-
Buckeye Warrior ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14576 votes total - (13916)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
bradysmanboobs
- 2 stars Rating: 37
605 votes total - (158)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
bradysmanboobs
- 2 stars Rating: 37
605 votes total - (158)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
bradysmanboobs said...
Unit D, the D in your name must be for Dunce! Racial profiling is EFFECTIVE and the MAJORITY of americans believe in it! Public safety takes priority over the butthurt feelings of brainwashed libs like you.
If people like you were in charge, no one would ever be arrested. There would be no law and order.
-
bradysmanboobs said...
Unit D, the D in your name must be for Dunce! Racial profiling is EFFECTIVE and the MAJORITY of americans believe in it! Public safety takes priority over the butthurt feelings of brainwashed libs like you.
If people like you were in charge, no one would ever be arrested. There would be no law and order.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by McCague on 4/25/2012 at 8:03 PM
-
shalvoy said...
That law is BS. It says anyone who is supected of being here illegally is to be detained if they cannot verify they are here legally. I have no papeers that say I'm here legally but I was born here and so were my folks. This law stinks of racial profiling, and that cowboy Arpaio is a thug with a badge.
Buckeye Warrior ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14576 votes total - (13916)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
sryan2 said...
"The last guy that got profiled for looking like a hooded teenager ended up being shot and killed by his profiler, who all right-wingers are now defending and applauding."
More lies and misrepresentations from a liberal... Shocking. I'm certain you would consider me to be a "right-winger". Please show where I have either defended Zimmerman's actions let alone applaud them. The only thing you will find is an advocation for due process and disgust at the senseless tragedy because some idiot didn't listen to the cops (who happens to be an Hispanic Democrat by the way). As you would expect, I tend to associate with other "right-wingers" and I have yet to find anyone who is cheering for George Zimmerman (nor are they looking for some symbolic prosecution without a fair trial which he is entitled to just like OJ). It's a shame though that people such as yourself (and Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, etc.) see something like this as an opportunity to score political capital and create further divisiveness (again intentionally ignoring the fact that Zimmerman was neither white nor a conservative).
However, I will freely admit that as a frequent flier I appreciate it when TSA gives a more thorough pat-down to an adult male in Islamic attire than little old ladies in wheel chairs and young children with their parents. Of course, this is "profiling" which obviously makes me a racist and "radical" Christian. I thought liberals were supposed to be fond of academics so it confuses me why they are so passionate about ignoring statistics... Common sense on the other hand has never been their strong suit.
This post was edited by Unit_D on 4/25/2012 at 8:39 PM
-
Buckeye Warrior ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14576 votes total - (13916)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
sryan2 said...
"The last guy that got profiled for looking like a hooded teenager ended up being shot and killed by his profiler, who all right-wingers are now defending and applauding."
More lies and misrepresentations from a liberal... Shocking. I'm certain you would consider me to be a "right-winger". Please show where I have either defended Zimmerman's actions let alone applaud them. The only thing you will find is an advocation for due process and disgust at the senseless tragedy because some idiot didn't listen to the cops (who happens to be an Hispanic Democrat by the way). As you would expect, I tend to associate with other "right-wingers" and I have yet to find anyone who is cheering for George Zimmerman (nor are they looking for some symbolic prosecution without a fair trial which he is entitled to just like OJ). It's a shame though that people such as yourself (and Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, etc.) see something like this as an opportunity to score political capital and create further divisiveness (again intentionally ignoring the fact that Zimmerman was neither white nor a conservative).
However, I will freely admit that as a frequent flier I appreciate it when TSA gives a more thorough pat-down to an adult male in Islamic attire than little old ladies in wheel chairs and young children with their parents. Of course, this is "profiling" which obviously makes me a racist and "radical" Christian. I thought liberals were supposed to be fond of academics so it confuses me why they are so passionate about ignoring statistics... Common sense on the other hand has never been their strong suit.
This post was edited by McCague on 4/25/2012 at 8:49 PM
-
Buckeye Warrior ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
14576 votes total - (13916)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
McCague said...
Then who have we been arguing with over these last few weeks over the Zimmerman case?
As a very frequent flier I would rather they include everyone in closer scrutinization, including me. Terrorists exist in all colors and manner of dress. I don't imagine the 9-11 terrorists were wearing Islamic attire when they boarded those planes. If I were going to take over or bomb a plane, I certainly wouldn't wear my crazy-man clothes and have uni-bomber hair.
-
McCague said...
Then who have we been arguing with over these last few weeks over the Zimmerman case? We were the ones arguing that he should be tried from the start. It was conservatives who were invoking the "Stand-your-ground" law until he was about to be tried, then it was all about "the right to a fair trial." As if we were advocating for an unfair trial.
As a very frequent flier I would rather they include everyone in closer scrutinization, including me. Terrorists exist in all colors and manner of dress. I don't imagine the 9-11 terrorists were wearing Islamic attire when they boarded those planes. If I were going to take over or bomb a plane, I certainly wouldn't wear crazy-man clothes and have uni-bomber hair.
-
sryan2 said...
"Terrorists exist in all colors and manner of dress"... You're absolutely right. You never know when a 9 year old with cerebral palsy is going to decide to take out a plane, http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/04/25/family-misses-flight-after-tsa-gives-pat-down-to-girl-with-cerebral-palsy/ . You really can't make up the insanity you guys believe/advocate.
Here's a little analogy for you to help break it down even further... We have four ponds in my neighborhood. Three are man made and one if natural fed. All of them have fish. However, the one that is natural fed has by far and away the most and largest varieties. Let's make the assumption that the people living around these bodies of water all take great pride in the one closest to them. Liberals would feel it is appropriate to require that equal time be spent fishing at all four so as not to offend any neighbors. Everyone else would simply recognize how ridiculous that is and go to the pond where they are assured to catch the most fish. Meanwhile, the liberals would proceed to ridicule them for not being as intellectually advanced and sensitive as they are. After all, it is not results which matter but rather how people feel that is important.
Our security personnel need to be fishing in the right ponds for many reasons but including that we don't have unlimited resources to finance them wasting time trying to catch fish in a wading pool so we can appease the left's demented view of political correctness.
This post was edited by Unit_D on 4/26/2012 at 8:19 AM
-
sryan2 said...
You see what you want to see and interpret things however they best support your personal agenda. I get that your sky is purple and I'm under no illusion that I could change a mindset such as yours. Again though, I thought liberals were supposed to be fond of academics so it confuses me why they are so passionate about ignoring statistics...
-
Unit_D said...
Here in a nutshell is how the looney tunes right justify profiling:
First, gin up a perceived "enemy." This is the easy part - you can do it on a purely physical component. Blacks were always an easy target - hell, all one had to do was find one black person who "commited' a crime against a white and voila! ALL blacks needed to be scrutinized, then demonized, then marginalized.
Well, that lost its luster over time (damn you Rosa Parks!) but never fear - here come the gays! I'll bet if we look hard enough we can find an effeminate looking gay guy who molested a child (don't worry -we'll make one up if we can't) and then voila! gays are one step away from getting Fido drunk and clearing off the dining room table.
Now, wouldn't ya just know it that the damn gays are getting all uppity - now what? Hey, how about Muslims? We know the damn Iraquis crashed planes into buildings (no, they were mostly Saudis - you know, the guys that Bush was best buddies with) and they loves them some Muslim religion over there, so why not? Hell, we can even TELL what they look like, what with them wearing all that get-up and everything.
Besides, they hate up for our freedoms, and our cheeseburgers, and for the fact that while we sit here and moan over the war on religion that our buddies at Fox tell us we're in we take the same hatred we think is being directed at us good 'ol god-fearing sumbitches and we use it against somebody else!
Damn, how the f#%k stupid ARE we????
You can come up with as many jack-ass "pond" analogies as you want. It's common practice for the bigoted or the fearful to define their prejudices in said terms. By doing so, they are then all able to (collectively) bob heads together with a resounding chorus of "yep, that's right!", as if in some alternate world two idiots make one thinking person.
P.S. I'll bet Tim McVeigh would have passed your terrorist test, wouldn't he? Especially if he was wearing a cross.
Every time the thinking portion of America thinks you dolts can't get any dumber you prove us wrong.
-
Buckeye Warrior said...
The Obama Administration is caught between a rock and a hrad place on this. How can they argue AGAINST the Arizona Law when the Federal Government does the same thing as the Arizona Law? States have to uphold Federal Law too, they can't just ignore them. But that seems to be what the Obama Administration is arguing. If that were true, then every State could just ignore all Federal Laws if they want. That seems like an odd argument to make.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 5




SCOUS Seems To Like AZ Immigration Law