Online Now 2368

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

On this Board 85
Record: 9642 (12/28/2012)

Online now 2403
Record: 10904 (2/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Front Row

The place to discuss inside information, the latest rumors and scoop on the Buckeyes

Around the 'Shoe

Anything and everything football related that has to do with your Buckeyes

The Best Damn Recruiting Board

If it's football recruiting, OSU-style, it's cussed and discussed here

Bucknutin' But Net

Talk a little Buckeye basketball with your fellow Ohio State hoopsters

The Bucknuts Hot Spot

The place to be for topics too hot for any place else

The Buckeye Babe Thread

Share your favorite pix, a special lady in your life or someone else's life

Reply

hey CNN, NO questions on GAS.......

  • gpracer73 said...

    Thanks for the link, good info, although it looks like it came close to the 70's level in the early 80's.

    I had only seen what some folks had posted on here and the various articles of Obama claiming we have more domestic oil now than ever.

    Actually the same data is right in the USA Today article the YOU posted. You cant miss it because its a freaking chart the shows that production steadily dropped since the 70's like UM said.

    The article aslo states it is a oil production "boomlet" - meaning a mini-boom for the first time in a along time.

    DId you even read it before you posted it?

    PhilaBuck

  • U.S. oil production on government land is at a record level. That is where all the headlines came from. http://coloradoindependent.com/110275/obama-touts-record-domestic-oil-and-gas-production-in-wake-of-pipeline-rejection

    signature image signature image signature image

    ng164300

  • In regards to someones earlier reply:

    Here is info about the Rocky Mountain oil.

    I would imagine the cost of extracting such oil would be at a high price, but at today's price per barrel would most likely outweigh the costs. Never knew the Rocky Mountain region had so much oil, thanks to the poster who mentioned it.

    Rocky Mountain Oil

    The Rocky Mountains house the largest oil shale deposits in the world. Shell Oil and the U.S. government are taking steps to tap into it with an in-ground heating method.

    www.nuwireinvestor.com

    stoneybuck

  • They (big oil) just know we have to keep bending over and taking in in the keyster!

    signature image

    GO BUCKEYES

    BIGBUCK20

  • DSBUX said...

    OH yeah Minster, OPEC controls prices and Presidents don't! Your lame attempt to link the two proves you need to read some books

    are u really that much of a idiot or do u just act like one on here....u need to read a bigger book then the "The Cat in the hat" see if mommy can get you at least the Hardy Boys book.....

    minsterbuckeye

  • minsterbuckeye said...

    hey what is the number one thing people are talking about, and the President is having his little speech on Energy TODAY.......and not one question on GAS in the debate last night..... c'mon......

    John King was interested in more important things like "What's your favorite color?".

    pazbuc

  • gpracer73 said...

    Wait, i am confused, I have seen posted on this board by some freindly folks from the far left that the USA is producing more oil now than it has for decades? that Obama alone made this happen. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/story/2011-12-16/us-oil-boom/52053236/1

    Now you come along and say that our production was maxed out over 30 some odd years ago?

    So i should be dumb enough to beleive the folks making the claim that we are producing more now than ever? or dumb enough to belive your statement?

    GP,

    U.S. oil production did peak in the 70's. Nowhere in the article you referenced does it claim that the U.S. is production more oil than previous decades. However, I believe you are referencing the following:

    "...The U.S. has reversed another decades-long trend. It began producing more crude oil in 2008 than the year before and accelerated that upswing 3% in the first nine months of this year compared with the same period in 2010. That production has helped reduce U.S. imports of crude oil by about 10% since 2006."

    If you read closely, you realize that U.S. oil production began exceeding the previous year's , rather than decreasing in 2008 and the trend has continued through 2011. What this means is that oil production experienced marginal increases in oil production from 2008 thru 2011. That is a far cry from producing more oil than we have in decades. Before the recent up-tick, our nation's oil production DECLINED for more than 30 years. We are NOT producing more oil than we did 30 years ago, we're producing more oil than we did 3 years ago.

    This is a positive sign, but, outside of a major discovery of sweet crude, producing shale oil and tar sands oil is not going to significantly reduce the amount of oil that our nation imports (we don't think we even import from Iran, by the way...though our Allies do).

    You see, the article also references the fact that in 2010, the U.S. consumed more domestically produced oil than imported oil, and then distorts that view to say that the U.S. is a "net exporter" of petroleum products. But, if you do the math, we're STILL importing 49% of the oil we use.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @542BlueBuck

    zeke_tolliver

  • pazbuc said...

    John King was interested in more important things like "What's your favorite color?".

    John King is a puppet......

    minsterbuckeye

  • zeke_tolliver said...

    GP,

    U.S. oil production did peak in the 70's. Nowhere in the article you referenced does it claim that the U.S. is production more oil than previous decades. However, I believe you are referencing the following:

    "...The U.S. has reversed another decades-long trend. It began producing more crude oil in 2008 than the year before and accelerated that upswing 3% in the first nine months of this year compared with the same period in 2010. That production has helped reduce U.S. imports of crude oil by about 10% since 2006."

    If you read closely, you realize that U.S. oil production began exceeding the previous year's , rather than decreasing in 2008 and the trend has continued through 2011. What this means is that oil production experienced marginal increases in oil production from 2008 thru 2011. That is a far cry from producing more oil than we have in decades. Before the recent up-tick, our nation's oil production DECLINED for more than 30 years. We are NOT producing more oil than we did 30 years ago, we're producing more oil than we did 3 years ago.

    This is a positive sign, but, outside of a major discovery of sweet crude, producing shale oil and tar sands oil is not going to significantly reduce the amount of oil that our nation imports (we don't think we even import from Iran, by the way...though our Allies do).

    You see, the article also references the fact that in 2010, the U.S. consumed more domestically produced oil than imported oil, and then distorts that view to say that the U.S. is a "net exporter" of petroleum products. But, if you do the math, we're STILL importing 49% of the oil we use.

    I knew this fact, was just making a point to a few far left posters that tried to argue that OBama himself was out there drilling and getting record amounts of oil a month or so ago.

    gpracer73

  • This post is for members of Bucknuts only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image
    signature image signature image

    Darcangelo

  • minsterbuckeye said...

    hey what is the number one thing people are talking about, and the President is having his little speech on Energy TODAY.......and not one question on GAS in the debate last night..... c'mon......

    #1 The economy

    #2 Major outbreak in the Middle East (Iran and Isreal)

    #3 High Gas prices which hurt #1

    Buckrock

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    That wouldn't work because we simply don't have enough oil left to make a dent in prices here. Our oil production maxed out in the early 70s and has been steadily sinking ever since because we just don't have the reserves left to raise production. Newt is just throwing a sop out to anyone dumb enough to believe it.

    More Liberal talking points from a "moderate".

    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    That wouldn't work because we simply don't have enough oil left to make a dent in prices here. Our oil production maxed out in the early 70s and has been steadily sinking ever since because we just don't have the reserves left to raise production. Newt is just throwing a sop out to anyone dumb enough to believe it.

    Urban, two things are obvious about you from reading this and your other posts:

    1. You don't know the facts of the petroleum industry, especially the new technologies.

    2. You are a Re-Elect Obama, Dyed In The Wool Liberal whose posts are consistently ill informed and skewed to make Zero's towering ego and ineptitude look at least marginally competent in the hope that $4/gal. gasoline and rising food prices won't be noticed by the rest of us.

    You're not looking for honest debate or even facts, just to demean any candidate (Republicans), fact (increased oil production last year, Obama's muslim education and beliefs), or ideology (Christianity) which might impede Obozo's re-election. You seek to divert attention from Obama's record.

    If those of you reading think you and the Country are better off than you were four years ago, keep reading this guy's posts. The rest of us are wasting our time.

    surfscoter

  • Because Obama doesn't want to talk about it...and the $4/gal. that's coming...or possibly $5/gal...

    surfscoter

  • surfscoter said...

    Urban, two things are obvious about you from reading this and your other posts:

    1. You don't know the facts of the petroleum industry, especially the new technologies.

    2. You are a Re-Elect Obama, Dyed In The Wool Liberal whose posts are consistently ill informed and skewed to make Zero's towering ego and ineptitude look at least marginally competent in the hope that $4/gal. gasoline and rising food prices won't be noticed by the rest of us.

    You're not looking for honest debate or even facts, just to demean any candidate (Republicans), fact (increased oil production last year, Obama's muslim education and beliefs), or ideology (Christianity) which might impede Obozo's re-election. You seek to divert attention from Obama's record.

    If those of you reading think you and the Country are better off than you were four years ago, keep reading this guy's posts. The rest of us are wasting our time.

    Yes, because the president is solely responsible for gas prices in this country. I don't care about Obama's record, I think he should have approved the Keystone XL pipeline but there isn't much he can do to lower gas prices.

    Urban_Meyer

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    Yes, because the president is solely responsible for gas prices in this country. I don't care about Obama's record, I think he should have approved the Keystone XL pipeline but there isn't much he can do to lower gas prices.

    "(T)here isn't much he can do to lower gas prices" manifests your ignorance of both Obama's federal government and the petroleum industry.

    surfscoter

  • surfscoter said...

    "(T)here isn't much he can do to lower gas prices" manifests your ignorance of both Obama's federal government and the petroleum industry.

    Quite the contrary, as Obama would have to somehow force OPEC to massively raise production, and there's no way he can do that. Please tell us exactly how Obama is 1) responsible for gas prices as president and 2) how exactly he can lower prices by an appreciable margin.

    Urban_Meyer

  • surfscoter said...

    Urban, two things are obvious about you from reading this and your other posts:

    1. You don't know the facts of the petroleum industry, especially the new technologies.

    2. You are a Re-Elect Obama, Dyed In The Wool Liberal whose posts are consistently ill informed and skewed to make Zero's towering ego and ineptitude look at least marginally competent in the hope that $4/gal. gasoline and rising food prices won't be noticed by the rest of us.

    You're not looking for honest debate or even facts, just to demean any candidate (Republicans), fact (increased oil production last year, Obama's muslim education and beliefs), or ideology (Christianity) which might impede Obozo's re-election. You seek to divert attention from Obama's record.

    If those of you reading think you and the Country are better off than you were four years ago, keep reading this guy's posts. The rest of us are wasting our time.

    Excellent post bro. Spot on and accurate.

    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • pazbuc said...

    John King was interested in more important things like "What's your favorite color?".

    ...and wht is wrong with my mink coat..er, collar..er, nevermind.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Tyriffic1

  • Buckeye Warrior said...

    Excellent post bro. Spot on and accurate.

    Got any proof?

    Urban_Meyer

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    Got any proof?

    Pick on the weak.....

    signature image signature image signature image

    Tyriffic1

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    Got any proof?

    Go back and read what you have posted. Proof enough.

    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • Buckeye Warrior said...

    Go back and read what you have posted. Proof enough.

    Sorry, don't see any proof. Care to point it out?

    Urban_Meyer

  • Urban_Meyer said...

    Sorry, don't see any proof. Care to point it out?

    I thought i made it pretty clear. Go back and read what you wrote. the fact that you can't see that you are just reciting Liberal talking points tells me just how much of a Liberal you are.

    signature image

    www.miamiproject.miami.edu/

    Buckeye Warrior

  • Buckeye Warrior said...

    I thought i made it pretty clear. Go back and read what you wrote. the fact that you can't see that you are just reciting Liberal talking points tells me just how much of a Liberal you are.

    No, I was talking about the post that I first quoted saying excellent post. I was asking you to come up with factual information to back it up.

    Urban_Meyer