-
PABuck24 said...
Unemployment has gone up under Barry....and they're not even reporting the real #s....(i.e. underemployed, or those who've stopped looking for work)....Obama has us on track to be the next Greece. Great. How about fuel prices and expendable income killing the middle class. This is what you get when you have an amateur with no business experience, who's a communitiy organizer (agitator) in the White House. He is clueless. You'd have to be high to re-elect Obama. He's going to get pummeled at the polls in November. People are waking up and don't buy the media's garbage any longer.
shaunsimpson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
3160 votes total - Shaun Simpson
- (10438)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TimMcM said...
Unemployment only when up under Obama if you start the day he was sworn in - which is just stupid. He was in office 10 days in Jan. 09 and there were like 780,000 jobs lost. He was in office 38 days for the Feb count in which about 750,000 jobs were lost. 69 days in for March and 720,000 jobs lost.
Only idiots would think that Obama was in any way responsible for the loss of approximately 2.5 million jobs in his first 69 days in office. If you look at the facts it is clears that Obama helped slow down the job loss number each month until we finally started having positive numbers.
If you think he did not turn things around quickly enough, pick up a history book. This was the worse economy since the Great Depression. How many years did it take for economy to rebound from that one?
shaunsimpson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
3160 votes total - Shaun Simpson
- (10438)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Seattlebuckfan
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2609 votes total - (1453)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TiffinDawg said...
If you were ever to look at the "right-wing" radical website named irs.org, you would realize that your statement is absolutely ludicrous. Top 10% pay around 75% of the taxes. The top 10% represents individuals, families, or businesses bringing in $100,000 + per year. I'm in that range and I can't buy anyone off. Maybe the real sleeze bags are our life-long politicians. Without them, big business can't perform their dastardly deeds.
Think and research without party bias before you vote this year. We should also ask ourselves if government is so different from us that they can spend and waste more than they bring in.
-
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
634 votes total - (832)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PrimusX said...
I think you're the one who needs their head examined, big guy. Try closer to 70% of the taxes.
The only thing this country is doing is punishing the successful for being successful. The rich will always be able to find places to stash their money, this country needs to stop scarring the people with the money away. We need to be giving them an incentive to spend it (I.E. Make the environment in this country more conducive to businesses.).
This country has a spending problem not a tax problem. We're adding over a trillion dollars of debt a year and the next big chunk of Obama Care hasn't even kicked in yet. The only thing you are doing with this irresponsible spending is punishing the up in coming generation's ability to be prosperous, rather then addressing the true issue at hand. Or, to put it bluntly, running scarred and abdicating responsibility, instead of standing up and fixing the problem.
I wonder how many people would have voted for Obama in 2008 if they knew this was the kind of "Change" he had it mind? I distinctly remember him saying that he would confront difficult issues rather then run from them. He talks big talk, but categorically refuses back it up.
Have a great day.
-
Frozen Buckeye said...
If you live in the upper midwest, you know what a mess Wisconsin is because of Walker. Being a Republican or Democrat doesn't matter, Walker is a moron and an incompetent buffoon. His biggest issue in the eyes of the voters however, is that he has effectively attempted to dismantle collective bargaining as well as any downgrade any semblance of public education in the state of WI.
bradysmanboobs
- 2 stars Rating: 37
605 votes total - (158)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
bradysmanboobs
- 2 stars Rating: 37
605 votes total - (158)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
bleedscarlet said...
No, you need your head examined . The top 10% make 90% of the wealth and only pay 30 -40 % of the taxes, Great gig if you can get it buy buying off the government the supreme ass holes and the media, And yes most of the media is bought and paid for by big money.
bradysmanboobs
- 2 stars Rating: 37
605 votes total - (158)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
codexp2 said...
But...but...75% isn't enough. We need to do our share and contribute more, so other people that choose to do less can have better health coverage than we do, so their kids can receive a discounted college education our kids aren't eligible for, and so that unemployment can last for 2 years so people don't even have to actively look for a job.
Yeah, I said it.
-
bradysmanboobs said...
Tim, you're kidding right? Obama has zero experience working in the private sector and yet you believe he knows better than Romney (an exceptional businessman) how to run the economy? Thanks for the laugh!
I take that back, that Obama has zero experience in the private sector. During his crack smoking days, he probably was selling drugs to help pay for his crack habit.
Yeah, I said it.
-
shalvoy said...
That's not quite accurate. If you think we live in a welfare state now just wait til you start pricing those people out of college. There will be no end. You like to name all of our problems without thinking of how to solve them. Desroying our environment by deregulation is not a solution. Lower taxes and defunding of public education is not a solution. Developing a Theocracy where everyone has the same belief system as everyone else is not the solution. Constant name calling and disagreement is not how I raise my children - I tell them that if there is a problem then you should work together to find a solution that you both benefit from. Regardless of how much money you have, greed is not a virtue - in fact, its one the 7 Deadly Sins. I'm not advocating laziness or apathy, but shouldn't we work together to make sure that the less-fortunate among us have at least the same oppotunity to work towards something they can be proud of? So that they can achieve what their family before them was not able to achieve. Everything is alwayss me, me, me. That is not a virtuous way to exist.
-
sryan2 said...
I do not believe that the negative things you point out are what the majority of constituents in either of the two major parties advocate. Unfortunately, it is the extremists who tend to grab the headlines (and microphones). The real challenge is HOW "we work together to make sure that the less-fortunate among us have at least the same opportunity to work towards something they can be proud of"... I'm telling you right now that the upper Middle Class (who some contend are part of "the rich") are already paying far more than their "fair share" and should not (cannot) be burdened with even more of the load (particularly when almost half the country pays nothing in Federal income taxes). The truth is things like "The Buffet Rule" would only fund our government for one day in the next fiscal year and seven over the next ten years (which is nothing more than political theater but go for it as far as I'm concerned). Despite the naive belief that we can solve our problems just by taxing "the rich", the reality is we have a FAR greater spending problem than a revenue one... Things like Obamacare will NOT improve what is already a dire situation.
I also agree with you about the "me, me, me, me" culture... No one thinks it is their responsibility to step up (look at the hysterical reactions to things like SB5 which at the very least was a strong basis for needed reforms). IF increased taxes will go to eliminating our deficit, I'm willing to contribute to dig us out of the hole (and I will guarantee you over half of what I make already goes to government through all the various taxing mechanisms which is beyond absurd). However, entitlement spending must be significantly dialed back if we are to be realistic and sincere about addressing our problems. Additionally, government has to become a more efficient entity and it's management and employees brought in line with private sector realities.
Finally, it's time to call people like the following out and stop rewarding laziness and apathy while punishing hard work and success, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2kGPdxkofo . No more making it more profitable and easier not to work rather than getting a job. No more disability and insurance fraud. No more subsidizing things like cell phones. No more having people selling their food stamp loaded cards for profit. No more "settling for pennies on the dollar" for debt people racked up on their own accord. No more suing people as a desired method of income. No more allowing the "pain seekers" to cripple our healthcare system. No more aid of any kind to people who aren't willing to take a drug test before they get their "Obamabucks". No more providing benefits to people who are in our country illegally. No more telling people they are victims because they are stupid. ENOUGH.
AND let's pursue white collar crime with the same vigor and severe punishment as blue collar crime (I'm talking about you John Corzine and other Democrats and Republicans alike).
-
bradysmanboobs said...
Wisconsin was in a mess because of out of control spending by the spenocrats, but Walker has gotten it under control. Thank God, Walker has eliminated collective bargaining for public employees!
Frozen Buckeye, you sound like the typical unionized public sector worker that feels entitled to an absurdly early retirement, inflated wages, platinum plated healthcare and ridiculous pension benefits. You would never make it in the private sector and you want to know why? It's because you are a loser and consumed with jealousy and believe others owe you. No one owes you shit!
Badger Alumni, Lifelong Buckeye.
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
634 votes total - (832)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Frozen Buckeye said...
Nice assumptions. First, I'm not a union member, I'm a member of the private sector. I feel entitled to an absurdly early retirement because I was smart and started investing and managing money for my retirement at a young age. Microsoft Stock financed my college education, and I have paid for my law degree. You're right - nobody owes me shit because I don't need their handouts.
Excuse me if I didn't check my humanity at the door to make a few dollars. I'm willing to spend my money to make a better state for people because frankly, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. What's your excuse?
-
Frozen Buckeye
- 5 stars Rating: 83
634 votes total - (832)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Frozen Buckeye said...
True enough. I just feel that it's important to spend to support said links, because sometimes, there really is talent down at link 210-216 that just needs a little bit of help to be able to rise to the top. My father moved to this country with 2 suitcases and a Medical Degree, but subsisted on what was essentially government assistance while working at a Brooklyn Veteran's Hospital... I think his total income was something like $13,000 a year in 1976-ish. He was making it work, and ended up through his own hard work starting a private practice and is doing quite well for himself.
Granted, I feel this way because I have a personal connection to a success story borne of it, but, hey, nobody's perfect.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Wisconsin has lost 24,000 jobs in the last year