow, but I tell you what, what if we wouldnt have done some of the stuff he did? No recovery act, no auto bailout...etc...sorry, but things would be a whole lot worse than they are now. We actually have manufacturing leading us out of the recovery. When was the last time we heard that? When the Bush was done we had about half the manufacturing jobs than when he started his presidency. The republicans want growth by just completely giving the business community everything they want, but what we know is they dont build an economy to last. If you just eliminate all regulation and build an economy that just completely caters to the business comunity all they do is get greedy and build something that is unsustainable and not built to last! Also known as creating a bubble! This usually hurts the middle class along the way because the business community wants to disinvest in manufacturing (labor costs) and real jobs in favor of jobs and schemes that only create cash, so you lose jobs. In the end you lose even more jobs because any jobs that were build are lost because they are not founded in the creation of something real (you know, just low paying or transactional job)...so when the bubble bursts....boom! This is why you are a dayum fool to talk shite about Dems when you guys dont even understand simple economics, no take that back, you understand them, you just arent capable of admitting when you are wrong about your philosophy. So you want to drag the rest of us down with you. You really are just against Obama for other reasons...hmmmm??? Wonder that that reason is????

    Don't you just hate it when a guys posts the truth! Good job!

    dave1954

  • pazbuc said...

    Obama's policies aren't "helping" anyone in this country. He is running up the national debt beyond repair. He has no plan to bring SS and Medicare under control. The bill wills will come due in a decade or so and everyone will have to pay not just the rich. If Obama is reelected his 8 years in office will go down in history as the worst 8 years ever for the US.

    Please explain your darling Reagan who raised taxes every year in office. His "rich" tax was 50%....please explain

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • OR perhaps a Republican who has been "fiscally" responsible in the last 60 years?

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • pazbuc,

    There would be no problems with SS and Medicare if Bush had not bought the 2000 election with the largest surplus in history. Hope your $600 vote was worth it, you helped cause the largest deficit in history. Proud?

    McCague

  • McCague said...

    pazbuc,

    There would be no problems with SS and Medicare if Bush had not bought the 2000 election with the largest surplus in history. Hope your $600 vote was worth it, you helped cause the largest deficit in history. Proud?

    I'll be glad to pay back the $600 if that will fix the deficit. I didn't want it nor did any of my retired friends. In fact I would be willing to axe the Bush tax cuts.....all of them on everybody. My fix:
    Eliminate the Bush tax cuts on the rich in 2013
    Eliminate the Bush tax cuts on the middle class in 2014
    Eliminate the Bush tax cuts on everyone else in 2015
    Raise full SS age
    Reduce SS COL
    Raise SS tax to 7.0%
    Means test Medicare
    Are you in?

    This post was edited by pazbuc on 4/11/2012 at 4:08 PM

    pazbuc

  • still waiting Pazbuc............

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • DSBUX said...

    still waiting Pazbuc............

    don't answer, DETOX won't understand it anyways.......

    minsterbuckeye

  • still waiting minsterdouche.....?

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • pretty sure I sent you an email minster, no answer?

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • Again, running away from facts

    signature image signature image signature image

    DSBUX

  • DSBUX said...

    OR perhaps a Republican who has been "fiscally" responsible in the last 60 years?

    The Republicans have not been good stewards of the economy. Obama has made their problems worse and is not willing to try to fix it. He ignored the recommendations of Bowles and Simpson after he appointed them for a fix. His tax the rich proposal is a drop in the bucket to the problem. $47B over 10 years when his deficits are running over $1T a year. It's like trying to save the Titanic by bailing with a spoon. What a joke.

    pazbuc

  • McCague said...

    pazbuc,

    There would be no problems with SS and Medicare if Bush had not bought the 2000 election with the largest surplus in history. Hope your $600 vote was worth it, you helped cause the largest deficit in history. Proud?

    Here we go with buying the election thing from you again, we went round and round about this before and you even conceded you were incorrect, but people beleive what they want to beleive I guess.

    You did throw in a new wrinkle, stating that Bush inherited the largest surplus in history? wow where did you come up with that?
    Here is a good article that uses the Govt Treasury web site for historical numbers on the US debt. you will notice that we have not had a balanced budget let alone a surplus according to the US treasurey since Dwight Eisenhour and in fact look at the years Clinton was in office, you notice it never decreased? interesting huh? I give Clinton a lot of credit for being the most fiscal responsible pres we have had in awhile, much more than Bush or Obama.

    http://www.geldpress.com/2008/07/us-budget-reporting-deception/

    gpracer73

  • OHSethIO said...

    If anyone votes for Obama again, your an idiot.

    He said himself, if he cant change things by the end of his first term not to re elect him.

    The only thing has has changed is more debt, and the same problems as before if not more.

    You're wrong. Unemployment is down. Economy is growing.
    Check your facts.

    Who do you think is responsible for this economic mess? People like Mitt Romney, who have no connection to real life. They just want more.

    ysbuck1

  • gpracer73 said...

    Here we go with buying the election thing from you again, we went round and round about this before and you even conceded you were incorrect, but people beleive what they want to beleive I guess.

    You did throw in a new wrinkle, stating that Bush inherited the largest surplus in history? wow where did you come up with that? Here is a good article that uses the Govt Treasury web site for historical numbers on the US debt. you will notice that we have not had a balanced budget let alone a surplus according to the US treasurey since Dwight Eisenhour and in fact look at the years Clinton was in office, you notice it never decreased? interesting huh? I give Clinton a lot of credit for being the most fiscal responsible pres we have had in awhile, much more than Bush or Obama.

    http://www.geldpress.com/2008/07/us-budget-reporting-deception/

    You're confusing debt with deficit. Deficit refers to the end of the budget year balance. Debt refers to the total cumulative balance for all budget years.

    ysbuck1

  • I find it interesting that Obama made it clear how he felt about the policy of "men only" membership at Agusta. Then he turns atound and ivites the muslim botherhood for a visit and give them 5 billion dollars. WOW! Wonder if next he will suggest sharia law as the next step in improvement plan. In George Bush's two terms our debt increased 8 trillion dollars over 8 years. Obama had manged to exceed even that with 5 trillion more over a less than four years. This man needs to go NOW! More government is not the answer!

    LoudounVabuck

  • ysbuck1 said...

    You're confusing debt with deficit. Deficit refers to the end of the budget year balance. Debt refers to the total cumulative balance for all budget years.

    Not confusing either, if you look at the US Treasury chart you will notice that the yearly deficit never decreased under clinton, the debt did decrease but did not disapear. and acutally if you read the CBO report from the time period they mention the accouting trick that they used, which was social security revenue, they were counting that as total govt revenue which is very misleading, social securtiy revenue is supposed to cover curent and future payments but in this instance it was used to fund other sections of govt.
    This was both a republican and democrat problem

    gpracer73

  • natiboybuckeye said...

    Obama has flaws alot of them but at least he will not put the tax burden on the middle class even with he's flaws he is not that stupid but its your choice jack$$ how will you vote!!!!! Tax dollars will be spent it's just which way wake up dude

    There should never be a tax burden. If we just would have been smart and let people take care of themselves instead of the government trying to take care of people this would not even be an issue. Problem is not tax dollars being spent, its tax dollars we DONT have being spent. You need to wake up dude.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Downtown

  • TimMcM said...

    Anyone who makes less than $200,000 a year and does not vote for Obama and Dems for Congress is the real idiot.

    You liberals really have a problem with the successful people don't you.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Downtown

  • DSBUX said...

    OR perhaps a Republican who has been "fiscally" responsible in the last 60 years?

    Are you that blind??? Name a president that has been fiscally responsible, Dem or Rep. Both parties are a complete joke.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Downtown

  • ysbuck1 said...

    You're wrong. Unemployment is down. Economy is growing. Check your facts.

    Who do you think is responsible for this economic mess? People like Mitt Romney, who have no connection to real life. They just want more.

    really? Romney is responsible for the current economy? how? he was simply a Govenor how did he create the downturn in the economy?

    Unless you are blaming the rich? that is pretty narrow minded and a simple response. so you ignore the artificial housing bubble? you ignore the econonmic problems of europe and asia, you ignore the out of control spending by our govt, you ignore the american peoples need for more with less, you ignore the tech bubble collapse, and so on

    much like health care debates, people that try to make a very complex problem into a partisian argument or pin point one small factor is silly and in my opininion is why we are here. this is the argument the dolts in washington make every day and why they dont lead or accomplish anything.

    gpracer73

  • Unemployment is down because of discouraged workers. A lot of jobs have been created during the Obama administration but more have been lost meaning more people do not have jobs than when Obama started.

    Cody_Mayne

  • A Ham sandwich can beat this clown of a president. he wil go down as the worst we have ever had; a radical socialist who hates successful people and business, has not had a real budget since he took office, bows to kings, spends like a drunked sailor and has no intention of slashing expenses, has no experience except as a community organizer, is very misleading,has no energy nor foreign policy, spent 2 years on Obamacare that 60%of the country hates, warns the supreme court about Obamacare and can only read from a teleprompter. Other than that he is ok.

    stevecr

  • ysbuck1 said...

    Who do you think is responsible for this economic mess? People like Mitt Romney, who have no connection to real life. They just want more.

    Romney has been a successful businessman......Obama has been a community organizer. Which one has the connection to real life?

    pazbuc